• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Adam & Eve sitting in a tree....

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
The authors lived their lives in such a way that allowed them to experience what it is that they wrote down.
In other words, what is written down are internal processes of mind, body and spirit.
This is why the meaning of this stuff was not written down, you had to be a member of a mystery school to be taught.
Isn't it simpler to believe that Judaism had an oral tradition that existed along-side the written?
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
every soul calls itself "I" in the first person. the soul, or individual/form, is impermanent. the mind is permanent but mutable. every I is known by the name given to them by other self.

its like water in a vessel. it doesn't cease to be water simply because it goes from one vessel into another. For example, when water is taken from a well, or spring, and put in a pitcher, it's still water. when the water is emptied from a pitcher into a cup, it's still water. when the water is emptied from the cup into a human, it's still water. the vessel is impermanent because of the forms it takes, the water remains the same throughout.

when is the soul ever permanent? at birth? at age 2? 10? 21? 45? 58? so again, matter is permanent but the form isn't. matter comes in varying forms at lower/higher masses/densities.

OK, that clears up things a bit, since most people regard the soul as being permanent, and that it is in need of salvation beyond death, as in the 'eternal soul'. What you are doing is equating 'soul' with the temporal state of Identification, that is to say, the character each of us is playing in the current incarnation.

But the problem with most people, is that, in calling themselves 'I', they actually believe 'I' to be something real. I am saying that this 'I' is a fraud, and that only consciousness, without 'I', is real.

So in the example you gave of 'water', the unique and temporal snowflake form would be 'I', while water, representing'soul', or consciousness, is the formless Infinite source.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
OK, that clears up things a bit, since most people regard the soul as being permanent, and that it is in need of salvation beyond death, as in the 'eternal soul'. What you are doing is equating 'soul' with the temporal state of Identification, that is to say, the character each of us is playing in the current incarnation.

But the problem with most people, is that, in calling themselves 'I', they actually believe 'I' to be something real. I am saying that this 'I' is a fraud, and that only consciousness, without 'I', is real.

So in the example you gave of 'water', the unique and temporal snowflake form would be 'I', while water, representing'soul', or consciousness, is the formless Infinite source.

that clarifies things but again at every state of energy, it has a state of matter. the difference is simply the amount of mass/density. as things become refined/sifted they become lighter, or heavier.

the Infinite I is everywhere and doesn't have a definition, or form. the temporal state of identification is an illusory thing, having mutated from one form to another, it is still the same but has mutated.


a spirit can evolve, or involve. one is a progression and the other regression. everything, except the ABSOLUTE, has it counterpart. so one is not possible without the other for definition. a hole, higher state of energy/matter, is defined by a lower state of energy/matter.

the only ABSOLUTE is that there are no absolutes. so agreed, the temporal state of identification, or personality, is a temporal form of the Infinite I. like a facet on a diamond, wave on an ocean, aspect of the ABSOLUTE.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
take your pick.....

Someone had to be first

but yeah....leaning more to the individual

actually it was adam and eve. the thing most people miss is that eve was the mother of all living; which doesn't exclude adam the man.

Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living.

the original race was possibly intersexed. if reincarnation is true, then it would make sense that a spirit can change its form from life time to the next in this density/dimension.

actual studies in reincarnation at the university of virginia have documented such cases


The Science of Reincarnation: UVA psychiatrist Jim Tucker investigates children’s claims of past lives
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
actually it was adam and eve. the thing most people miss is that eve was the mother of all living; which doesn't exclude adam the man.

Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living.

the original race was possibly intersexed. if reincarnation is true, then it would make sense that a spirit can change its form from life time to the next in this density/dimension.

actual studies in reincarnation at the university of virginia have documented such cases


The Science of Reincarnation: UVA psychiatrist Jim Tucker investigates children’s claims of past lives
ok....but...

it will always bowl down in regression......Someone had to be first

picture yourself as THAT guy

yeah....it happened
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
Its simply the separation from the Source of all, call it God, Consciousness, whatever, its our true Self. We have all risen from the Source of Consciousness, as waves on the ocean have risen from the ocean, the rest of the story is more or less about returning back to the Source, or Self realizing that we are One with the Source, I believe all religions have the same message within them.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
and your ego thinks word salad wins the day

Because that is what you think to be the case is an indication that it is your ego that is calling the shots. Only the ego is concerned with who wins and who loses.

Your ego's attachment to your dogma is preventing you from seeing things as they are, which means that you see things as they are as 'word salad', not to mention the fact that what you see as 'word salad', is, quite simply, over your head.

A whole new world iawaits you, but first you need to get out of Plato's Cave where you have been indoctrinated to see those gray cave wall shadows as representing reality, when you really need to get a glimpse of the glorious Sun instead.
 
Top