• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

another **** page.

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Unless the women or girls on the Facebook page are underrage or were forced to take those photographs, I don't see how they've been victimized. The FestivalSluts page is one where people are asked to contribute their photographs. The majority of photographs that I've seen on the page are women who appear to be POSING for photographs.

On this we agree.

We have the right as Americans to comment and express ourselves. Unless something was being said directly to these women to infringe upon their personal rights or to oppress them in a way that could be demonstrated and proven...I fail to see how they can claim victimization or where there is a "shame" factor involved. And if there is any element of shame, does that not fall on the individual woman? You can't really be shamed unless you are ASHAMED of your actions, can you?

Yes. I find the very definition of ****-shaming to be one where the women who is being targeted is considered as someone with the agency to ask for it, or that she must feel ashamed of her actions. For reference:

Put in the most simple terms, ****-shaming happens when a person “publicly or privately [insults] a woman because she expressed her sexuality in a way that does not conform with patriarchal expectations for women” (Kat, ****-Shaming vs. Rape Jokes). It is enabled by the idea that a woman who carries the stigma of being a **** — ie. an “out-of-control, trampy female” — is “not worth knowing or caring about” (Tanenbaum, p. 240).

Source:FAQ: What is “****-shaming”? | Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog

I felt the blog link above captured the essence of ****-shaming adequately, and where i believe is being accepted here (which I stand against).

How are you defining safe place?

I thought I was clear. Where a woman can have as much respect as a man for expressing sexual behavior and language.

If you are defining safe place as a place free from harassment, physical, emotional and sexual abuse, defamation of character, opression and infringment of personal rights...I agree with you.

If you're defining safe place as a place where women are free from opposing opinions and possibly offensive viewpoints, even hurtful comments from others...I can't agree with you. This is an integral piece of American freedom, regardless as to how ugly freedom of speech may come packaged.

Again, I seek equality. I do not see males being ****-shamed in this manner, so I don't think it's unreasonable to expect women to be treated the same.



I'm sorry, Mystic. No person is entitled to unconditional acceptance and adoration. I think some feminists set their expectations entirely too high.

That isn't what I said, though. Read it again. I stated that women should she treated with as much respect as men.

Unconventional behavior does not have to be acceptable to other people and if it offends or disrespects others, others do not have to reciprocate respect simply BECAUSE she happens to be a woman.

Well, I appreciate unconventional behavior. I guess that's the difference between me and them. I also reserve the right to call them names too. It's only fair, right? Free speech and all. ;)

You're wrong. I'm not validating ****-shaming. I'm simply stating that not every comment made is a misogynist comment and I don't hold sympathy for every woman who is labeled a "****" nor do I view every label a misogynist statement.

Intention, circumstance and context does need to be considered.

What would qualify as ****-shaming then if not this FB site?


Then, you don't feel that these people are entitled to their freedom of speech because you find their opinions disagreeable.

LOL so far from the truth. I'm just calling them out for misogynistic attitudes. How do you feel about the "sl#ts get cut" comment? Hate speech or not?

I don't disagree that the concept of the website is deplorable. However, it takes more than one person to contribute. Are women contributing? YES, they are.

Shared responsibility. But, you'll deny this.

Deny? You give far too much credibility in the argument of bearing responsibility for an attack. You said before you were demeaned....did you bring it on yourself? I don't think so, and I would defend against any notion that you deserved the treatment you received.

No I'm not denying....I just disagree with you. I don't see any shared responsibility either in your argument. It seems the onus is on the women themselves and none on the people making the comments. Perhaps you can clarify how those making the comments are responsible?

How is anyone getting attacked, Heather? How is this any different than comments below a YouTube video or on a vlog? People say deplorable things all of the time about people from all walks of life.

Any illegal activity should be addressed.

Outside that, what are we looking at?

Perpetuating ****-shaming is what I'm looking at. You're free to look at it however you want. I'd like to educate people on what **** shaming looks like and how it's harmful to society and how its harmful to the seeking of equality.

I guess if people want to be free to be misogynistic douchbags, they can. But I am free to call them out on it.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Did the gay men go out of their way be provocative and seek attention?

