It’s fun to trace conjectures about mythology; it often becomes a game of speculations...Mush better than your mythological version.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It’s fun to trace conjectures about mythology; it often becomes a game of speculations...Mush better than your mythological version.
Well the future at present is largely unknown, If humanity does not face up to the potential problems and remain blindly attached to ancient tribal agendas will have a tough road in the future.Have you expressed your viewpoint as to what you consider the future to be?
Nothing about ancient tribal things as mankind continues to pollute the earth.Well the future at present is largely unknown, If humanity does not face up to the potential problems and remain blindly attached to ancient tribal agendas will have a tough road in the future.
I don't have an anti science agenda. You do because you make a mockery of science by your evasionThis reference is embarrassing from the perspective of your anti-science agenda, because the whole article describes how the knowledge of science advances correcting previous errors and knowledge based on limited information.
Whare your agenda remains in the Stone Age over run by the many errors you refuse to correct.
I beg to disagree. The future of mankind without my version is that the three Abrahamic religions will fight with each other because they see their theologies to be irreconcilable. On the other hand, my version is that the basic understanding of the Bible and Quran and Hinduism is identical and, in this version, mankind can understand the other version without dislodging from one's own views. So, the better future will be when different religious people believe in their own religions, but also see it to be concordant with the other religions.Mush better than your mythological version.
Not ony that, but @Twilight Hue deliberately refused to answer my question -- and did it while pretending he was. This is, of course, not honest. Expected, but not honest.This reference is embarrassing from the perspective of your anti-science agenda, because the whole article describes how the knowledge of science advances correcting previous errors and knowledge based on limited information.
Whare your agenda remains in the Stone Age over run by the many errors you refuse to correct.
I could quite easily agree with you about this, if (and only if) that meant treating religious scripture as metaphorical only, and not historical -- and certainly not scientific.I beg to disagree. The future of mankind without my version is that the three Abrahamic religions will fight with each other because they see their theologies to be irreconcilable. On the other hand, my version is that the basic understanding of the Bible and Quran and Hinduism is identical and, in this version, mankind can understand the other version without dislodging from one's own views. So, the better future will be when different religious people believe in their own religions, but also see it to be concordant with the other religions.
Yes the the future of humanity as severe problems as in the past with ancient tribal religions fighting wars with each other on brutal ancient moral standards. including Hinduism, Unfortunately humanity will have to deal with this violence as in the past.I beg to disagree. The future of mankind without my version is that the three Abrahamic religions will fight with each other because they see their theologies to be irreconcilable. On the other hand, my version is that the basic understanding of the Bible and Quran and Hinduism is identical and, in this version, mankind can understand the other version without dislodging from one's own views. So, the better future will be when different religious people believe in their own religions, but also see it to be concordant with the other religions.
You have consistently and stoically have clung to and anti-science agenda based on an ancient tribal agenda. You consistently mock science.I don't have an anti science agenda. You do because you make a mockery of science by your evasion
Nope. It's you who habitually put your fingers in your ears whenever you come across something you don't like.Not ony that, but @Twilight Hue deliberately refused to answer my question -- and did it while pretending he was. This is, of course, not honest. Expected, but not honest.
Did not answer the question.Nope. It's you who habitually put your fingers in your ears whenever you come across something you don't like.
Expected, but certainly typical.
That's your problem. Not mine.Did not answer the question.
Mythical speculations without any considerations of science.It’s fun to trace conjectures about mythology; it often becomes a game of speculations...
Did not answer the question. See post #296!That's your problem. Not mine.
Unfortunately @Bharat Jhunjhunwala considers the Pentateuch literal from the bias of Vedic culture.I could quite easily agree with you about this, if (and only if) that meant treating religious scripture as metaphorical only, and not historical -- and certainly not scientific.
Look, I gave you a list of scientific errors in Post #271, in order to show how science continues to learn and grow from it's own mistakes. In that self-same post, I asked you to "give us some examples of when religious dogma was discovered to be wrong and something good came from it." You did nothing of the kind -- instead, you listed more science mistakes, which was ridiculous since I had already conceded the point that science, being a human construct, does indeed make mistakes.Nope. It's you who habitually put your fingers in your ears whenever you come across something you don't like.
Expected, but certainly typical.
Yes, polluting and trashing the earthare a major major issue in the future, but ancient tribal religions do not offer any solutions without science.Nothing about ancient tribal things as mankind continues to pollute the earth.
Such as..?The Bible is wrong about lots of stuff.
The Pentateuch is based on ancient tribal mythology and created history after 600 BCE in contradiction with academic history, science and archeology. The texts lack any provenance on history and authorship.Such as..?
Let's just start with the Genesis creation, the flood and the Exodus. All wrong.Such as..?