You've touched it. The second amendment needs to be updated to better define many ambiguities and antiquated definitions of the past.
What do you believe is the essence of the second amendment? Is it about gun control or liberties?
And, sure if you want a pistol, I wouldn't argue that you...
Do you want to talk about the amendments or not?
Otherwise, you can save your one liners for other folks.
If you're going to suggest to me, to not touch the amendments, I would expect a reasonable why behind that.
Ok, I can agree with you on the generally.
But I feel strongly that some of our amendments are antiquated and can be updated to serve our modern lives better.
Just stating that something is good could be inferred as it is good enough, which I'm not saying you've done.
But our amendments can...
You are objectively stating that the amendments have served EVERYONE well?
But I find it particular that you've chosen "observation" as your concluding response. How many people have you observed in such cases?
Did it really take this long to realize how flawed the EC is?
I could have politely told you this when I first learned of the EC.
The EC is a relic of a government and culture that is long gone. The same can be said of some of the amendments.
It doesn't take a genius to do something that we...
Trump's lawyers, especially Rudy, says one thing to the public but completely omits some of these same claims in courts. Or they do make the claims in court with little to no real evidence. They have circumstantial evidence or witness claims on a minute scale that could not influence the...
Stop with these speculations.
Follow the actual court cases.
Rudy is the lawyer who's job is to promote and prove election fraud. It is not his job to be objective. Literally, he is being paid to promote one side. Is that enough of conflict of interest to suggest?
So posting anything from...
I can't argue with your points. I vote by what's said and promised, and yes, many times it ends up being fluff even from a democratic candidate.
It's always about voting for the lesser of two evils or who can do less damage.
As an engineer, I value science the most so the "existential issues"...
Let me ask you then and please don't take it personally.
You are making decisions through actions for yourself and your family based on arbitrary beliefs? There is no value system of right or wrong through these actions?
So you vote for candidates and for policies disregarding if they are...
This isn't an arbitrary decision.
Let me double back to my original point.
Your opinions are inherently suggesting a value to yourself. If you only kept your opinions to yourself, then sure, it's all relative to the next person.
However, once you act on your opinions, your beliefs, and your...
That's the point of discussion. You voted so you are stating that your beliefs are best. The chain of beliefs to actions prove this.
Taxes hurt my business and I'm in a high tax bracket, so I did not vote for myself or my family per se.
I don't get much of the benefits of a left-leaning...
Not sure why you need to bring generalizations concerning age and Hitler into this discussion.
I hope when you vote, you are sure that what you are voting for is the right thing for all of us. If not for all of us, at least its the right thing for you and your loved ones. The consequences of...
That's conflicting...
It's inherent for beliefs to be favorable or to be of higher moral ground. Morality is subjective. So you as a libertarian is inherently and subjectively stating that your beliefs of libertarianism is better than the rest.
You might not physically tell others that your...
Well, if I mentioned "you" in the previous post then it was meant as a "general you."
If one didn't vote for Trump this round, then yes, I would stop consider that one a Trump supporter.
Frankly, I like some libertarian ideals and eventually would like to support independents, but let's be...