I'd have to know what you mean by God to even attempt to figure out if that exists.
In defining God I usually come across all powerful, omniscient, benevolent, just, and that God has power and authority over life on earth. I can safely rule all that out.
Does any other atheist out there positively assert that God(s) do not exist? I do. One of the reasons is that nature is brutal, and indifferent to life and morals. My positive conviction says absolutely nothing about me being arrogant, immoral, or angry. It's simply very convincing that gods...
Lying can be an honest necessity for the protection of innocent life, and for other honest reasons. I don't define honesty as telling the whole truth no matter what. Honesty in my definition is as much concealing matters, as well as telling someone what they deserve to hear from you. Honesty is...
When he had that type of innocence and was unthreatening it would be morally wrong to end his life. It's when they have the means to gain power and full commitment to exterminate that the action of killing becomes necessary and right to do. It has to be evident. Prevention first until it becomes...
Kindness vs. cruelty
Love vs. hatred
Honesty vs. Lies
Charity vs. genocide
Humility vs. Arrogance
Dignity vs. abasement
Destruction vs. civilization
Honor vs. shame
Treating others as well as you desire to be treated. Vs. treating others worse than you desire for yourself.
Trustworthy vs...
I find this assessment and definition to be senseless and missing the point. It sounds like you are saying that the military would be in the murder business, and all matters of ending life are murder. There's nothing obscure about murder vs. killing. You are muddying the waters by saying...
It would not be murder to kill Hitler. Murder and killing are vastly different. Killing is in defense of innocence. Murder is only to end innocent life. People are not careful in defining this major distinction. No wonder there's so much moral confusion out there.
Innocence has no malicious...
You are setting humans as the standard for morality instead of the causes and effects of what a given morality does for the well being, good will, trustworthiness, peace and quality of life for all life on earth. There are inherently good and bad things in life despite the lack of agency, and...
I don't see how a moral agent is required for objective moral truth. The fact that we can talk about moral justice, and determine all the best values, and virtues to live by and then create effective laws against vices, and crimes suggests that a moral truth exists. The fact that there are...
Why would this all matter if in fact morality is objective? Subjective opinions on morality can be very much in error. Nothing has to be guided by objective moral truth for there to actually be objective moral truth. Objective moral truth would be true regardless of how anyone feels...
Evil ranges from commiting severe violations against other people for advantage, power, and/or pleasure to commiting atrocity against others to destroy others, for advantage, power, and/or pleasure. Genetics, and environment have nothing to do with it. Where people fall on the spectrum of good...
People do things for mutual advantage by nature. Why command reciprocity?
Giving back to society is what the tax system is supposed to do. Love is free and freely given.
I am atheist and have my own belief system. In my religion I consider that there are ways of knowing the moral, and the spiritual through inner experience, outward expression, imagination, relationship and meditation. I do not find God to be a useful concept.
Being secular to me is about...
I keep wanting to know more about other religions but the Abrahamic religions keep coming up, and they have unwanted influence in the world.
Brahman interests me. Any religion that questions itself, and involves free thought, and doesn't harm people is worthy of investigation. The force in...