That's not an example you have ever shown any of us.
You have wallowed not stop in pseudoscience and mythology proselytizing a faith you seem to know little about and ANY academic level.
You need to actually understand the material you debate.
You mean the book that plagiarized Canaanite mythology and combined two gods into one, before another culture decided to plagiarize Judaism and redefine the god concept completely ???
No the god concept you have faith in we actually have...
YOU mean the book I found so much value in that I went to multiple universities to study its details????????
While you remain in a position that no credible school follows or promotes.
You mean you adore to pervert history and geology and paleontology. DO YOU know we require honesty here???????????
You have fought tooth and nail against their credible findings, trying to promote your factual pseudoscience.
The age of the earth is considered fact, and it must bother you...
Simple Definition of rhetorical
: of, relating to, or concerned with the art of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people
of a question : asked in order to make a statement rather than to get an answer
This might help you :rolleyes:
Non sequitur
Its not about knowing, they fight these things or ignore them because its your only option since none of your history carries any credibility to the point you have a complete consensus that rejects your mythology and labels it pseudohistory.
We don't care what you have faith in...
Well it is painfully obvious you don't understand.
Who is stating besides You or other apologist the universe started from nothing.
Our knowledge stops at the singularity which was something.
But this is an imaginative question.
All the books written by ancient men do not describe intelligent design, they describe creation in detail. Details that have no credibility what so ever and not a speck of historicity.
So why ever think this has a chance of being real when its known as...
Something NOT natural.
We can go out in nature and find many things not natural that were actually designed. We can even find where monkeys throw rocks at trees leaving a semi intelligent trail of evidence.
But we cannot find anything that substantiates a single one of the thousands of...
NO Sarcasm needed. Here is the low down, that is not down low.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics_and_the_Book_of_Mormon
There is generally no direct support amongst mainstream historians and archaeologists for the historicity of the Book of Mormon.
This means your book has no support...
And what we do actually know with certainty is that those who study history can describe it with credibility in many places.
The religious often ONLY see mythology and NOTHING more.
No god has ever given anything to anyone. We know ancient people who did not know anything about anything made mythology for many gods and said they did things.
Not one thing in the world has EVER been substantiated to any deity EVER
We are talking about people here who rely on nothing more then imagination.
Anyone with little education and no knowledge on any given topic can imagine away any interpretation no matter how factually false it is, no matter how much reason was thrown out the window.
In the future I believe...
Non sequitur.
Some religions promote different dogma, and some of that dogma is primitive IMHO. And islam is not the only guilty party.
We were talking about levels of religious devotion in context. People so devoted they would murder to protect their own faith.
Your factually in error.
It is only us who have evidence ONLY man wrote the text.
It is YOU who has no evidence at all. Your god does not even exist scientifically because there is nothing to observe, NO EVIDENCE.
Then it is upon you to prove your statements are in fact historical.
Please provide credible sources or even wiki that states your position is historical.
We don't need to play word games, and we do require honesty here. YOU know you cannot provide any credible source to substantiate any of...