[QUOTE="JoStories, post: 4560853, member: 41189"].....There are some posters here whom I have to work very hard to be kind to despite their continued insulting remarks and so on......
Cogitating and contemplating on your remark I shall ignore such Insulting and uncalled for remarks even if at...
Sorry I edited my previous post while you were busy with your reply.
My further comment thus crossed with your reply.
AS clear as daylight.
But I was only trying to explain what caused me to be snarky at times and from where it originated.
I am at peace with atheists and theists. It is their...
Okay which claims and assertions are you referring to? What Í considered to be a credible resource was not refuted with a credible source.
Take the links to the UCLA which were pooh poohed. If Outhouse is indeed what you say he is why then does he everytime he say "not credible" and I ask...
Yes I know I am at times snarky. It is mainly based on cause and effect on slurs,veiled insults and insults from others.
It is a carry over from the filth, insults and abuse many on the about.com, Atheist Forum were, without provocation, hurling at me.
I then quoted them "do unto others...
We don't need time travel.
We have the akhasic record.; we just need the technology to read it.
It is said that Buddha was only accepted when he read his own karmic record in the akhasic record
Scientists have recently found that crystal etc do in fact store energy patterns of people. (And they...
Would it be wrong to say this is how the Levites are supported by their community. Was it not so that these priests were found eating some of the offerings and sacrifices?
I mean how do we know fact from fiction.
We live in a world of turmoil, doubt and skepticism. All hope we have is to believe that it may be true or that we return as dust to earth or the breath of your God.
It is not blind faith, nay it is hope for a better life and the circumstances we...
Dear me I had already apologized for equating element with component.
It is quite obvious that you have no comprehension of the fact I was using that site to explain that I meant dust to be a component of earth.
Man oh man now it devolves into you using strawman tactics
No bull. Thats nice.
My logic lecturer must have scrambled my mind.
Pseudoscience does not appear to be one of your subjects of understanding. But you sure know how to make veiled insults. To be more specific in what I mean - you ask do I know what specific means, intimating that I am...
I think you may have missed the subsequent conversation that clarifies the position.
Me being argumentative for its own sake I would classify as incorrect. Perhaps you can say this about Outhouse
Please. What have you contributed that is profitable discourse?
Ducking and diving and still bringing nothing to the table is your forte.
Do you think that continually saying it is not academic or not credible are in any way arguments, if so you are sorely mistaken and suffering from true...
Now you attack "Answers in Genesis". I used them for no other purpose but to explain what I meant that Dust is a Component of earth.
Your response is thus meaningless rhetoric.
No your response indicates your ignorance in this regard.
You were speaking in general and the word "stricly" negates your own ad hoc response. i.e you formed, arranged, and/or did it for a particular purpose only.
Of course I knew it would fail because I considered your not so open mind and don't confuse me with the facts attitude.
But one can always hope that you who vaunts the academic would at least be convinced by the finding of academics.
I see you like to skip things and cast red herrings. Have another look what he said using an open mind to the possibilities he speaks of.
It was an attempted explanation, for your enlightenment, of what I considered dust to be ! - viz a component of earth.