So yes, I extend personhood to a bunch of other animals too, though not cows - they taste too good! But seriously, it boils down to the question of souls/spirits - I believe there is a categorical difference between the soul/spirit of a human/non-human primate (and one or two other animals) on...
For me, all persons have the right to non-interference with their liberty, life, and property. Deliberately killing a person without due cause constitutes murder. I believe that personhood extends from conception to death (not brain death, which I don't recognise as death) of a human being...
I'm not saying that, I'm just saying that polls and poll findings are rarely suitably nuanced when it comes to complicated things like belief/religion. Therefore, we can't necessarily take them at face value, and certainly can't use them as the basis for making decisions about how to treat all...
I don't believe it is the separateness or otherwise of an entity (embryo, foetus, infant) that should determine how we should treat that entity, but rather when personhood begins, which I believe to be at conception. For me, that means that killing an embryo, foetus, or infant is equivalent...
I'm afraid you've lost me with your first point above.
Wrt the latter, it's not so much taking people at their word as how the questions in a poll are posed and what the respondents' understandings of the questions are.
I don't think Christianity is dead here, by any means. Perhaps fewer literalists than in the US. But Christianity takes many forms, as I'm sure you know.
I don't see how that's relevant.
Not necessarily. It depends who's doing the labelling. A Muslim country can be one by virtue of having a majority Muslim population.
There's no telling whether European Muslims understand what Sharia actually is or would mean for them or whether they accept...