Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Israel has a record of removing the human rights of Palestinian people and forcefully expelling them from their homes.
SOURCES: World Report 2019: Rights Trends in Israel and Palestine
1948 Palestinian exodus - Wikipedia
This is attempting genocide against the Palestinian people.
Or it's a Twitter account that posted the tweet before all the facts came out.
Again, stop jerking your knee.
How many civilian died?I didn't claim that you said that Palestine is the only one who suffers. Israel has money, true. And yet terrorists in Gaza find the money to buy rockets and other weapons (apparently, the rockets fired yesterday cost upwards of $6,000,000) and fire them at Israeli civilians.
I wrote "apparently" but I'm also not claiming to be a source for news. I am currently doing some research on the costs. The baseline is close to 400,000 dollars but I don't have all the number in yet.accurate like the ridiculous claim that the home made rockets cost 6 miilion dollars??
I assure you, this is absolutely no fun whatsoever.Oh so now it's only attempted genocide. Well isn't this a fun turn of events.
Claim whatever you like.Okay now explain to me why I should care about HRW? You do realise that HRW is in the pockets of the Arab countries right? That they get lot's of donations from these countries?
You realize that genocide isn't a singular thing, right? It's not like there's a "genocide gun" that when you pull the trigger: "Boom! Instant genocide!" and then you can point to that and say "Look! They used genocide!"I also searched the page for the term "genocide" and could not locate it.
A specific race targeted for displacement.And the Palestinian exodus? People tend to get displaced during times of war.
Nobody is claiming any kind of war or retaliation is justified. I'm just pointing out that Israel has committed and is committing genocide.A few years earlier 12 million Germans lost their homes because of it and yet they don't try to start a war with Poland or the Czech Republic to reclaim these territories.
Again, nobody is justifying any specific atrocity. I just want you to acknowledge Israel's.Meanwhile the Arabs themselves displaced their own Jews with a slightly bigger number than Arabs that were displaced.
With of course the difference that these Jews lived from Morocco to Yemen and had absolutely nothing to do with the war.
Yet they were killed, abducted, had their property stolen from them and finally displaced.
So, to you, acknowledging genocide is whining?So how do I say this without coming of harsh: Stop whining.
Knee. Jerk. Stop.And of course you are okay with their lying.
Except you have no idea what their sources were.So this happened
- Rocket hits building
- AI immediately condemns Israel for the attack
- it comes out that it actually wasn't Israel that attacked the building
- AI calls for an investigation
I have no idea. Maybe their source told them it was an Israeli rocket.Why thy hypocrisy? Why didn't they immediately condemn the Islamic Jihad for this attack?
Or maybe I'm just not convinced a global organization dedicated to human rights deliberately put out a knowingly false Tweet only to completely undermine said Tweet hours later when more information becomes available.The best part about this is that you are still on their side and don't speak out against their obvious bias.
Mostly i am against America support of Israel yesHamas has pretty much done nothing in this whole ordeal.
Islamic Jihad got their Commander of Northern Gaza killed and then showered Israel with rockets.
Then Israel retaliated and you began to whine about Israel's retaliation.
Nothing you do is in any way new. You are just another anti-Israel poster who claims to have no problem with Israeli civilians or Jews. Yet you have a problem with Israel defending its citizens.
Does that matter? What is the threshhold which makes it worth caring about?How many civilian died?
I wrote "apparently" but I'm also not claiming to be a source for news. I am currently doing some research on the costs. The baseline is close to 400,000 dollars but I don't have all the number in yet.
It matter when Israel airstrik of my friends in Palestine dies yesDoes that matter? What is the threshhold which makes it worth caring about?
Does that matter? What is the threshhold which makes it worth caring about?
The Qassam's (the cheapest of the cheap) are in the $800 range. They, though, would not be able to travel as far as rockets have been traveling, so the Katyushas seem to be in play and they, in 10 year old numbers, cost up to $2000. But I sense that there are the Palestinian equivalent of the Fajr-5's being used. I'm trying to get a price on those.I'm guessing closer to $500 for one of those crappy, underpowered missiles.
So enough Israelis have to die for you to care about attacks on civilians?It matter when Israel airstrik of my friends in Palestine dies yes
Not to someone hit by either one.Its pretty easy to tell the difference between a huge Israeli missile going off, and a Palestinian bottle rocket with 5 or 10 lbs of explosive.
So 150 missiles, how the heck did someone come up with 6 miilion dollar cost??The Qassam's (the cheapest of the cheap) are in the $800 range. They, though, would not be able to travel as far as rockets have been traveling, so the Katyushas seem to be in play and they, in 10 year old numbers, cost up to $2000. But I sense that there are the Palestinian equivalent of the Fajr-5's being used. I'm trying to get a price on those.
