• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I have demonstrated , not forced anything , I have just explained the reality that needs no assertion . It is truthful and fact ! It quite clearly demonstrates there is no slowing down or speeding up of time . P.s Yes I can also falsify the Lorentz length contraction and Einsteins light...
  2. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Like I said , science is never willing to listen to pointed out errors , you are so clueless , honestly ! I have already demonstrated that time does not speed up or slow down and the correct semantics is a timing dilation , not a time dilation ! The out of synchronization timing of time does...
  3. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Huh ? Can you read English ? You seem to be reading a completely different thing than I am writing . I already know your game though and it is to bury stuff in the thread . I'll just bump my post back to the top and show that time speeding up and slowing down is mediocre minded garbage ...
  4. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I was thinking more a test to show me correct ! If the test fails then I'm incorrect but the test is huge and dangerous . Wipe us all out dangerous .....
  5. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It's a formula , you put the units in , it's charge and infinite space q- / k = 0 It's not difficult
  6. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    No, my equation to my theory explains the process , I am using and devised maths as a language . A / k explains the event action , think about that ! A / k = negative electrostatic mono pole point charge divided by infinite space That is not difficult to understand !
  7. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    A / k = 0 Start here A = neg electrostatic charge k= infinite space
  8. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I can do design dimensions etc, my math works with my theory , it is you who doesn't understand my math because it is new , and just like I didn't know your neg equation , you don't know my equation . But I listened to you and self corrected , learned your equation .
  9. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It was one I had not seen before or used before , you told me it equates to a positive , so I simply remembered that and mimicked it . It is hardly physics , numbers are arbitrary , understanding is far more important .
  10. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    You're not even willing to hear the error and understand the correct semantics ! Let me give you something to ponder over if you can think, both clocks exist simultaneously always . Both clocks always experience the longer time line . The shorter miss-timing measurement is not relevant in...
  11. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I can do maths , I can learn maths , I don't need to learn maths as I have no use for it , I need my own maths for my own theories .
  12. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    -3
  13. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    13 Still a needless equation though
  14. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    You are burying the diagram and ignoring the questions I ask you . Replying with Dogma ...
  15. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    What you're really doing is spamming the thread in gibberish to hide my important posts, knowing people will not read all the pages and often will only read the latest posts .
  16. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I can do some maths and you lie !
  17. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    In a re-run of the first measure , the experimenters decide to swap the clocks around ..........1.s .....0.5s First experiment t (A ) = 0.5s t (B) = 1.s Second experiment t (A) = 0.5s t (B) = 1.s t (A) total = 1.5s t (B) total = 1.5s ok so far , do you agree with the maths ?
  18. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    You'll never learn , I know what Wiki says ! Do you want to learn or not ? I'm tying to show you the error !
  19. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Ok , I will demonstrate time does not slow down or speed up .....0.5s ..........1.s These two clocks start timing at the same time , the first clock ticks slower than the second clock . Ok so far, do you understand that and the ''diagram'' ?
  20. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I can demonstrate Albert's errors my dear chap ! The same as I demonstrate sciences errors . How about I demonstrate that time does not slow down or speed up ?
Top