What part of he had no evidence and to back his claim and he ended up taking his claim back are not understanding???? Besides that. You acknowledge he has no evidence to back up his claim but yet you still believe him. What’s that’s saying?
"Absence of evidence is evidence of absence"
I mean it’s not really gonna matter because your going to deny it anyway, but what the hell
House Republicans Complain About Rules They Approved In 2015 - The National Memo
False. He had no evidence whatsoever of Marie yovonavich giving him a verbal do not prosecute List.
Ukraine Prosecutor General Lutsenko admits U.S. ambassador didn't give him a do not prosecute list
it’s seems you only want to focus on the false accusation and not how he admitting himself that...
first you said aid was withheld due to corruption and anti corruption and that was proven false. Now you say the POTUS determines US foreign policy not the pentagon. All I see is you playing trivial games instead of addressing the issues.
Sigh. The Pentagon certified Ukraine met anti-corruption benchmarks to justify aid disbursal in May.
It’s like you forgot George Kent testified to that already.
FYI it’s not "Adam Shiff Rules” Republican were the ones that created the rules and Republicans on the committee intentionally broke rules to pretend Adam Schiff was mistreating them.
he took his statement back because it was proving to be false. Perhaps you can’t fathom someone taken they’re false statements back because you make false statements all the time and never take them back even when they are proven to be false.
as I told u before, being prepped to about stuff you have know knowledge own is not the same as being concerned. They just told her if the question comes up, direct it to the proper channels. The only concern the Obama administration had was the republicans turning her hearing into a farce...
You see what your doing is called logic chopping, which is focusing on trivial details instead of directly addressing the main issue in dispute which is Marie Yovanovitch being Prepped to say "Ask the Bidens" about the Bidens clearly a massive conspiracy there.
didn’t you say the Obama...
what part of she didn’t have any knowledge on hunter Biden and Bursima and being prepped on it before her senate confrimation hearings are u not understanding? Also it was brought up as a topic for a practice Q&A before she was to be questioned by Senate before being confirmed for her job. That...
constantly repeating false claims is straight outta the denialist handbook. I also noticed how he ain’t got nothing to say about that debunked "do not prosecute list" conspiracy theory.
What?
By prepped they mean told her to direct questions about a person and a company she knew nothing about back to those who do have knowledge.
Sounds truly nefarious.
And if it was a problem that it is now, why didn't any Republicans raise the issue during her confirmation hearings?
also...
no this is what she said.
I have never met Hunter Biden, nor have I had any direct or indirect conversations with him. And although I have met former Vice President Biden several times over the course of our many years in government service, neither he nor the previous Administration ever...
apparently you don’t have a problem with the republicans trying to brake the rules so they can put on a farce, but you do have a problem with the democrats trying to remind the republicans of the rules. What was that about this not being about the left or the right to validate that ones...
Context matters. She made of aware of it because she didn’t know about it perviously. I mean she said it herself in the video I gave u. Her first statement was apart of her opening testimony where she talked about her many yrs of government service and although she have met former Vice President...
She was made aware of it to prepare her for her senate confrimation hearings. Meaning she didn’t know anything about prior. You just can’t help being a liar and dishonest. And as usual your sources are predominantly form right wing media. In this case it’s townhall. Which is a hotbed for right...
No it didn’t. You just copied and pasted some right wing nonsense. Which I find odd. Because you allegedly watched the whole 7hours of her testimony and yet came to the conclusion that she lied based on two statements that were taken outta context but right wing media.
In any case here’s a clip...
Exactly. All he did was copy and paste some BS from some right wing blog. I don’t understand how someone says they watched 7hrs of testimony and say she lied by using to statements that don’t coincide with eachother. One statement was apart of her opening testimony and the other was an answer to...