They acted in an unconventional manner. Did they not?

I'm still trying to see how this isn't another "she asked for it" excuse for inexcusable behavior.

There is a difference between having sought after attention turn out to be disrespectful and demeaning, and intrusive and invasive actions that actually impact people's personal, private lives and their rights and freedoms.

Yes I understand that. I'm in the arts, so I get disparaging comments from time to time for my work and who I am personally. Just as a reminder...I'm no stranger to big bad meanies either. I find this site to be rather different, however.
 

dawny0826

Mother Heathen
Yes. I find the very definition of ****-shaming to be one where the women who is being targeted is considered as someone with the agency to ask for it, or that she must feel ashamed of her actions. For reference:

Source:FAQ: What is “****-shaming”? | Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog

I felt the blog link above captured the essence of ****-shaming adequately, and where i believe is being accepted here (which I stand against).

Heather, I know what ****-shaming is and I'm not a fan of it nor do I self identify as a "**** shamer".

I'm evaluating context. Moving backwards to the links in the original post - the FestivalSluts Facebook page - the overall attitude and environment isn't one of ****-shaming. I'm seeing more approving comments than anything else.

I thought I was clear. Where a woman can have as much respect as a man for expressing sexual behavior and language.

And as a generality Heather, I certainly don't disagree with you.

Again, I seek equality. I do not see males being ****-shamed in this manner, so I don't think it's unreasonable to expect women to be treated the same.

As do I.

Do women not need to be mindful of the stereotypical molds that we're trying to break as we pursue equality? I have to ask this question. When women stand against ****-shaming, how can women justify CONTRIBUTING to the type of website that is FestivalSluts?

Do we not as Feminist women hold THESE women accountable to counterproductivity in pursuits for equality? Is there never accountability?

If we're going to destroy the "****" stereotype - how are WE as women going to accomplish that? We can't FORCE viewpoint.

That isn't what I said, though. Read it again. I stated that women should she treated with as much respect as men.

And what of those situations where women are not respectful? Do we not hold ourselves accountable?

Well, I appreciate unconventional behavior. I guess that's the difference between me and them. I also reserve the right to call them names too. It's only fair, right? Free speech and all. ;)

Well, yeah. :p

What would qualify as ****-shaming then if not this FB site?

Something willful with the INTENT of making her feel shame for her actions, personna, clothing, etc.

LOL so far from the truth. I'm just calling them out for misogynistic attitudes. How do you feel about the "sl#ts get cut" comment? Hate speech or not?

I can't find that comment on the website. I'd like to see it underneath the photo it was attached to. Regardless, my first impression is "stupid and immature", not misogynistic and "hateful".

You have to understand, I live on YouTube and watch makeup tutorials daily. I see far worse daily on makeup and cooking channels.

Deny? You give far too much credibility in the argument of bearing responsibility for an attack. You said before you were demeaned....did you bring it on yourself? I don't think so, and I would defend against any notion that you deserved the treatment you received.

My situation is different. Standing in line at a grocery store, unprovoked and NOT drawing attention to myself to have someone make a snide remark at me for the PURPOSE of being an ******* is different than a woman who goes out of her way to submit a photograph of herself scantily clad to a FestivalSluts Facebook page.

Circumstances are quite different.

I didn't directly contribute or submit to the source of my frustration and upset.

No I'm not denying....I just disagree with you. I don't see any shared responsibility either in your argument. It seems the onus is on the women themselves and none on the people making the comments. Perhaps you can clarify how those making the comments are responsible?

If such a page is going to exist, it can only exist if women pose for photographs, and photos are submitted. Willing participants make this page a reality.

Women are a part of that reality. We don't have the right to not be offended. Genuine abuse and unlawful acts are a different animal over offensive comments.

Herein lies the problem with the perpetuation of ****-shaming. Feministic movements cannot control that the term "****" will continue to be deemed negative within parts of our culture. There's nothing that women can do to change that. We can blame men for being misogynists for calling us sluts, but, what happens when we label ourselves "****"? How does that impact our efforts towards equality? And what messages does this give society, when we, as women, represent and live the stereotypes that we resent men and others for imposing upon us?

