Your example is too extreme to properly apply to the entire thing. We can if we use statistics and see how one would get an abortion in the first place. I didn't say it never can occur I said that the only people who would abort for convenience probably shouldn't have kids anyway. So meh.
My feelings are irrelevant. I'm not getting an abortion right now. This is a debate for or against the right of abortion. Not whether or not I consider life or souls to be imbued in fetuses.
But for the record. Sure I do. But I'm not going to use that as justification for stopping another woman (or God forbid a child) from getting an abortion.
Maybe you are right, ma'am. I'm always bad at giving examples and all this deviated from the main point I was trying to discuss so I probably blew it up as it is not what I prepared for. My examples, according to you, seem to be really rude and useless in this discussion. I deeply apologize for that and please know that by all means I'm not trying to belittle women. If this is a debate for or against abortion, then I think my first ever implication in this thread which is that I'm not against abortion would be enough.
But even if the woman in the 4th month states she wants an abortion, how is that your business. No disrespect Smart Guy but it really is up to the woman. I have seen too many children damaged beyond repair by women who did not abort and then the child became a sociopath. It is better to not abort and then have a child who is a budding Jeffry Dauhmer or is it better that she does have that abortion? Personally, having seen the child who is a sociopath, I think it would be better to have aborted.
I never really claimed it is my business in this thread. I'm trying to find out if this is murder, asking questions whither the growing being in the womb is alive or not. I don't know why members here keep taking my questions as statement instead of just answering them at least first. If you're saying it is up to the women to kill a living being (in the next quote you said it is alive) and that being has no rights and can be completely disregarded, then I take it with respect and apologize that I can't comment on it.
My opinion...yes, that being is alive however, it is NOT a human being. It is a symbiotic creature entirely dependent on the woman for life. Without the host, it would die.
I understand. It really makes me feel sad to know that it can easily be looked at as "not a human being", but it is your opinion and I humbly respect the right of having an opinion.
Last edited: