Okay then, first of all if I did not address some of your points you are being hypocritical as you just addressed none of mine.
Second of all show me what points I did not address.
Sorry that I am not so naive as to take your assertions as fact without a good argument.
I have been part of...
I guessed that opposing thoughts to what the video is trying to generate is what you meant but contrary thinking literally would mean "The opposite of using one's mind to consider or reason about something."
This is obviously relevant to your post. Please don't tell me you are a troll.
In case you don't understand basic logic, the default position to a claim is to not believe it and that is what a skeptic does. Therefore a skeptical theist could only exist if there where solid proof of their deity...
Don't try that bull**** with me.
Here have it right now.
Now address the rest of the post and don't instead try to divert to something else like I suspect you want to.
Holding skepticism to a negative position is redundant.
By that same logic you should be skeptical about lacking a belief in bigfoot or lacking a belief that the government is ran by mole people.
Unless they have some sort of evidence that the rest of the world is nor privy to then they...
Sorry missed that message.
You rejected any form of rational evidence that I or the video tried to use despite using rational rather than empirical arguments.
How about you tell me what I need to provide instead of moving the goal posts?
People attribute alchemy to Egpyt but I have seen no evidence of that. Mind showing some proof?
Actually archaeology seems to suggest that the Jews where never slaves to the Egyptians.