Education is important. Misogyny is a beast that we all need to fight together. But, I do believe as a feminist that women need to acknowledge that there are women who wear stereotypes like costumes and it hurts forward progress.

I'm not insinuating in any way a restriction of expression for the fear of what others might say about us. To the contrary. We can't be sluts unless we self identify and project as sluts. Part of "**** shaming" lies in how women view themselves and project their own individuality and sexuality and I won't give men or other women for that matter but so much credit for good reason. Women themselves helped to create this "****". Women need to bring this "****" down, if she's an oppressive force to our forward progress.
 
Last edited:

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
So, I have to ask this question. When women stand against ****-shaming, how can women justify CONTRIBUTING to the type of website that is FestivalSluts?

Do we not as Feminist women hold THESE women accountable to counterproductivity in pursuits for equality? Is there never accountability?

If we're going to destroy the "****" stereotype - how are WE as women going to accomplish that?

Exactly. It makes no sense to me that women would reinforce negative stereotypes, reward demeaning attitudes, and then complain about it afterwards.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
LOL so far from the truth. I'm just calling them out for misogynistic attitudes. How do you feel about the "sl#ts get cut" comment? Hate speech or not?

Wasn't that shirt pointed out to be photoshopped earlier in the thread? Even if it wasn't, wasn't it a woman who was wearing it? Also, as far as "hate speech" is concerned: is "****" something that people identity as? Is it a defining quality?
 

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
o you know what, women should be standing up for men who are being abused. Just like men need to stand up for women who are being abused. if both don't stand up for each other, then there is a problem.

Why do women "specifically" need to stand up for men who are abused?Is there some sort of systematic abuse perpetrated against males by females?That is the only reason I can think of females "specifically' should stand up against men who are abused.Show me an area where men are specifically targeted because they are males by women and I will make that distinction.Until then I am against all abuse.And I will specifically talk about abuses against women where they are singled out or the majority victims because they are female.
 

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
Yes. I find the very definition of ****-shaming to be one where the women who is being targeted is considered as someone with the agency to ask for it, or that she must feel ashamed of her actions.

Exactly..a target based on GENDER...
 

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
I don't understand why the feminist only area has been turned into a debate area about men flashing genitals ???And what women are doing about male's being abused?
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
I don't understand why the feminist only area has been turned into a debate area about men flashing genitals ???And what women are doing about male's being abused?

If you were reading along, it was about drawing parallels and equivalencies. We're delving into a complex issue rather than placating emotion.
 

fallingblood

Agnostic Theist
Why do women "specifically" need to stand up for men who are abused?Is there some sort of systematic abuse perpetrated against males by females?That is the only reason I can think of females "specifically' should stand up against men who are abused.Show me an area where men are specifically targeted because they are males by women and I will make that distinction.Until then I am against all abuse.And I will specifically talk about abuses against women where they are singled out or the majority victims because they are female.
The same reason men "specifically" need to stand up for women who are abused. The same reason why men "specifically" need to stand up for men who are abused. The same reason why women "specifically" need to stand up for women who are abused. Or to put it simply, the same reason why humans need to stand up for other humans who are being abused. It doesn't need to be a male vs female idea here.

As for the idea of systematic abuse, why must it be that? Should all abuse be stood against? I think so. And it isn't just male on female, or female on male violence. It is also male on male and female on female violence. All that needs to be considered and fought against. The whole us vs them dichotomy simply is one that leads to failure.

Now, if you say you are against all abuse, you shouldn't help justify it by belittling the abuse felt by another group. That is what you have been doing, and it isn't right. We need to stand all together.

I don't understand why the feminist only area has been turned into a debate area about men flashing genitals ???And what women are doing about male's being abused?
Because feminists have differing points of view. And the discussion didn't turn to what women are doing about male's being abused. My point has only been that one shouldn't belittle the abuse of men with the ideology that women have it worse. That only helps justify abuse, and allows it to continue.
 

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
Because feminists have differing points of view. And the discussion didn't turn to what women are doing about male's being abused. My point has only been that one shouldn't belittle the abuse of men with the ideology that women have it worse. That only helps justify abuse, and allows it to continue.

