Hah, you tell that to G. Bush who falsely claimed Iraq has WMD just to justify war.
He succeeded to make justification but there is no honor in such wars.
You seem to be very affected by mainstream media.
Do yourself a favor and read from multiple sources, it will help you to make better judgements.
That is one of the most sarcastic events and proof that it all started with the US:
US official gives cookies to pro-EU protesters (euobserver.com)...
Yes it would be justification but I don't think anyone would be happy to provoke nuclear war,
these things are handled with mutual agreements like START rather than going to war.
nuclear weapons are one big exception due to what it could happen.
ex. Justification of G. Bush to attack Iraq was...
I meant approval of people.
There are many people in the west, ex. in Europe who see Russian war is justified.
Reason why approval of people matters is because to start war you need approval of people.
Imagine you being president willing to start war where your nation isn't willing to fight...
Of course it's a perfectly valid casus belli.
The purpose of justification for war or casus belli is to gain public approval, not only domestic but also foreign.
Hitler for example had no justification to attack France, Soviets and others, which was globally seen as dishonorable (by the public)...
People will always choose safety over no safety, and anarchy provides no safety.
Global anarchy just isn't possible.
Even if global anarchy happens it would soon result in groups of people willing to impose their will on others, ex. under pretense to defend them self from vandals.
Given the...
Crimea has major military port Sevastopol which was built by Russia, since the purpose of Revolution of Dignity was to make Ukraine pro western and thus anti Russian this mean this military port could then be used against Russia in the future.
This is clearly military threat and annex of Crimea...
Obviously that was the deal in exchange for soviet nuclear arsenal that was on their territory.
However, Ukraine whished that the US deploy nuclear weapons to country, therefore ukies broke the deal and thus there was no reason that the other side should continue to respect the deal.
You're...
Anarchy means absence or rule of law.
Everyone can do what ever they want, you defend your self however you can and survive how ever you know, the law of the Jungle rules anarchy.
Then the US should return Texas back to Mexico, and all the lands back to natives, don't you agree?
I mean taking land from people isn't OK, right?
The only land that is truly American is Alaska which they legally bought.
That is for your information so that you see Crimea was never Ukrainian...
In anarchic system there would be no police or juridical system to protect you,
bad guys would come and take from you what ever they want.
What would you do?
Who would you call?
Crimea is inhabited by Russians and was won over by then Russian empire before Ukraine even existed.
Originally it was inhabited by Tatars but never by Ukrainians or "Kyevan Rus" people.
Beside that those Russians living there wanted to join Russia not because of Russian threat but rather due...