Desert Snake
Veteran Member
God made Man of dust does not exclude evolution
The Biblical verses state outright that man was made in...a day? That isn't evolution.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
God made Man of dust does not exclude evolution
There is a difference between a ''summary'', and a 'in the context of'; I'm reading it not as a summary, personally.
That is what the Torah is, to you? Why would you even read it?
Generally agree, however, do you think that Jesus would have agreed with the Saduccees?
Jesus is affirming Torah, here, not abolishing it.
The Sabbath is obviously redemptive// Sunday, the Christian Sabbath. That being said it may not be 'necessary'. Adherence is going to vary there, and always has.
Can you tell me why "the Church" shifted the Sabbath to Sunday when the 7th day was always Saturday?
Can you also show me where Christians were ever told to observe a Sabbath?
When the circumcision issue arose in the first century, we see that the Jewish Christians wanted to impose Jewish law on Gentile believers and the discussions were getting heated and causing divisions. The apostles and older men in Jerusalem met to solve this dilemma with prayer for God's direction and attention to the scriptures. There was to be no imposition of Jewish law on Gentiles except in areas where the sanctity of blood and immorality were concerned, so the only things that were incumbent on Gentiles and in fact all Christians, was this....We know of redemptive value from inference, and by de facto value via the 10 Commandments. Do you have, to observe Sabbath? Most likely not, and interestingly, this seems to have always been the case. This doesn't mean that some won't observe the Sabbath, and that it has no value.
The ''seventh day'', according to the Calendar, has nothing to do with day of Rest/Sabbath. //ie it's arbitrary.
When 'our' /Jesus adherents Sabbath was set, it simply became codified/customary.
It was mandatory for Jews to observe the Sabbath from the day the Law was given to Israel just after their release from Egypt. The manna was provided to feed the entire nation for the duration of their 40 year sojourn in the wilderness and they had to collect it fresh every day, otherwise it went rotten. On the sixth day, a double supply was given and it kept fresh for consumption on the Sabbath so that the Israelites did not have to work to collect it. Israel was in no doubt about the day of the Sabbath, and how important it was for Jews to see the importance of it.
Exodus 20:8-11:
“Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 10 but the seventh day is a sabbath of the Lord your God; in it you shall not do any work, you or your son or your daughter, your male or your female servant or your cattle or your sojourner who stays with you. 11 For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day and made it holy."
The 7th day has always been Saturday on the Gregorian calendar. And since Christians were under no obligation to keep Sabbath, why the change to Sunday?
It is clear from the scriptures that literal observance of Sabbath days and years was not a part of first-century Christianity. It was not until 321 C.E. that Constantine decreed Sunday to be a day of rest for all but the farmers.
Why Sunday? In Latin it is "dies Solis", an old title associated with astrology and sun worship, not "Sabbatum" [Sabbath] or "dies Domini" [Lord’s day] so what we have is a complete shift in weakened Christian worship to a day where the Romans honored their own god. This is how a pagan Emperor took Roman sun worship and "fused" it with apostate Christianity.
Actually, God chose the Sabbath, not the Jews. Since he determined what day the manna was supplied in double amount so that the Sabbath rest day could be observed in the wilderness, it was not in question which day the Sabbath fell on. It is the day that corresponds with our Saturday and the manna failed appear on that day for 40 years.Judaism chose 'Saturday' in accordance with the /western Calendar, not Christianity.
There is no reason for Christians to follow that 'example'...it is puzzling why you seem to think they should have. I'm not sure what you mean when you say 'the seventh day was always on Saturday, either...
The years do not conform/ start of/, to this, hence there is no actual purpose/usage to that...
This is arbitrary, as I already noted. Christians are not obligated keep the same Sabbath/day of Rest, as Judaism.
Since the whole Jewish system revolved around their worship, it was organized and orderly. The time for festivals was clearly indicated with all instructions laid out as to what they needed to do and when they needed to do it.
Sabbath years as well as weekly Sabbaths were observed in Israel. I am puzzled that you think a Christian "Sabbath" even belongs in Christian worship.
Deeje , I said, it was probably not obligatory, yet obviously has redemptive value, via Scriptural inference.Christians are not obligated to keep a Sabbath, period.
The move to observe a Sabbath or holy day on Sunday has already been explained. Since "Sol Invictus" ("Unconquered Sun") was worshipped in Rome, sun worship in the RCC is as visible today was it was when Constantine first decreed it.
a day in the life of God is like unto a thousand yearsThe Biblical verses state outright that man was made in...a day? That isn't evolution.
was it not Paul that wrote against the .....'sin law'....?Jesus clearly expects us to CONTINUE to obey the Torah of Moses, lest we be called LEAST in the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:19).
Those who desire eternal life (Lk. 10:25) are expected to obey LAW (Lk. 10:26-28).
John expects us to OBEY law (1 Jn. 5:3).
Paul expects us to OBEY law (1 Cor. 7:19).
Love for God (Dt. 6:4-5) entails obedience to ALL Torah commands (Dt. 6:25).
not at all.....We use an inference. The Genesis text, gives literal 'days'. This is extremely quickly, not vague as to time ''inference''. Some myth creation tales, aren't this explicit. You are basically ignoring the actual inference, for your own theory.
measurement is an everyday practiceYou can't wear a watch without contradicting your own position... you do realize, that, right?
was it not Paul that wrote against the .....'sin law'....?
and was it not Jesus that taught to forgive sin?
was it not Paul that wrote against the .....'sin law'....?
and was it not Jesus that taught to forgive sin?
not entirely.Not entirely sure what (precisely) you have in mind by the term "sin law".
But regarding Paul and sin, this argument is clearly supported by Paul's writings in Biblical Scripture:
1. Paul taught that sin is violation of law (Rom. 3:20;7:7).
2. Paul taught that we should not sin (Rom. 6:1-2,15).
3. Paul taught that we should not violate the law (from 1 and 2).
4. Paul taught that we should obey the law (from 3).
Therefore, Paul taught that Christians (disciples of Jesus Christ) should obey the law (i.e., the Law of Moses).
Most Christians are unaware of this.
Now, you ask: "..was it not Jesus that taught to forgive sin?"
My response: Yes, we should forgive other's sins against us if they repent (Lk. 17:4).
In fact, you can imitate Jesus' example (1 Jn. 2:6; Lk. 6:40) and forgive others (even if they have not repented) when they are simply acting ignorantly (Lk. 23:34).
And, Jesus taught that we should pray to be forgiven of sins (Lk. 11:4).
But then, it follows that Jesus taught that it is bad to sin (that's why we need to pray to be forgiven).
But again, "sin = violation of law".
Therefore, Jesus' opposition to sin entails his opposition to violation of law.
We conclude that Jesus (like Paul) likewise taught that we should obey law (i.e., obey the written Law of Moses).
Do you agree?