You're overthinking, and not in the clever way.
No one has to take responsibility for the error. The only thing people have to take responsibility for is the correction of the error, and really it could be anyone. We have a legal and criminal system whose functions are to diagnose and correct...
A correction but a more effective one. Punishment assumes the person has acted solely of their own volition and therefore punishment will (somehow) deter further crime, despite actual data gathered about recidivism.
Rehabilitation assumes people are the product of circumstances and must be...
And I wouldn't feel the need to mask my action in something more noble than anger.
The term is obsolete unless you feel uneasy about acting out of anger.
Perhaps "excuse" was the wrong word. Lack of free will doesn't make murder irrelevant. Legal systems can continue to function (without double-think) if shifted to a rehabilitation system rather than a retributive system.
Jesus got angry and acted out of anger. Dressing it up in special terminology doesn't change this fact.
If someone insults my family and I punch them in the face, I am not being "righteously indignant". I am being an ***. Call it what you will but acting out of anger is not "righteous".
Your false equivocation of free will and random action is noted.
The beginning was random. There is no free will.
"Either our wills are determined by prior causes and we are not responsible for them, or they are the product of chance and we are not responsible for them. If a man's choice to...
I'm gonna stop you here because frankly, you started rambling.
Of course a corpse is less complex. So is a broken computer. Computers are naturally complex, just like humans. The only difference is we built computers, so we can analyze it. The human mind and nervous system is the product...