The first thing to consider is there are different ideas in physics that point to a mulitverse, one is the many worlds interpretation of QM. The work that is being done now has nothing to do with that. Instead its looking for data from a different type of multiverse idea.This comes from...
No the ionosphere and magneteopshere are not layers of the atmopshere,
atmospheric layers are defined by differential methods of heating, what defintion of layer of the atmopshere are you using that justifies the inclusion of the ionopshere and magnetosphere? , here are some real science...
Hi we have made a video debunking the Kalam argument , the link is below :
‪skydivephil's Channel‬‏ - YouTube
If you would like to discuss any of the issues regarding this argument, we are happy to do so.
But you have to assume that a higher authority exists, it might not.
You have to assume that you can correctly identify the higher authority, you may not be able to .
Your original post is a straw man, science does not claim perfect knoweldge. Never the less ,its the best method we have to...
If you go on google scholar and type string theory, filter the results for dates after 2008 , u get 69,700 results
string theory - Google Scholar
an interesting artile is here:
String Theory Finally Does Something Useful | Wired Science | Wired.com#
I think there's not doubnt that its...
Hi I have made a video debunking the fine tuning argument for god. The link is here, hope you like:
rt-UIfkcgPY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rt-UIfkcgPY
Nevertheless this is not a small minortiy view in the Muslim World. As a Muslim I hope you can be more persuasive in perusading your fellow Muslims that evoluiton, including human evolution, is not something to be rejected. I would suspect that denying a key part of modern science is damging to...
This is not my interpretation but Adam Deen's. His original post was attacking a fellow Muslim who embraces evolution. If you check the video out, or the blog, linked to in the original post above, you will see.
The multiverse is considered plausible becuase its seems an almost inetivatble conseuqence of inflationary cosmology which has good evidence behind it. What's that got to do with ID?
I'm writing abut a Muslim blogger Adam Deen. He posted an article attacking a fellow Muslim's article in the Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/11/religion.darwinbicentenary
The article in the Guardian suggested Muslim should accept evolution and reject fundamentalism...
Take the theory of evolution, no one is claiming it is absolute truth. The claim is that it is overwhelmingly supported by mutliple lines of evidence. Of course if new evidence comes to light that contradicts the existing evidence the theory may need to be modified or even abandoned. But until...
Its not me theat made a specific refcerence to 6,000 years. Ist the Qur'an that specifically says 6 days. You said the purpose of saying 6 days was to avoid monotony , are you now back tracking and giving us a different meaning? Ill ask you again, how would saying the Earth was made over...
Lets face facts. The Qur’an said something quote specific and it got it wrong. Now your only way out is to say it didn’t mean what it said. Now how do you know what the author meant? Why would the text be any less monotonous if it said created the Earth over a vast expanse of time ...
But fi they aree not specific periods of time, why specify 6 of them? It makes no sense to specifiy a partricular number if the duration of the period is unknown.
I agree Bowman needs to answer you question. But perhaps you could answer mine. The scientific evidence is that the Earth took more than hundred million years to form.
http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v3/n6/full/ngeo883.html
But the Quran says the Earth was created in 6 days.
So it seems...