If you're so good in reading my mind then tell me which portion I did not understand?
Sorry but wikipedia is not authoritative source, beside that it is known to contain misinformation and subjective content especially in politically motivated areas.
Getting a PDF copy seems difficult to find but if you find it somewhere search for code 302:
Sexual deviation is categorized as sociopathic personality disturbance:
What is SOCIOPATHIC PERSONALITY DISTURBANCE? (Psychology Dictionary)
The only reason it was removed is because of gay activists...
No not that, you said homosexuality is not diagnosis of mental disorder because it was "learned" it is not,
can you please enlighten me how it was learned? according to which psychiatric research was that learned?
The truth you speak of is actually called "proof", but we are not talking about proofs here, rather about methods to come to objective truth.
If you reread my post you'll see that objective truth is either known or unknown, not being able to present proof doesn't make unknown objective truth...
Can science prove there are no other realities?
If by reality you mean "observable reality" then yes, science if effective to learn about observable reality.
You said omnipotence means being able to do anything including preventing evil and not taking free will in same time, which is self-contradictory.
Definitions of God - PHILOSOPHY DUNGEON (weebly.com)
Experience is very much individual thing, obviously those people who voted to defund the library have very different experience than what's your experience,
and it seems like you neither feel nor respect their experience? because otherwise you wouldn't suggest experience to have the final word...
Ah, and who is responsible to say what is considered an abuse? can you really exclude morality in deciding what's abuse? how doesn't this lead to subjectivism?
OK, your analogy fits into your previous post where you gave an example of science gone wrong and was then "fixed" later...
If that's so then there is no such thing as objective truth, simply because we must wait for future times when science will get better to understand better, but then also...
Unless somebody invites someone to date I see no reason to proclaim your sexual preferences, because obviously neither a gay nor straight person would be happy to date each other.
I don't think it would be wise to debate over this, however you can do some research online if you're really...
I don't think confirmation bias if of big issue since one can always research for arguments which go against proposed thesis.
Also one who is really devoted into constructing strong arguments will make sure to account for arguments which could be used against his thesis and then there is not...
Welcome to RF.
There is a saying: "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing"
The true meaning being that, thinking I know prevents me from digging deeper to know more.
In quest for truth therefore one must be ready to temporarily sacrifice it's beliefs because beliefs make you think...
Objective truth is truth which is independent of one's belief or perception, that is, things which are true remains true regardless of what one believes or does.
However I would distinguish 2 kinds of objective truths, one is that which can be used as a priori argument and another one is which...
VPN would work only if server is stationed in eastern countries, same for proxy, but most VPN users in western world use the service hosted in western countries.
Secondary problem then is that VPN servers or proxies are easily blocked.
I have only recently find one free proxy program which...