• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

6-year-old student shoots teacher in Virginia classroom, police say

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
No one else can give me as high of a standard of safety as myself. About 2% of home burglaries in the US result in a violent crime. That is about 50,000/year or 5+ per hour.
So not really a valid fear. Where do you live? Do you live in a poor area? if not your odds of being burglarized drops dramatically as do the odds of a burglary involving a violent crime. In fact the odds may be higher that you will hurt yourself or others accidentally with a gun than the odds of your being attacked in a burglary. That would make your fears not only poorly founded but irrational as well.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
So you admit societies that have strict gun laws still have illegal guns.
It's not something I've denied. I've simply asked you to prove your assumption that such would be the same case in America. You are absolutely able to form an assumption or a theory based on those facts, but that does not then become a fact until proven.[/quote]I don't think you want a serious conversation about guns. It is obvious there would be illegal guns in America. I live in America and I would have an illegal gun.


Uh huh. And why do you need a gun? Why do you need an option of lethality, rather than say a taser or pepper spray?
seriously? What am I going to do with a taser or pepper spray if the intruder has a gun? I have a better chance to protect my family if I have a gun.


A fear-based reason for owning a deadly weapon is a poor reason for owning said weapon.
How was my quote of:

"If I don't have a gun I am at a severe disadvantage to a person coming into my house to harm us whether they have a gun or not."

fear based? Is this not true unless you are a Navy seal or something?


In an ideal society the reasons people commit crime would be properly addressed, rather than your draconian "Lock them up better". But the Right consistently abhors ever having that discussion.
I have never said "Lock them up better". If you insist in an ideal society then yeah, that is not the world we live in.


Then those people are stupid, and prove the point that they should not own guns by being the point and the problem.
Calling people stupid for wanting to own a gun to protect themselves is a stupid comment.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
So not really a valid fear. Where do you live? Do you live in a poor area? if not your odds of being burglarized drops dramatically as do the odds of a burglary involving a violent crime. In fact the odds may be higher that you will hurt yourself or others accidentally with a gun than the odds of your being attacked in a burglary. That would make your fears not only poorly founded but irrational as well.
Not if you store your gun properly and have proper training on how to use it. Until the odds are zero it is rational to own a gun for safety if done properly.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Just about everything. If guns could be made cheaper elsewhere they would be. In fact they are. There is not much market for them because people for some odd reason tend to want a reliable firearm.
You forget in your world there would be no guns made in America. So illegal ones would only be available. Why wouldn't people buy them?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You forget in your world there would be no guns made in America. So illegal ones would only be available. Why wouldn't people buy them?
First off because they are illegal. Second because of the price. Guns are cheap for criminals only because they can be stolen and resold. They basic cost of a firearm would skyrocket if one could only depend upon smuggled ones. You are adding all sorts of costs to the process. A person could not bring in guns easily. They do tend to be made of metal and they are easily detected because of that. How do you think that they would be smuggled and by whom?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Not if you store your gun properly and have proper training on how to use it. Until the odds are zero it is rational to own a gun for safety if done properly.
Sorry, but then I could use the same conditions to your fears about being burglarized. You cannot make a simplistic odds argument and not realize that you could do the same thing to greatly reduce your odds of being burglarized. The number one way to greatly lower that risk is to have some sort of monitoring service. In other words if you are going to make an argument make a decent one. You need to be consistent in your use of modifications to the original argument.
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
seriously? What am I going to do with a taser or pepper spray if the intruder has a gun? I have a better chance to protect my family if I have a gun.
You're assuming an intruder would have a gun. In a completely fabricated hypothetical. That is not a strong defense to clutch your gun like so many pearls.

How was my quote of: "If I don't have a gun I am at a severe disadvantage to a person coming into my house to harm us whether they have a gun or not." fear based?
Because you fear intrusion. You fear that they'll have a gun, and senselessly mow down your family. You fear this, and as a result you're likely to have a fear-based response. Perhaps what you see as a gun, in this fear-induced state, is actually just a flashlight, and you end someone's life without need.

I have never said "Lock them up better".
Not in those exact words, but yes you did.

If you insist in an ideal society then yeah, that is not the world we live in.
Gee, I wonder why. And yet it is a nation that we could live in, especially as we're supposedly the Best and Richest Nation in the world.

Calling people stupid for wanting to own a gun to protect themselves is a stupid comment.
Yeah, to be clear I'm talking about people who are so senselessly wed to their iron that they would wage war on the government to keep their little pew pews. They would become the very thing that is contributing to more and more deaths each year - thankfully no more children today; it's been a good day.

If you think that thinking those people are stupid is, in turn, stupid, then I really cannot help you.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
First off because they are illegal. Second because of the price. Guns are cheap for criminals only because they can be stolen and resold. They basic cost of a firearm would skyrocket if one could only depend upon smuggled ones. You are adding all sorts of costs to the process. A person could not bring in guns easily. They do tend to be made of metal and they are easily detected because of that. How do you think that they would be smuggled and by whom?
The same way that illegal drugs enter the US, mainly through the southern border. Right now it is not hard to get into the US illegally. Why would guns be different? Maybe they would be more expensive, I am just asking questions.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Sorry, but then I could use the same conditions to your fears about being burglarized. You cannot make a simplistic odds argument and not realize that you could do the same thing to greatly reduce your odds of being burglarized. The number one way to greatly lower that risk is to have some sort of monitoring service. In other words if you are going to make an argument make a decent one. You need to be consistent in your use of modifications to the original argument.
Unless you can guarantee I will never be burglarized by someone with a gun I am not going to give up my best way to defend myself and my family.

