• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A huge problem with the JW religion:

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Paul wouldn't contradict himself-Hebrews 10:26--No sacrifice left for any who practice a sin. False reasoning makes the contradictions. As 1Cor 6:9-11 is clear in the statement--This is what some of you were ( past tense) they repented( stopped) doing sins. That one is still deserving of death. Jesus sacrifice covers the little flock( 144,000 to heaven) and the great crowd( other sheep) who will not taste death. Those who practice sin( worker of iniquity) will hear these words as judgement-Matthew 7:21-23-- no matter what mortal tells them they are saved or born again.
Paul and Matthew are two completely different things. Plus, Paul acknowledges no fictional 144,000
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
In the greek Lexicon-- Ho Theos= The God is in the second line at John 1:1--Plain Theos is in the last line--the difference--Ho Theos= The true living God--plain Theos = a god. Carrying the biblical meaning--- Has godlike qualities. This is why- John 5:30, Coll 1:15, Acts 2:22)--- Otherwise in simple English according to trinity translation in the second line reads--And God swas with God--The bible isclear--There is one God--And at Rev 3:12-- trinity religions must teach--God has a God( another God=HS over there) but there is only One God.
Nope. Again, your faulty interpretation.
 

kjw47

Well-Known Member
I just backed the words with scripture.


The fault is. Most refuse to believe Jesus.
Anyone can cherry pick "facts". The challenge is to come up with a consistent and rational explanation.


I came up with Facts of life---From Moses on up until this very day. The Israelite religion, Teach, serve and worship a single being God-YHWH-(YHVH(Jehovah)--Taught to EVERY bible writer. Taught to Jesus his first 30 years attending the Israelite places of worship. The God taught by Jesus-John 20:17, Rev 3:12, John 17:3-- Most refuse to believe Jesus and Facts.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
God through Holy spirit preserved the teachings of Jesus. The New world translation has corrected the errors of trinity translation.
You would have to support that with massive evidence. I don't think you can. And as to the translation by the JW's it is far from perfect. One example is their almost anal need to use the word "Jehovah" even where there is no valid excuse for that name. Second some verses are clearly misinterpreted to go along with their personal beliefs. One example is given here:

Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The fault is. Most refuse to believe Jesus.



I came up with Facts of life---From Moses on up until this very day. The Israelite religion, Teach, serve and worship a single being God-YHWH-(YHVH(Jehovah)--Taught to EVERY bible writer. Taught to Jesus his first 30 years attending the Israelite places of worship. The God taught by Jesus-John 20:17, Rev 3:12, John 17:3-- Most refuse to believe Jesus and Facts.
You shoot your own argument down with the Moses claim.

You need to be able to present an argument not refuted by reality.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
He wouldn't contradict the rest of Gods truth. The little flock( Luke 12:32) = 144,000 of Rev 14:3
Luke and Revelation are two different things. Jesus wasn’t talking to the fictitious 144,000. And yes, the Bible does contradict itself.
 

kjw47

Well-Known Member
You would have to support that with massive evidence. I don't think you can. And as to the translation by the JW's it is far from perfect. One example is their almost anal need to use the word "Jehovah" even where there is no valid excuse for that name. Second some verses are clearly misinterpreted to go along with their personal beliefs. One example is given here:

Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible? | GotQuestions.org


opinion of a man== The Facts of Israelite God worship history and The teachings of Jesus say that man is the one in error. One cannot get any better backing than the teachings of Jesus. His teachings prove 100% no trinity god exists. If you knew what he actually taught( in every translation on earth those teachings are the same) you would know his teachings back the JW teachers. But instead you rely on mans words like the ones you posted. Those men do not know what Jesus actually teaches--Not a single trinitarian religion teaches these teachings correctly.
 
Last edited:
Top