• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    So what ? I have no credentials and I am treated like an idiot , so you should treat him like an idiot !
  2. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It is quite surprising that some people think and act as if numbers are in some way magical when they're not ''all that'' . It is nice to meet somebody who thinks of numbers in the same way ! I have you a question , can you think of anyway to destroy space ?
  3. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I think education begins with understanding and not taking things out of proportion to the true meanings, 4.The meaning of maths and maths use dependencies and independences. We must remember that numbers are the invention of logical rules by humans to aid our existence. Numbers do not...
  4. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Like I have said before , science always lose to me and that is why they always ban me ! You have failed to provide evidence , the truth is you have none. Most of your stuff is made up and as no actual proof . I know , I have asked for over a decade for proofs and I have shown science lots of...
  5. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    A Nasa opinion is not any sort of evidence ! You haven't provided any evidence that space can be destroyed or created ! Be honest , do you know of anyway to destroy space ? That's a direct question , let's see if you can answer it honestly without the ''charades'' or ''dressing'' it up as...
  6. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It does me after experiencing science forums for over a decade ! You can't argue they have errors and may be incorrect in several areas . Well to be honest they are pretty clueless to reality and I even think some of them are science belief extremists .
  7. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Well , you conna eat technology ! Regardless that some technology works, that doesn't mean you have the correct understanding and correct semantics of the universe . I've done some of my own maths as you know ! My maths works too :p I never understood why science always thought / thinks I...
  8. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    The brain of energy occupying a void space giving purpose to nothingness . A hive mind , where all is connected by quantum entanglement ! Added - Without us and other things God / space has no meaningful purpose , that would mean the meaning of life is to be Gods purpose ! A purpose which was...
  9. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    A pull is not a propulsion , propulsion is thrust , you know like those primitive glorified firework rockets you use . A pull is a gravitational force of attraction in lights causality of motion ! Light is a binary energy and it as to be or it wouldn't do no work . P.s I don't need to know all...
  10. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    No you haven't ! Like always the direct questions are ignored , a typical politicians move and side tracked with irrelevant material . I asked you earlier to start here : 1) Space cannot be created or destroyed You failed at 1 and provided no evidence to the contrary , physical or logical !
  11. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Scientifically and logically , yes !
  12. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Nope , I know all your theory malarkey and I've advanced them to be much more accurate and correct in the semantics . Photons / light has no propulsion ! Light is pulled out of a light bulb by the lesser energy field in the space . Momentum c is equal to the lesser energy P(c) = <E
  13. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    HMMM, you don't know as much as you think you do . We have atomic matter and field matter , photons are field matter . They have presence and mass and can apply a force . However they do not have propulsion , they are quanta that traverse through the field ''ether'' and their mechanism of...
  14. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Oh no you haven't , you have not show that space has physicality ! Do you know what physicality means? It has physical presence, it is matter !
  15. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It's wrong that my postulates are really simple ? Huh ? They are very simple , which one don't you understand ? Which one are you in denial about ? Which one can you show evidence to the contrary ? I'll even accept something logical ! 14 pages now and still no provided evidence to the...
  16. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It is definitely self evident about space unless you can show evidence to the contrary of the postulates . In example have you known , ever observed any space to have aged or decayed ?
  17. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    The brain ! They are not properties of space they are our relative measurements of space . Of course , we do and can measure space but that is still not a property of space . Well not how I see it , I see a property is something that belongs to something . I.e an electron is a property of...
  18. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Space has no physical properties , what you are talking about is called physical properties but it is not physical properties . As a measure yes , as physicality no . Postulate 7 says 7) Space has no physicality You've got me arguing about something I have not said in my postulates . Do...
  19. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    You really have a problem with the correct semantics don't you ?
  20. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    There's no projection , denying the self evidently true is kinda absurd !
Top