You obviously had more time to debunk every aspect than I. I'm tending to follow your reasoning as most accurate in view of what's been offered. Thank you.
And once again, as in my other thread, history has taken a greater preeminence over theology.
There seems to be a whole lot of speculaten goin on here. Since there are very few footnotes to accompany the article, particularly the more speculative aspect of the presentation, I'm having trouble having any desire to pursue this article. Especially since one of the first things offered is...