Here is the thing.
It is true that they are not based on certainty. But none of your assertions are either. Every observation of reality has a differing degree of certainty. And the certainty of stastics is much more sound than all of your unbacked claims.
So since you said you needed a spirit to guide you, that your morals come from your soul, and that people have souls, does that not mean that your own soul can guide your morality?
I would say no the only things they have in common are what they have to have by definition, faith and the supernatural.
Islam is very different from Wicca for example.
So basically your saying he creates people with certian traits full well knowing that those traits would make them reject the Bible and then tortures people for rejecting the Bible?
That sounds like a ****ing psychopath.
No I think like a philosophy major.
1st of all, if a god made all of us he would know we have different ideas of common sense so he would have known that ambiguous instructions would not be useful.
2nd of all, your saying that Catholics cannot tell the difference between the Pope a priest and...
Yeah and your grammar is not very good.
I think your trying to say that humans using the discoveries of science debases the science which would not make any sense.
Science is a method not a collection of ideas.
Thank you for demonstrating that you have confirmation bias.
I am saying that facts are near- certian observations of truth that are subject to change. The truth however is unchanging.
For example, it was a fact that the atom could not be split but it was not the truth.