• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Public School Bible Class: Imagine Adam Crawling up the Back of a Dinosaur

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
You probably wouldn't see humans and apes anywhere near the dinosaurs, Must have got caught in different mud slides.
That's just it. They don't exist in the same strata. We've never found primate fossils anywhere near the strata we find dinosaurs. And we've never found dinosaurs above the K-T Boundary, which is a layer of rock found literally everywhere on the planet in the same relative place. It is a literal "band" of distinct rock. It sticks out like a sore thumb. Beyond that point, we don't see very many big animals until much later.

And as the Story goes, People didn't die originally. Adam and Eve could have been around forever if they had not eaten the forbidden fruit. So you wouldn't find fossilized humans. Who can say how long they lived since their timers didn't start until they ate the forbidden fruit and sin entered the world. At that point their days were number to 1,000 years which is equal to 1 day in God time. As he said, " In the day that you eat of it you will surely die."
One thousand years is not remotely long enough. Multiply that number a few hundred-thousand or so times and get back to me.
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
That's just it. They don't exist in the same strata. We've never found primate fossils anywhere near the strata we find dinosaurs. And we've never found dinosaurs above the K-T Boundary, which is a layer of rock found literally everywhere on the planet in the same relative place. It is a literal "band" of distinct rock. It sticks out like a sore thumb. Beyond that point, we don't see very many big animals until much later.


One thousand years is not remotely long enough. Multiply that number a few hundred-thousand or so times and get back to me.

You didn't get what I was saying. They could have lived indefinitely before they sinned, and could have been a few hundred thousand years old. But when they sinned, death entered the world, they became mortal, at that point their days were numbered to 1,000 years.
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
You didn't get what I was saying. They could have lived indefinitely before they sinned, and could have been a few hundred thousand years old. But when they sinned, death entered the world, they became mortal, at that point their days were numbered to 1,000 years.
No, no no. I said multiply that 1000 by a few hundreds of thousands. You need 65 million years just to see the ***-end of the Cretaceous Period.
 

CogentPhilosopher

Philosophy Student
You didn't get what I was saying. They could have lived indefinitely before they sinned, and could have been a few hundred thousand years old. But when they sinned, death entered the world, they became mortal, at that point their days were numbered to 1,000 years.

Then why are there transitionary fossils?
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
No, no no. I said multiply that 1000 by a few hundreds of thousands. You need 65 million years just to see the ***-end of the Cretaceous Period.

I said indefinitely. At 365,000 years our time Adam and Eve were 1 year old God time. Adam was alone for a long time so Eve had not even been created until Adam was millions our time.
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
I said indefinitely. At 365,000 years our time Adam and Eve were 1 year old God time. Adam was alone for a long time so Eve had not even been created until Adam was millions our time.
I'm not sure it's fruitful to keep going on if you're going to keep arbitrarily increasing their life-span without giving me one reason to think that is more likely than the explanation of "there just weren't humans around when there were dinosaurs".

Occam's Razor says that the over-whelming majority of the time, the answer with the smallest number of conditions required to be correct, is the right one. And right now that's quite clearly "there are no human fossils from dinosaur-times because there simply were no people then".
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I'm not sure it's fruitful to keep going on if you're going to keep arbitrarily increasing their life-span without giving me one reason to think that is more likely than the explanation of "there just weren't humans around when there were dinosaurs".

Occam's Razor says that the over-whelming majority of the time, the answer with the smallest number of conditions required to be correct, is the right one. And right now that's quite clearly "there are no human fossils from dinosaur-times because there simply were no people then".

It could also be true, there were no human fossils because humans did not die. Just like the Bible says.
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
It could also be true, there were no human fossils because humans did not die. Just like the Bible says.
Right. Forgive me, but I have no reason to assume we magically just started dying. It's much more likely we simply did not come into the picture far, far, far later.
 

CogentPhilosopher

Philosophy Student
It could also be true, there were no human fossils because humans did not die. Just like the Bible says.

It could also be true that they did not exist because Lord Helix thought they where tasty. It has just as much evidence as what you are proposing

Or we can go with what was discovered through the scientific process, which by the way is why you have the technology you are reading this with, and has actually been able to predict genetic findings and fossil locations.
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Right. Forgive me, but I have no reason to assume we magically just started dying. It's much more likely we simply did not come into the picture far, far, far later.

There we have a difference of opinion. Especially since that good old bible is holding up so well in it's account of such difficult things.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
All I have to say is.....
giphy.gif
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Why, what's wrong with it?
Well, for starters, it says birds were created before land animals, which is demonstrably wrong. Next, it says humans were created in a similar time-frame to other, contemporary animals, which is demonstrably wrong. And it says that the sun, moon and stars formed after plants and oceans, which is demonstrably wrong.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
It's interesting that in a free country where people pay for their own clubs, there are some people who don't want them to be free.
 
Top