Apparently he had read about a cost approaching 10,000. I have asked him for clarification and a source and won't disseminate the claim in the future without more information. His statement was "I read that each rocket costs between $10,000-$100,000. At the rate they’ve been firing and using the higher price in that range, the math more or less works." He has yet to provide his source and is being taken to task for posting what he posted. I regret reposting his claim without investigating first.So 150 missiles, how the heck did someone come up with 6 miilion dollar cost??
The Nazis were voted into power in 1932 not 1934
Apparently he had read about a cost approaching 10,000. I have asked him for clarification and a source and won't disseminate the claim in the future without more information. His statement was "I read that each rocket costs between $10,000-$100,000. At the rate they’ve been firing and using the higher price in that range, the math more or less works." He has yet to provide his source and is being taken to task for posting what he posted. I regret reposting his claim without investigating first.
Claim whatever you like.
You realize that genocide isn't a singular thing, right? It's not like there's a "genocide gun" that when you pull the trigger: "Boom! Instant genocide!" and then you can point to that and say "Look! They used genocide!"
Genocide is the attempted destruction, in whole or in part, of a racial, ethnic, religious or national group through, among other things, direct harm against members of that group, the removal of rights from that group, deliberately inflicting difficult living conditions upon that group or imposing restrictions intended to make living more difficult for that group.
A government targeting a specific ethnic/religious/national group for removal of rights, eviction, denial of service and travel restrictions fits the legal definition of genocide according to the UN.
SOURCE: https://www.un.org/ar/preventgenocide/adviser/pdf/osapg_analysis_framework.pdf
A specific race targeted for displacement.
I.E genocide.
Again, nobody is justifying any specific atrocity. I just want you to acknowledge Israel's.
Also, do you have any sources?
So, to you, acknowledging genocide is whining?
Except, of course, when it's "whining" about Palestine, right? I see you don't think the OP is "whining".
Knee. Jerk. Stop.
There's a difference between "lying" and "sending out a Tweet based on limited facts". We don't know who Tweeted that or what information they were privy to prior to Tweeting it. Alleging it was deliberate dishonesty is obviously completely unfounded.
Except you have no idea what their sources were.
Calm down already and stop "whining".
I have no idea. Maybe their source told them it was an Israeli rocket.
Stop whining.
Or maybe I'm just not convinced a global organization dedicated to human rights deliberately put out a knowingly false Tweet only to completely undermine said Tweet hours later when more information becomes available.
Again; calm down. Stop whining. People make mistakes. Twitter is not the right place to go to for accurate and thorough reportage.
I shouldn't have to point this out.
Mostly i am against America support of Israel yes
Practically any organization (or even individual) who says anything negative about Israel is accused of anti-Israel bias.It's even on wikipedia.
No. It commits genocide against Palestinians.So what you are saying is that the Israeli Government genocides its own people.
Re-read the definition of genocide I provided.Because Israeli citizens aren't allowed as per Israeli law to enter Area A of Judea and Samaria.
This directly hinders Jews from visiting or living in cities like Shechem (home of the Jewish site of Yosef's tomb) or Yericho (home to the ruins of the Hasmonean Winter Palaces).
The definition isn't lax. Your misreading of it is. Read it again, carefully.This lax interpretation of the word genocide also turns most of the 3rd world into genocidal countries.
Yet you never hear about it when it's about these areas.
I'm sorry you find it insulting to be asked for sources for your claims.The question alone is so incredibly insulting.
I have no interest in discrediting anything. I just want more information.Here have fun
You'll probably find lot's of ways to discredit the most minor fact.
Nope. I used the UN's definition of genocide.The liberal use of the word genocide diminishes actual genocides.
Which is of course the reason for doing so in the first place.
"People like me"?In case you are wondering, this is why Israelis do not care what people like you think.
When have I ever said that they never needed evidence? Where is the hypocrisy? Where have I defended AI beyond giving them the benefit of the doubt that it may not have been a deliberate lie rather than a case of misinformation?You don't even see the blatant hypocrisy.
They needed no evidence whatsoever to claim that it was Israel's fault and suddenly need evidence when its apparent that it wasn't Israel's fault.
They could have, but if the source they had told them it was Israel, why would they do that?They could've easily written that the building was struck and that it was still unclear who the perpetrator is.
For reasons that you don't know yet. Stop whining.They decided against that and claimed something wrong.
Because, as we all known, Israel has no allies anywhere who will defend it against any and all criticism and their entire government will collapse from a single tweet...And that is just typical. Now the claim is out into the world and in a few years it will be brought back to denounce Israel.
Because that's how the world is.
That's a lie. I've never once said we should "denounce the OP". I pointed out that the posts that followed were a direct result of OTHER POSTS made by the OP relating to Palestine/Israel.Out of curiosity since you talk about how we don't denounce the OP enough,
Great argument. People shouldn't be allowed to point out inaccurate statements unless they point out every single inaccurate statement everybody makes ever.when are you going to denounce Lyndon's lies about the so called "Palestinian Bottle Rockets"?