1) You can't prove that the soul is immortal.
2) I don't care if it is, it is still ending someones memories and forcing your will onto their life.
3) If your deities best solution is just to murder everyone but a few people when he doesn't like what going on then he's either not...
YOU made the claim and therefore you have the burden of proof.
Scientifically disproven, there is a generic link to personality traits and most develop from how you are raised.
That is not why it is immoral. By your new logic it is okay as long as you don't need them. And since your deity...
It could also be true that they did not exist because Lord Helix thought they where tasty. It has just as much evidence as what you are proposing
Or we can go with what was discovered through the scientific process, which by the way is why you have the technology you are reading this with, and...
This assertion is not logical.
And the Ring-Wraiths did not kill Frodo.
Let me give you a basic logic tip.
To even begin making a case for a claim. You need a claim and something to back it up.
Citation please.
If we don't retain memory, personality, or upbringing then how are we the same person?
By that logic you should go out and kill all of the innocent people you can.
That's not what the Abrahamic god did though.
Well the Abrahamic deity killed all of the humans but a few in a flood according to most Abrahamic religions. Are you saying that there were no children, toddlers, babies, or pregnant women?
Also what the **** is this supposed to be?
This does not even cite sources from what I can see, and if it does somewhere it **** sure did not cite them properly.
Repeatable experiments?
So let me ask you, which experiments do you remove from your meta-analysis?
Lets say I had 100 experiments of a 100 different people guessing a coin toss 5 times.
Well chances are that many of them will guess above the average and many will guess below the average. So...
So your evidence that it is not fantasy or wishful thinking is asserting that it is not fantasy or wishful thinking?
I'm sure you know that is circular reasoning Pope.