Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
And "Jesus never existed" isn't an extraordinary claim, nooooooo.......
No, not at all. It is quite common for figures written about to not exist in actuality.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And "Jesus never existed" isn't an extraordinary claim, nooooooo.......
That is the stupidest thing you have ever said logician. Go back in time and prove to me he didn't exist.
I'm gonna go with Michael Tucker.If you ever wondered, this is what Jesus probably looked like:
We don't need time travel.Until you can time travel to prove he did exist, I will assume not.
We don't need time travel.
We have the akhasic record.; we just need the technology to read it.
It is said that Buddha was only accepted when he read his own karmic record in the akhasic record
Scientists have recently found that crystal etc do in fact store energy patterns of people. (And they were not researching psychometry )
This is quite an interesting read
http://meanings.crystalsandjewelry.com/how-to-program-crystals/
Perhaps Edgar Cayce dould do this, but I am not putting my head on block in this regard
http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/edgarcayce.aspx
Don't see any peer reviewed papers from scientists in the links you provided. Define "energy patterns" and provide evidence of their existence.
He follows pseudoscience and thinks answersingenesis is credible.
Don't see any peer reviewed papers from scientists in the links you provided. Define "energy patterns" and provide evidence of their existence.
Sure "could also be" denotes an uncertainty so why try to quote it as factual ?
Bah--So jolly old Isaiah approached the prophetess of god, made her preggie and he was told by God to give him a name other than Immanuel and you wish to palm this off as fulfulling the prophesy regarding Immanuel. The god given sign was to the King not to Isaiah ! and quite obvious by the sons name not relevant to your assumption.
Try straightening out your timeline. It says this child will eat curds and honey. This is a sure indication of there will only be a remnant remaining of that nation after it had been pillaged. They will only have one cow and two sheep and all they will have to eat is curds and wild honey. Yes try to fathom this and adjust your timeline accordingly !
The Living Bible says his wife.
I have no more to say on the matter except to ask you, now that your internet etiquette has improved -
1. Does this event from the distant past in the history of the Jews in any way whatsoever have relevance, profit or provide enrichment of our present day lives?
To you my child it appears to only have egoist value in that you and your source is correct and that all others are not.
2. Have you identified the device I gave you a clue to; A further clue - the one that shocks you to death if you touch it.
3. Have you since updated your timeline?
We have the akhasic record
and ancient aliens became credible when?
Don't see any peer reviewed papers from scientists in the links you provided. Define "energy patterns" and provide evidence of their existence.
Edit: you specifically stated scientists showed that crystals could store the energy patterns of people. Please definethe phrase "energy patterns"and provide a link to the scientific paper which supports your assertion.
What "we" is he talking about? That's total woo. Records that can't be produced are of no value.
Holographic data storageSecond Edit: Still waiting for the link to the scientific study showing how "energy patterns" can be "stored" in crystals. You said there was such a study done....where is it? At least name the scientists so others can verify. If you cannot, then at least admit it does not actually exist and you made it up.
You apparently have no understand of the ahkasic record. It has absolutely nothing to do with ancient aliens. Try reading the Mahabarata, Vedas and old Sanskrit writings.and ancient aliens became credible when?
And you need to get your time lines straight. Immanuel as the son of Isaiah remains a mystery.BALONEY! You need to go back up and read the info. In fact you need to read Isaiah from verse ONE.
BEFORE - he shall LEARN GOOD FROM BAD - the two kings mentioned - will be destroyed.
Obviously not some future Jesus.
Obviously I'm not trying to "palm this off," as I provided the verses showing the Isaiah verses take place at ONE time, during a war which Isaiah is in.
Also - obviously - earlier theologians also realized this - or Immanuel would not be listed as Isaiah's son in Strong's, etc.
*
And you need to get your time lines straight. Immanuel as the son of Isaiah remains a mystery.
God obviously said to the King then he would give a sign, a child will be born to a virgin and he will eat curds and honey. Where did he say a child will be born to a virgin and that it will be Isaiah's son?
It is then explained when this will be viz when there is only a remnant left of that nation and after it has been stripped to such an extent that the "remnant" will be so poor that the will only have one cow and two sheep and that they will then eat curds and honey.
From the given time line It is quite obvious it has nothing to do with Jesus for he was ever named Immanuel
You apparently have no understand of the ahkasic record. It has absolutely nothing to do with ancient aliens. Try reading the Mahabarata, Vedas and old Sanskrit writings.