Yes it did..If you say ...women are raped by men ..saying "women rape men too" is a deflection off the problem.Its not "belittling" to say that's included but not the issue here.

OH no your RIGHT its completely equal ..mothers should teach their sons AND daughters equally..(women need to teach boys and girls) to watch out ..that's why I taught all 3 of my boys black belt karate chop..to be able to defend themselves against women rapist...I also every year give them a fresh can of mace to carry on their key chains ..and I warn them about wearing tight pants and no shirt because lots of women out there might think he's asking to get raped..

Its all the same..male or female.
 

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
I've also (to be equal) taught my sons to be 'equal' they should EXPECT to be called filthy disgusting STD ridden scum that stinks like a dirty toilet bowl if they take their shirt off.Hey ...that's what they asked for...
 

fallingblood

Agnostic Theist
Those belittling remarks, and the negative sarcasm don't help matters. I honestly don't think you are getting what I am saying. Basically you are sending a message that men don't matter as much because it doesn't happen to them. Which is exactly why men continue to be abused and have no recourse as people don't believe it.

What you are doing is justifying abuse by making sarcastic remarks. It is t acceptable. To belittle any abuse only allows that abuse to continue.
 

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
Those belittling remarks, and the negative sarcasm don't help matters. I honestly don't think you are getting what I am saying. Basically you are sending a message that men don't matter as much because it doesn't happen to them. Which is exactly why men continue to be abused and have no recourse as people don't believe it.

What you are doing is justifying abuse by making sarcastic remarks. It is t acceptable. To belittle any abuse only allows that abuse to continue.

Whatever.'I''m in reality.I have sons.:)
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
That over-simplifies and glosses over intent. There is a difference between simply being gay and public displays of provocation. With the latter one deliberately courting with controversy.

I disagree. Any unconventional behavior courts controversy, but I don't think such behavior warrants the kind of response displayed on this FB site. A gay man who in an oppressive and homophobic country is courting with controversy if he attempts to seek out a relationship with another man. You're focusing on public display of behavior of the women as a qualifier for the free speech of the FB site, and I'm focusing on the speech of the FB site as being disparaging against women who are pulling up their tops to reveal some pasties.

As said before, I find it odd that such speech is defended on FB, but pictures of breastfeeding are taken down and viewed as pornographic and unsuitable for FB. What's your take on that?
 

dawny0826

Mother Heathen
I disagree. Any unconventional behavior courts controversy, but I don't think such behavior warrants the kind of response displayed on this FB site. A gay man who in an oppressive and homophobic country is courting with controversy if he attempts to seek out a relationship with another man. You're focusing on public display of behavior of the women as a qualifier for the free speech of the FB site, and I'm focusing on the speech of the FB site as being disparaging against women who are pulling up their tops to reveal some pasties.

As said before, I find it odd that such speech is defended on FB, but pictures of breastfeeding are taken down and viewed as pornographic and unsuitable for FB. What's your take on that?

I know you've addressed FH. Feel free to ignore me. :) I don't understand what response you're referencing as it relates to this FB site?

Some women have submitted their own photographs and have commented on their own photos...self-identifying as "sluts".

I guess what I'm having a hard time understanding is how, in context, you're perceiving disparaging action against women, in this particular, context.

The only action, in my opinion, which could be perceived as disparaging in the context of such a website, considering its intent and the "criteria" for existence would be if a photograph was unlawfully/unfairly used or if someone underrage is featured.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Heather, I know what ****-shaming is and I'm not a fan of it nor do I self identify as a "**** shamer".

I'm evaluating context. Moving backwards to the links in the original post - the FestivalSluts Facebook page - the overall attitude and environment isn't one of ****-shaming. I'm seeing more approving comments than anything else.

Can you give an example of what you find to be approving comments?

And as a generality Heather, I certainly don't disagree with you.

As do I.

WOO-HOO! :D

Do women not need to be mindful of the stereotypical molds that we're trying to break as we pursue equality? I have to ask this question. When women stand against ****-shaming, how can women justify CONTRIBUTING to the type of website that is FestivalSluts?

