• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Sir Doom

    American Athiests now have their own TV-Channel

    If its funny, I'm sure I'll see lots of it on Youtube.
  2. Sir Doom

    science vs religion - what does it take?

    As if that's all I said. Concede sarcastically or sincerely, makes no difference to me. If you want to prove it otherwise then make an argument. Until you do, I'll assume you can't.
  3. Sir Doom

    science vs religion - what does it take?

    No, you are being a hypocrite. I'm pointing that out. You are wrong and you should agree with me because I'm right. Its the same. The difference you see is nothing but confirmation bias. You believing what you read because it says 'science' on the cover is the same as a Christian believing what...
  4. Sir Doom

    science vs religion - what does it take?

    First, you do need faith to believe something like that. Its not like you can measure. I'd be willing to bet you couldn't even rattle off how it is scientists determine how far the sun is from us without hitting Google. Nor is it important that you should. You should recognize the parallel...
  5. Sir Doom

    science vs religion - what does it take?

    Disproving science would take a complete unraveling of all known physical properties of anything at all. The complete obliteration of reality. That's the only thing. Even if something like that happened, that wouldn't indicate that God was in charge. Science is an extension of typical human...
  6. Sir Doom

    Lets say AI is possible in the future.

    Yeah, I was actually just remembering that they do this sometimes, but its always at the expense of something. Like the people are just empty shells with no ambition or drive since every need is provided.
  7. Sir Doom

    Lets say AI is possible in the future.

    I was just thinking, its interesting you almost never hear about the super-mega-ultra AI that doesn't enslave humanity and cares about human rights and just does a damn fine job of making life better for us. I guess that would be a boring movie...
  8. Sir Doom

    Lets say AI is possible in the future.

    Aren't you supposed to ask it to solve logical paradoxes so it self-destructs?
  9. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    Couldn't help yourself, huh?
  10. Sir Doom

    Lets say AI is possible in the future.

    I don't think AI like that is realistic given our current computer technology. If we ever start engineering actual biological life, however... then maybe we'll have something we wish we never made. Still pretty slim that we'd make that mistake, though. Time travel to the past is something else...
  11. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    Hey, I resemble that remark!
  12. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    You evidence your claim by appealing to an authority that neither of us respects, and both of us think is wrong. I'm representing what you've said to me. Not sure what else you think I can do. Why are you hanging on to this so tightly? In what WEIRD *** UNIVERSE do you consider someone who...
  13. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    You don't seem to realize that I told you what to do and then you did it. I knew what to say to make that happen. That's power whether you like it or not. Spare me. I was interested in continuing the conversation we were having. You didn't seem to be. Instead you wanted to start a new...
  14. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    I am not upset about it at all. I think he should be allowed to wear his colander because it doesn't prevent the ID from working. Freedom of speech covers that just fine. The fact that there ARE religious exceptions and that he used that rule as a loophole to brook no argument from the ID folks...
  15. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    See above. Foot... you shot it. You take a religious exception as a religion. That validates the exception. You've validated it with your participation. If you demanded the exception without the religion totally different story. Now you are against the exception. Should be all of ours. Free...
  16. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    It is, and thanks. You aren't entering in. You were already here. You ignored my response to you and responded to someone else response. Why would I let that happen? I know that. And I'll respond if I wish, or not. Harmony! What did you think was happening? Quite aware of my options, thanks. As...
  17. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    Granted, but he also has taken part already. I'm not going encourage him to ignore that. There is stuff on the table he hasn't addressed. He can address it, or we have nothing to talk about. I'm quite satisfied with your answer to the post he just responded to, considering you are elaborating on...
  18. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    Luis, respond to the post I directed at you. 9-10ths is more than capable of holding his end of the conversation without you. PS: You don't have the first clue what my expectations are. I'll respond to this, since I mentioned you: A fine political goal. Not a religious goal at all. Do you...
  19. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    My apologies, I expected that you were unable to differentiate between religion and a political group based on the way you asked it. Silly me. A religion is a philosophy based on metaphysical ideals. But not literally... How'd they manage that? Like, did they actually expect that FSM boiled for...
  20. Sir Doom

    Colander Hats on IDs: Legitimate Religious Statement or Atheists Acting Childish?

    That's right. And I don't. A political group concerns itself with the alteration of public policy towards its agenda. A religious group may or may not do the same. See? Easy. 'Took it seriously' in what way? So, despite the fact that you can't seem to recall what it is that they were taking...
Top