Now you're just being obtuse, and I refuse to play your game.
You claimed that I wrote genocide was just "restricting the movement of people and denying them service".]
That was a lie. I have proven it was a lie.
Apologize.
The day I apologise for pretty much anything to the likes of you is the day I convert to Islam and blow myself up in a bus.
It's not my job to explain to you how words work.
Estimated total number of Jews in 1945: 11 million.
Estimated total number of Jews today: 13.3 million.
SOURCE:
World Jewish Population | Latest Statistics
Yeah I slipped up with the post Shoah number. No idea what I was thinking.
The fact stands that there aren't more Jews today than prior to the Shoah.
Almost as if there was some kind of event.
My point is that just looking at population numbers tells you nothing about atrocities committed against that group and efforts to enact genocide on them. The actions of the Israeli government come under the UN definition of genocide.
I'm sorry you don't like that, but it is the truth. The Palestinian people have been targeted by the Israeli government for numerous human rights abuses in an effort to eliminate them as a group.
Once again, genocide doesn't have to be successful for it to be genocide. Are you not getting this point yet?
Okay so this is funny, Israel is just too stupid to genocide them?
Not to come off as sick but I think quite literally anyone can do it.
The Hutu's did it with just Machetes.
And if you look at the demographics of the Tutsi's you can see a sharp decline in numbers around 1994, which is really surprising as nothing dramatic happened in Rwanda around that time...
So where's the sharp decline for the Palestinians? Oh it doesn't exist.
Not because the Israelis aren't trying enough, they just aren't capable of killing them.
What's the Palestinian trick in all of this? I am sure everyone else would like to know how they shield themselves from Genocide.
You have yet to explain why it's hypocritical. You've said it was dishonest and biased, which it could be. But in what way is it hypocritical, specifically?
If you report on an identical event differently depending on who is involved it means there's a discrepancy, in this case hypocrisy.
But it really is okay, I fully realise that you don't see and will never see it.
People like you aren't in any way new to me. I encounter your like on my way to the Synagogue whenever something in Israel happens.
You're talking garbled nonsense.
Nah it's the truth. Go there and try your luck.
Nope. I never said that. In fact, I explicitly said that wasn't okay:
"If they just jumped to a conclusion, then they were irresponsible, biased and deserve scorn."
Also a lie. I never said that, nor would I ever.
I have yet to see any scorn from your side. It's all hypothetical.
Same as the outrage over Islamic Jihad.
Can you stop arguing with the voices in your head long enough to read my actual posts?
You mean the ones where you act as if the truth of the attack is some kind of big mystery that needs to be investigated?
We'll see. I don't see the value in jumping to conclusions in order to smear people.
Apparently, you do.
It's called experience. AI simply has that reputation.
Of course not among people like you. They of course write what you like to hear.
What did AI say again later? Oh right "conflicting reports".
I am not sure if a video of the incident is a report.
I think these things are called evidence.
You're just engaged in mindless conspiracy mongering. One Tweet that was subsequently walked back on (admittedly, too lightly and not quickly enough) does no indicate that an entire organization is a propaganda machine.
Case in point: the blatant lies you have told about me and my position. Were they honest mistakes or are you a propagandist, just as you allege AI as being? Perhaps you would jump to the conclusion that any incorrect statement is a deliberate lie if it's something you engage in a lot. We say we see the world as reflection of ourselves, I suppose.
You are free to educate yourself on the quality reporting AI and HRW do on Israel.
I know you won't do it but I have to present you that option even if it's a futile attempt.