I have never owned a gun in my life. Mainly because my kids were young and I was not comfortable having a gun in the house at that time. They are all older now and have been taught about guns, how to know if they are loaded, how to unload them, how to shoot them etc. That was a decision my wife and I made but I should have had the option all along to decide to have a firearm to protect my family if we thought we needed it. If someone comes into my house with a gun with the intent to harm and I have no gun what should I do?
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
You're assuming an intruder would have a gun. In a completely fabricated hypothetical. That is not a strong defense to clutch your gun like so many pearls.
Yes I am because that is the worst case scenario. This is how you must think about your personal safety. This does happen everyday in the US.


Because you fear intrusion. You fear that they'll have a gun, and senselessly mow down your family. You fear this, and as a result you're likely to have a fear-based response. Perhaps what you see as a gun, in this fear-induced state, is actually just a flashlight, and you end someone's life without need.
I don't have a fear or it. It is responsible to think about what if this happens, like I have said this occurs.


Not in those exact words, but yes you did.
I never said this.


Gee, I wonder why. And yet it is a nation that we could live in, especially as we're supposedly the Best and Richest Nation in the world.
You think we could ever live in a nation that has no crime? That is a foolish thought.


Yeah, to be clear I'm talking about people who are so senselessly wed to their iron that they would wage war on the government to keep their little pew pews. They would become the very thing that is contributing to more and more deaths each year - thankfully no more children today; it's been a good day.
Our society is still sick. When are you going to address that?

If you think that thinking those people are stupid is, in turn, stupid, then I really cannot help you.
Ok.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
"An ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of cure".

My point is what's vastly better for the average person in the long run is to think what will make them less prone to robbery or attack? Having a loaded gun in one's home is in most cases not a good move. And if one is assaulted outside the home, it's generally best to comply with what they want versus trying to fight them. However, this is not always true, thus using our head is very important.
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
Yes I am because that is the worst case scenario.
Yet not a certainty. In your fear-based response mindset, you might end up killing a teenager who just happened to enter the wrong house, or even a petty criminal who's completely unarmed. Which, you know, is denying them their right to due process. Murder is not a rational answer.

I never said this.
Funny, because that's your quote. Would you care to elaborate on just what pushing for cash-only bail and longer sentences would be, then?

You think we could ever live in a nation that has no crime?
Not what I said. If you go back and read what I wrote, I said the reasons people commit crime would be properly addressed.

Our society is still sick. When are you going to address that?
About four days ago.

"Medicare for all, including comprehensive mental care. Social programs for rehabilitation, rather than Corporate-owned institutions for incarceration (the prison industrial complex) that is a pipeline for gang affiliation, white supremacy, and domestic terrorism. Proper allocation of funds for sufficient education. A livable minimum wage to ensure a decrease of poverty rates. Equitable housing to decimate homelessness."

Among many other things.

By the by, two more children under the age of 11 have been injured by guns since yesterday. Thankfully no more deaths, yet, but I would sadly not hold out hope that number will remain at 13.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Unless you can guarantee I will never be burglarized by someone with a gun I am not going to give up my best way to defend myself and my family.

I have never owned a gun in my life. Mainly because my kids were young and I was not comfortable having a gun in the house at that time. They are all older now and have been taught about guns, how to know if they are loaded, how to unload them, how to shoot them etc. That was a decision my wife and I made but I should have had the option all along to decide to have a firearm to protect my family if we thought we needed it. If someone comes into my house with a gun with the intent to harm and I have no gun what should I do?
That reasoning is irrational.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The same way that illegal drugs enter the US, mainly through the southern border. Right now it is not hard to get into the US illegally. Why would guns be different? Maybe they would be more expensive, I am just asking questions.
No, drugs are very very different. They do not compare.. Drugs are simple,light, and pound for pound about one hundred times the value of guns.
 

pearl

Well-Known Member
Has there been any decision on what possessed this child to do this? At six years old right and wrong certainly does not tell the story. What was the influence, family discussions of news headline, anger toward this particular teacher? The child does not have the capacity to anticipate consequences.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Yet not a certainty. In your fear-based response mindset, you might end up killing a teenager who just happened to enter the wrong house, or even a petty criminal who's completely unarmed. Which, you know, is denying them their right to due process. Murder is not a rational answer.
Due process is to ensure the government treats every citizen fairly. Has nothing to do with this situation. I never said shoot anyone that enters my house.


Funny, because that's your quote. Would you care to elaborate on just what pushing for cash-only bail and longer sentences would be, then?
Funny you never actually quote me you just say what I said. Post my quote where I said this and I can elaborate.


Not what I said. If you go back and read what I wrote, I said the reasons people commit crime would be properly addressed.[

About four days ago.

"Medicare for all, including comprehensive mental care. Social programs for rehabilitation, rather than Corporate-owned institutions for incarceration (the prison industrial complex) that is a pipeline for gang affiliation, white supremacy, and domestic terrorism. Proper allocation of funds for sufficient education. A livable minimum wage to ensure a decrease of poverty rates. Equitable housing to decimate homelessness."

Among many other things.
How will these things eliminate violent crime? I may agree with some of these things but it will not stop the need for self protection.

By the by, two more children under the age of 11 have been injured by guns since yesterday. Thankfully no more deaths, yet, but I would sadly not hold out hope that number will remain at 13.
I agree we have a problem with gun violence. I disagree getting rid of gun ownership is the answer.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Seriously. Look int all of the risks of owning a handgun, and then compare them to the risks of a violent robbery. Add in where you live and you will almost certainly see that violent robbery rate drop dramatically. The reason that I said that your reasoning is irrational is because you refuse to do a proper analysis of this.
 
Top