Get off your high-horse as a lecturer shouting at his class.
Yeah man I merely mentioned them. From your education you should have read about them. Darn I forget people are normally interested in their narrow fields of expertise and we nowadays find very few eclectics.
QUITE NASTY ARE YOU...
He is quite correct that you are breaching internet etiquette and that by using the large emphasized font you appear to be shouting/yelling.
You should know better and not insult people with remarks such as the foregoing.
Do you have true understanding of human nature?
Tell me did you read with comprehension what I said. I merely informed him of not making any claims and at the same time informed him of part of my education. Your spiel on this does not speak well for one of your education.
Since I embrace the universe and as all realities are my reality I...
Does this give him license to deliberate twist your words or use strawman tactics? Is he with some of his remarks not asking for it?
Go back to the drawing board, count and see how many snide remarks, innuendos, direct insults and fallacious assumptions he throws about.
But so what I...
Using capital emphasized letters is bad internet etiquette as it donates shouting at others.
He surely gives the impression that every time a newbie to this forum gives him the right to regard them as a new chew toy.
He also uses the words "unsubstantiated and fallacies" ad nauseam but so far...
Sure mister know it all. You are exhibiting all the characteristics you accuse me of. Is this not merely you projecting what you are on to me? So when the truth comes along you suddenly suffer from blindness and then try the "majority" argument. The majority once believed the earth was flat...
Your own rhetoric says that you cherry pick because I keep saying one must study all things which negates what you say.
How about updating your knowledge concerning the so-called pseudoscience of present day DNA splicing.
Pray tell me how, when a where does your "god" named academia reject my...
Your opinion of post hoc rationalization, in my opinion holds no water. It merely amounts to a plain rejection of something that does not conform to your opinion.
I have always considered this reference to "the dust of the earth" to be an element of earth. As such it has no relevance to the...
Now, now; New to a forum does not mean we are new to life and religious thoughts. This is an assumption on your part if you think and say so.
>>"Why would you attack knowledge<<" -Because your knowledge may be outdated
The Living Bible says his wife.
I have no more to say on the matter except to ask you, now that your internet etiquette has improved -
1. Does this event from the distant past in the history of the Jews in any way whatsoever have relevance, profit or provide enrichment of our present day...
Bah--So jolly old Isaiah approached the prophetess of god, made her preggie and he was told by God to give him a name other than Immanuel and you wish to palm this off as fulfulling the prophesy regarding Immanuel. The god given sign was to the King not to Isaiah ! and quite obvious by the...
Now that is a new one - referring someone to something you say did not exist!
Look who is talking ! Has someone again cornered you and now your own malarky, synicism and skepticism must hold sway ?
One must investigate all things and not only those that please him.
Delusions are found as a psychosis in people in all walks of life. It is like a sickness; it does not ask who or what you are; irrespective of the person it just invades your mind or body!
I think that you do not wish to grasp the fact that there are many thoughts and sayings in the bible that are still applicable in our times and they, because of this, have stood the test of time.
Your opponent in the matter also appears to be on a path of non-understanding for his reply is...