Agreed.
It must mean "without any possibility whatsoever for error," correct?
Apparently so. Imagine a Bible that came with a guarantee. It must be like that.
Q. - Has anyone ever had the cojones to print a Bible with a money-back guarantee?
Individual personal experiences don't qualify...
No.
Change the equation slightly and see if it makes more sense with different inputs:
Q. - Should little children be held accountable for the sexual feelings of catholic priests?
...
I'm going to assert that it doesn't make sense to hold Party A accountable for the "sexual feelings" of...
"When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations--the Hittites, Girga****es, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites, seven nations larger and stronger than you--and when the LORD your God has delivered them over...
Perhaps deeply religious people cannot be expected to make rational evaluations?
However, our Constitution is very clear on this issue:
"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the...
As I said, failure to cite a peer-reviewed source that makes the claim that DNA was derived from rocks will be viewed as a tacit admission that the claim you made is unsubstantiated.
...
Anyway, unless you believe that God had no choice but to create the universe, aren't you still obliged to...
"Not guilty" is a far cry from "innocent" and (unless you're The Dukes of Hazzard) fleeing the scene is never a great way to prove your innocence.
Where there's smoke, there's fire. Joseph Smith's laundry list of legal troubles paints the picture of a known con man, not a messiah. It's a...
Unfortunately, after a wild claim like that, the rest of your post will have to wait. You now have two options:
1.) Cite a peer-reviewed, scientific source that supports your claim that rocks turned into DNA and amino acids.
2.) Concede that you simply made a wild, unsubstantiated claim...
According to the mighty wikipedia, the known facts concerning Joseph Smith are disturbing:
March 20, 1826 - charged with being a "disorderly person." Results appear to have been disputed.
June 1830 - Charged with being a "disorderly person." Found Not Guilty.
June 1830 - Charged again with...
Of course you do.
I find that rather difficult to believe.
Ibid.
Before you accuse me of philosophical hypocrisy, it would be might polite of you to inform me of exactly what my philosophy is.
Thank you in advance for whatever you're your answer turns out to be.
Be sure to add that to...
It doesn't specifically give all praise and credit to an alleged-to-exist supernatural being. For starters. Y'all.
Well, first of all, it can't happen. Secondly, it can't happen because the Bible doesn't mention it. So it can't happen. Third, some people insist that they didn't come from...
"F'tang you very much!"
Ever try arguing against something that you have no conception of?
"Our" communication is a product of your mind. I don't exist. I'm only responding because your mind seeks entertainment.
Need I remind you that it's your syllogism?
Sorry. It isn't trolling...
Is that a question or a declaration?
I beg your pardon, but I'm not providing any miracles whatsoever.
As opposed to claiming a miracle has occurred for reasons that are impossible or improbably, or even unlikely?
Of course you don't. You didn't reach your beliefs through reason, so it...
Is it accurate to say that there is a concept that gods don't exist? Plug that into your syllogism and see how it works out.
No we don't. You've handily provided the solution to hard solipsism:
1.) Other people are concepts.
2.) Concepts exist.
3.) Therefore, other people exist.
I cannot...