I believe that Evil is a negative entity. Not an entity at all, in fact. I see it as the absence or privation of good. Evil has no substance; unlike good, it is insubstantial
The Problem of Evil
A perfectly powerful being can prevent any evil.
A perfectly good being will prevent evil as far as he can.
God is perfectly powerful and good.
So, if a perfectly powerful and good God exists, there will be no evil.
There is evil.
Therefore, God doesn’t exist.
Ah! In that case, I'm sorry. Can you understand that it 'sounded' like a claim (Jesus is NOT God), especially with the capitalization?
No, the answer is that you, not Wildswanderer, see yourself as the paragon of rationality in this forum. Maybe it'd time for you to ask yourself if your...
Not again, Tb! I have tried to help you with this irrational thinking process of yours in the past. Let's try again. You have just made a claim ("Jesus is NOT God").
May we see the evidence on which you base this claim of yours?
Lovely example of ......
...........which logically fallacy? ;)
I was responding to your:
"Also, most believers are not willing to bend and try to see the atheist side of things."
The object of that sentence is 'most believers', not 'atheists'. Maybe read more carefully?
And my response was:
"Why not just do what you said you wanted to do and burn their...
I did not say you did. I was responding to this:
"The reason that we see religionists complaining about their beliefs being criticized is because they are the ones being criticized by atheists. If believers criticized atheists the way atheists criticized believers then atheists would be...
Has it ever crossed your mind, joelr, even for a second or two, that what A. considers to be reasonable evidence to warrant belief may be different from what B.considers to be reasonable evidence to warrant belief?
Thank you. I thought not.
The words in bold are an assumption. You are assuming that your belief that MrB was the Representative of God among men is justified true belief.
It's really not, is it? ;) And so your conclusion ("that means He had the authority to interpret those records") is...
But some of your beliefs (eg that God exists) you say that you know. How do you decide what you can say with certainty that you 'know', in contrast with what you believe?
No problem here, Tb.
You said that only MrB had authority to interpret those records.
Then you said that MrB said that He had the authority to interpret those records.
Is it "You said" or "MrB. said"?
An opinion is not necessarily based upon fact or knowledge.
It is my opinion that there is a teapot orbiting the moon.
A belief can be based on facts.
I believe that the earth is an ellipsoid.