• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Gjallarhorn

    Is it natural to want to kill somebody out of jealousy, according to our modern scientific paradigm?

    Sure, as long as that action isn't dooming your ability to breed and survive. Mutually assured destruction is antithetical to evolution (before having children, of course).
  2. Gjallarhorn

    How One Unvaccinated Child Caused a Measles Outbreak

    Non-sequitur much?
  3. Gjallarhorn

    if i masturbate will i go to hell?

    The reason it is embarrassing is because people have been raised to believe it is embarrassing, and sometimes even sinful.
  4. Gjallarhorn

    Curing phedophiles and Pandora's box.

    Fair point as well. Let's forget science. Let's just yell bigoted statements at each other and call it a day.
  5. Gjallarhorn

    Curing phedophiles and Pandora's box.

    Uh-huh. That's obviously not biased at all. :rolleyes:
  6. Gjallarhorn

    Curing phedophiles and Pandora's box.

    Is it wise to use papers from the 19th century to judge sexual desire? I would love to know what the paper says about homosexuality.
  7. Gjallarhorn

    Satanic/LHP poetry & writings thread

    Satan's neat, Let's eat.
  8. Gjallarhorn

    A Symbol for Sciences

  9. Gjallarhorn

    morals of an non believer ...

    No Time For Crime: Study Finds More Religious Communities Have Lower Rates Of Black, White and Latino Violence | David Briggs But then you consider... Global Peace Index Shows Least Religious Countries Among Most Peaceful, Highly Religious Countries Among The Least Peaceful
  10. Gjallarhorn

    Ask someone from another world

    Do they have cookies where you're from?
  11. Gjallarhorn

    God's Will as the Sum of Total Parts?

    Heat death is the ultimate end of the universe. All energy is moving from a state of high to low. It's not isolated; it's everywhere. That would mean God, or at least a pantheistic god, wants us collectively dead.
  12. Gjallarhorn

    Is it natural to want to kill somebody out of jealousy, according to our modern scientific paradigm?

    You ask about evolution and then throw Cain and Abel and some loopy ideas about Messianic moral high ground into it and you expect a coherent answer? Just because they should go hand in hand doesn't mean they do.
  13. Gjallarhorn

    God's Will as the Sum of Total Parts?

    The will of God is therefore heat death. "You have to consider the possibility that God does not like you, never wanted you, in all probability he hates you. It's not the worst thing that could happen."
  14. Gjallarhorn

    Is it natural to want to kill somebody out of jealousy, according to our modern scientific paradigm?

    ...does this really have anything to do with science? Or are you just looking for a religious debate better suited for a DIR?
  15. Gjallarhorn

    Give me a book referral about your religion

    Star Wars - Traitor
  16. Gjallarhorn

    The Force as Existentialism/Absurdism (Jedi Realism)

    Uh, okay... Nowhere in my post did I reference another "past looking religion" so...thanks for the input?
  17. Gjallarhorn

    Incest

    Wow. This is practically the worst argument for anything I've ever seen. Nature isn't against anything and everything is selfish.
  18. Gjallarhorn

    The Force as Existentialism/Absurdism (Jedi Realism)

    ...so?
  19. Gjallarhorn

    Is it natural to want to kill somebody out of jealousy, according to our modern scientific paradigm?

    Everything is natural and, as I have explained to you before, envy makes perfect sense within natural selection.
  20. Gjallarhorn

    Existential Truths

    I take issue with the statement that "Conscious beings are the transcendence of their own facticity, ergo necessarily free and responsible for every action chosen throughout life." Seems without evidence and without actual substance (both literally and figuratively)
Top