Esteban X
Active Member
By observing the phases of the moon.And where did the Babylonians get it?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
By observing the phases of the moon.And where did the Babylonians get it?
The consensus in cosmology is 13.5 billion years old.What is the age of the universe then?
There is evidence in the cosmic microwave background that at one point it was smaller than a particle. The large scale background radiation reflects quantum fluxuations that were made large by rapid expansion.Even if it is expanding, was it just a infinitesimal point in the past or something larger?
Unknown. There many be many big bangs, infinite?What caused the Big Bang?
This is standard information in cosmology.Please prove all assertions.
They are not "laws" of nature, nature works with symmetry, limitations, probabilities, mathematics is effective at describing the behavior of natural processes so we call them laws but they are descriptions of how things work in a mathematical way.Where did the universe come from?
If the explanation is the Bing Bang with or without inflation, what was there before that?
If there was nothing before the Big Bang, then that breaks cause and effect. It also violates every law of conservation too.
If there was something before that, what caused the thing that was before the Big Bang to come into being?
If that thing always existed, that violates the law of increasing entropy.
If that thing has not always existed, what was there before the thing that was prior our universe to come into being?
Please continue this until you get something that has always been.
And then that will violate the law of increasing entropy.
Where did the laws of nature come from?
Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?
Where did all energy come from?
Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?
Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?
Where did the orderly and fine-tuned laws of nature come from?
Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?
Where did all energy come from?
Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?
Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?
One, the laws of nature are indeed laws, even the evolutionists call them that.They are not "laws" of nature, nature works with symmetry, limitations, probabilities, mathematics is effective at describing the behavior of natural processes so we call them laws but they are descriptions of how things work in a mathematical way.
We don't know much about the concept of before the big bang because it's hard to study.
We do know that it doesn't prove Zeus, Brahman or Yahweh, at all.
We do know that Yahweh is a typical Mesopotamian, Near Eastern deity in the first 5 books of the OT and did most of the same things his other deities did. The sea monster story is a direct take from Baal who is an older myth.
Everything about the NT is either Persian or Graeco-Roman, Jesus is the last of the mystery cult saviors.
So we have good explanations of those legends.
Not understanding pre-big bang physics doesn't make Mesopotamian/Greek/Persian myths true, even when blended with a Israelite mythology.
We also understand the Israelite people from archaeology and DNA. Both confirm they are from Canaan, not Egypt and scripture does not describe the Israelite folk religion but rather is an elitist perspective from around 600 BCE.
The knowledge is what I find as the importance rather than dna/lineage.We also understand the Israelite people from archaeology and DNA. Both confirm they are from Canaan, not Egypt and scripture does not describe the Israelite folk religion but rather is an elitist perspective from around 600 BCE.
You do not even know what laws of nature are. They are not evidence for a God. If you understood them you could see that.One, the laws of nature are indeed laws, even the evolutionists call them that.
Of course all those nobodies are nobody, except Yahweh the God of the Bible.
And of course, the Bible is the actual true record.
OK... the law (commandment) of no false witness/accuse..... do you accept that as a rule for your life?One, the laws of nature are indeed laws, even the evolutionists call them that.
Of course all those nobodies are nobody, except Yahweh the God of the Bible.
And of course, the Bible is the actual true record.
Of course,OK... the law (commandment) of no false witness/accuse..... do you accept that as a rule for your life?
It’s not because of hawks that love to make life miserable for people so much so that they turn to terrorists to save them, but the terrorists are just as bad.For starters, the attack on Israel is Biblical prophecy fulfilled with exact timing and details.
Agreed...... for example, falsely accusing is wrong.Of course,
And it is loving to tell the truth even some hate the truth.
Your grandiosity is rivalled only by a recent American president.You have just taken the worst defeat in all of history.
You've proven nothing to anybody, and several have told you just that. They reject what you call proof, which makes your claim of proving incoherent and self-refuting. Proof is that which convinces just as humor is that which makes one laugh. Your claim of proving without changing any minds is equivalent to a comedian thinking he's funny without making anybody laugh.I already have provided several infallible proofs that evolution and billions of years are false, and that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago. One of them used MI, another one used the law of non contradiction.
I also gave a challenge that no one has yet met.
I have gave many questions which show that evolution and billions of years are false.
I showed the circular reasoning which has misled the believers in evolution and billions of years.
I proved that the Bible is the true word of God, and it’s corollary that God created all things is 6 days about 6000 years ago.
This was done by all the predictions of the Bible coming true with exact detail and exact timing, predictEd about 2000 to 3500 years ago, with you keep fulfilling. I also showed that the Bible has advanced scientific knowledge in it that has only been discovered in modern times.
Nobody was convinced by you. But some seem to be laughing a little.I already proved that a very large specific sequence of amino acids is impossible by natural processes.
Here's you implied ignorantium fallacy ("if you can't answer my questions, your beliefs must be wrong and therefore mine correct") combined with some special pleading ("and this only applies to you, not me).What was the first living creature and what features did it have?
What was its code?
What caused the Big Bang and where did the fine tuned and orderly laws of nature come from?
What was the first living thing and the first 10 generations of offspring ?
There's no evidence that free will exists or even can. What we likely have is the illusion of free will. That's anathema to Abrahamists, whose god allegedly punishes people for their choices.God made free will creatures and so all things happened due to that.
Did you mean the god of Abraham? You like proof, right? Science has ruled out the universe being created in six days, that there were ever first humans, or that a global flood occurred. The god said to have done those things doesn't exist.God created people and angels that will live forever with free will and no sin.
Evolution doesn't make living creatures.It is not explained in any book written by men how evolution could even make an living creature.
There is no burden of proof with any other person either unable to evaluate an argument for soundness or unwilling to change his mind in presence of such an argument. Burden of proof is misnomer, as we don't actually have to prove anything, just convincingly demonstrate, but that is reserved for discussions between competent critical thinkers engaging in dialectic - the cooperative effort to resolve differences of fact using a specific method for evaluating evidence. If one doesn't know and respect those rules, then there is no possibility of sound, evidenced argument changing his belief set - the definition of closed-mindedness and typical of those under the sway of a faith-based confirmation bias. Such a person cannot be shown he is wrong when he is, so why bother trying?Defend your theory . You will not because you can not.
STILL waiting for the Bible verses that support this claim.For starters, the attack on Israel is Biblical prophecy fulfilled with exact timing and details.
It’s weird when pagan texts had more accurate information than the Bible. I guess that’s what happens when Yahweh is insulted by intelligence and pagans had Gods and Goddesses of learning.Actually the word of God is what is informative not deceived people.
Yeah, God told me that the Bible is wrong.Shame so many got a different message though.
Yeah I can’t seem to find Hamas in there at all.STILL waiting for the Bible verses that support this claim.
And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. - Luke 21:20Yeah I can’t seem to find Hamas in there at all.
Extremely lacking on both the details and the when...And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. - Luke 21:20
Of course it is.Extremely lacking on both the details and the when...
Far cry from your claim of:
"For starters, the attack on Israel is Biblical prophecy fulfilled with exact timing and details."
So what exactly makes THIS TIME the fulfillment of the prophecy?Of course it is.
The fact that after all these years Israel is a nation again or that the Jews have held both their ethnic and religious identify is also predicted and quote frankly amazing.
Exact timing of the prophecies from the Bible explained.So what exactly makes THIS TIME the fulfillment of the prophecy?
Is it simply because it is obvious all the other times weren't?