Okay, here's your original post.
My questions again:
1) Please explain why infanticide is wasteful (I know this is technically not a question, but I could easily frame it so).
2) Why is it unkind (if it's a viable infant)?
3) Wrt your last point above, do you have the same opinion of embryos...
Evidence please.
Perhaps because the majority of those Muslims living in the West are here because they don't want to live in a theocracy? Or as a result of exposure to alternative ways of thinking about things?
Evidence please. Moreover, this is just one country.
Please explain.
I'm not sure all people would find it necessarily hard to do (depending to an extent on how it is carried out). A parent needn't necessarily do it.
Every person? What of the Hitlers of this world?
Why so?
Not if carried out in a humane manner.
Do you have the same...
The next one in what might become a series..
As with the previous one ('What's wrong with incest?'), the question is pretty self-explanatory. And you might think the answer is too obvious to even bother engaging with this. But I believe there is some mileage to be had here.
PS
Trouble with such reasoning is that you exclude posters who are saying unpopular things (which can still be entirely reasonable and make one think about things, or how to argue one's corner better). And things can be unpopular if the forum as a whole, or a particular thread, is dominated by...
Right, but not every Muslim necessarily follows every twist and turn of the Koran or Hadith or even necessarily knows what the Koran or Hadith say on the matter. So you will find plenty of Muslims - perhaps even the majority - who don't see a contradiction between their faith and being a good...
Except there are plenty of Muslims who don't seem to have a problem thinking of themselves as both Muslims and citizens/nationals of a non-Muslim country. It's not necessarily an either/or.
Assuming it is done in a humane manner and the blood and/or meat are consumed afterwards, I believe it is better than the slaughter of animals for food where there is no religious element as I believe it is important to remember the religious/spiritual dimension of all things (I believe there is...
All well and good in those times, but situations change, meaning that what was once sensible/wise advice may no longer apply.
Wrt incest, you seem to only be focusing on incest that has a sufficiently high chance of resulting in the birth of children..
But all this speaks only against sexual intercourse that has a sufficiently high chance of resulting in the birth of children - what about same-sex sexual relations, or sexual relations where at least one of the parties is infertile/sterile?
Why do you believe that sharing great great grandparents is as close as one should get?
Obviously, if your bottom line is 'God forbids it, therefore it is wrong', I can't really argue with that.