The latter. Definitely not the former.
Any Church will die out when it loses meaning for everyone. But the easily-adaptable, evolving religion will not.
Never mind the fact that social justice started in Catholicism and SHOULD be a priority of all Catholics! This is pure lunacy. I love the Catholic Church, I realy do, but they really have their heads where the sun don't shine sometimes.
LEL
For the record, though, I agree. It's not wide enough in scope and it keeps saying I should be a Jain.
I disagree with most of Jainism. I believe in God, for crying out loud! How am I a Jain?
i m a cirhstin lEL but im wundering teh same thign XDDDDDDDDD
ppl want 2 be muslums bcus they haet america and all budists are hipsters
of course jewss are bank guyz and sttufffffff ;)
but onlyy cHristians are kewl
I thought he was merely a fundamentalist, but wow. That's a really serious claim. I wonder if he can prove it by showing us the "good fruits" of his prophethood, but I'll end it right here because that's not what this thread is about.
This also basically means that we can't argue with him...
If your holy book contains the dictated words of God and it uses a human language, then your God has a human language, so He is human in some aspects.
No?
So, in these two paragraphs, you're making an incorrect historical claim (coupled with, perhaps, an insinuation that Islam is Satanic) AND a claim to prophecy? Dude, I know this is ad hominem, but you're not helping your case at all.
A pretty fair comparison, actually! :D
They weren't the brightest bunch, those guys (with a few exceptions, like Thomas in the Gospel of John). It's like a professor teaching a remedial elementary school class at times. The situations range from light-heartedly funny to fairly sad.