• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    To me , 0 is not a number it is the representation of absolute and everything is relative to the absolute . Numbers greater than 0 are arbitrary but relative , they represent quantity etc which we would struggle without . I suppose all numbers above 0 have the same value in the sense of...
  2. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    There is quite a few like Subduction on science forums , they often gang together to get people banned who won't agree with false theory etc . It's a shame too , I have seen some really good theories out there by the average Joe but they are often mocked and ignored .
  3. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Numbers have no value !
  4. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    You've not provided corrections , you have just made that up ! The only thing people have done is post some theories as if in some way they are evidence and falsify my 7 postulates . You or anyone else as demonstrated ''Jack'' , proven no falsity in my postulates . I will prove it now to...
  5. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    That is funny , not a single one of you science types have been able to demonstrate me incorrect in a very long time . You all avoid discussion and direct questions , I've challenged you all so many times and you always lose . I showed the speed of time is constant earlier , demonstrated...
  6. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I kick all your beeps but I can't even get a job working from home as a project advisor !
  7. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Lets address this and put it simply for our friend here who does not understand things can be at error . The semantics and notions of the actual experiments are interpreted incorrectly .
  8. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I'm sorry but you are like a robot and a stuck record who willfully avoids any questions and discussion , only replying with present information , the very information that I am pointing out is at error in semantics . This is what you are doing me - This is at error you - this me - yes...
  9. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Nope ! You're trying to bury the truth with gibberish and ignoring the questions posed to you . I've already explained your semantics of these experiments are incorrect , you are not willing to be corrected . My clock measures 00:00:00 July 1st 2020 , you have been gone a year and a half...
  10. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    No, you are talking crap , I've already told you and demonstrated that there is no change in time , no time dilation . I will prove it some more . You travel away from me 00:00:00 Jan 1st 2019 and you are going to return precisely 1 year later according to your clock at 00:00:00 Jan 1st 2020...
  11. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    We simultaneously start our clocks at 00:00:00 and you return at 00:00:05 according to your clock , my clock says 00:00:10 You have been gone 1.s not 1/2 a second .
  12. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    No you don't ! Lets be precise now , 1) You can't see the light beam unless there is a medium that reflects light such as smoke 2) Any light you see is a direct linearity to your eyes 3) The light clock beam simultaneously exists with you 4) Any slower measurement simultaneously experiences...
  13. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It's rubbish in fact, we don't need that to explain it takes an amount of time to travel a distance at a constant speed and it will take more time to travel greater the distance at the same constant speed .
  14. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Light takes more time to travel a longer length ! The zig zag XY frame is a longer length than the imaginary 1.s Y-frame It means nothing ....
  15. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Yeah ok , you're just pushing to pick my brain ! I have demonstrated it by contracting the imaginary frame to a Planck length and using time Planck . You don't observe any zig zag , you observe a linearity and a time constant ...... Einstein is a cheat ,
  16. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I drew the zig zag line didn't I ? I understand the parlor trick and that is why I easily demonstrated it is incorrect and a parlor trick . The trick is that Einstein always puts a 1.s imaginary frame in and the action is within that frame . You have been deceived by observer effect ! He does...
  17. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I have workable physics for photon torpedoes , a space ship that doesn't use rocket fuel , energy ideas and several other ideas . My notions all based on my theory and workable physics . The bias against me is because science is rather embarrassed that a nobody with no formal qualifications...
  18. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I am the best theoretical physicist this chitty little rock called Earth as ever seen ! My talents are greatly wasted ... (That comment excludes Tesla , he was great , )
  19. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Parlor tricks don't wash with me !
  20. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    You don't even know what your own experiments actually mean do you ? In the below diagram please explain to the viewers what they observe of both light clocks if the clocks are traveling left to right ! This should be good , I can't wait for your excuses .
Top