Do we not as Feminist women hold THESE women accountable to counterproductivity in pursuits for equality? Is there never accountability?

If we're going to destroy the "****" stereotype - how are WE as women going to accomplish that? We can't FORCE viewpoint.

No, but we can challenge viewpoints. We can question them, rally against them, and speak out against viewpoints.

Well, destroying the **** stereotype doesn't mean to tell women they're acting like sluts because they took their clothes off. Destroying the stereotype IMO requires society to place the agency and responsibility back on the people who are reacting to women who are taking their clothes off. It's a common tactic to scapegoat women when they are the target of attacks, of disrespect, and of ****-shaming.

I draw a parallel to how stay-at-home moms back in the 1970s were told they were holding feminism back by choosing to stay at home for their kids and not finding their independence. It's a stereotype that stay-at-home moms are infantilized backward-thinking women who aren't doing their part in fighting for equality. That's a position I do not agree with. Women should be free to choose their position in their marriages and how they contribute or save in the economy.

My parallel is that it isn't that we should be telling women they shouldn't be acting like sluts, that they shouldn't be stripping naked while asking for respect, that they deserve all the negative attention they get....I identify as a sex-positive feminist, and so my position is that women who celebrate their sexuality as their own choice ideally should not be disparaged for it. It's an ideal I'm striving toward, not to decide how a woman "should" act in order to garner respect for being a woman.

We've tried that tactic for a long time. I prefer to look at where and why sexual displays by both men and women are treated unequally, and if there is no rationality behind the difference, I challenge it.

And what of those situations where women are not respectful? Do we not hold ourselves accountable?

If a woman is flipping her top up, I don't find that disrespectful. But if a woman is attacking others, and SHE is making disparaging comments about other people, I find that to be worthy of a sharp retort. Not when she's just living her life.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Something willful with the INTENT of making her feel shame for her actions, personna, clothing, etc.

I can't find that comment on the website. I'd like to see it underneath the photo it was attached to. Regardless, my first impression is "stupid and immature", not misogynistic and "hateful".

It was photoshopped onto the t-shirt in one of the pictures. I stated that the comments below found nothing wrong with it. I disagree that such a comment is not hateful, but that it's supportive of violence against "sluts."

You have to understand, I live on YouTube and watch makeup tutorials daily. I see far worse daily on makeup and cooking channels. People are stupid.

And like I said to FH, you have to understand that I live for the stage, and I have been the target of reviews in our local media. People are people. Misogyny is misogyny.

My situation is different. Standing in line at a grocery store, unprovoked and NOT drawing attention to myself to have someone make a snide remark at me for the PURPOSE of being an ******* is different than a woman who goes out of her way to submit a photograph of herself scantily clad to a FestivalSluts Facebook page.

Circumstances are quite different.

I didn't directly contribute or submit to the source of my frustration and upset.

Isn't it always different when it becomes a personal story? :p

Well first, there's a debate earlier in the thread that questioned whether or not the women in the photographs willingly submitted their photos. You're under the assumption that they all did, and that assumption has been put under scrutiny.

Second, some would say (I wouldn't say this) that you appearing in public by itself appearance alone is inviting comments. There's a whole thread on fat-shaming that addresses the phenomena in our culture, and that the people who justify their behavior does place the onus on men and women like you who they see as not taking responsibility for your behavior. There are people who would suggest if you let yourself go like that, then what do you expect when you walk out in public?

It's a pretty sad position to take, IMO, by saying that you deserve your treatment, when you yourself say that you did nothing to invite such comments. I'm across the board with the live and let live mentality, and challenging others who think they're justified with NOT letting others live and just live.

I'm consistently saying that you are living your life, that you ought to be free from disparaging comments and harassment just because you're living your life and enjoying who you are. I find the same defense ought to be applied to women who flip their tops up for a camera. Both of you are in public. I'm on stage. So all of us are living freely with our choices. That is what I defend.

If such a page is going to exist, it can only exist if women pose for photographs, and photos are submitted. Willing participants make this page a reality.

Women are a part of that reality. We don't have the right to not be offended. Genuine abuse and unlawful acts are a different animal over offensive comments.

I'm sure people felt justified in screaming at the suffragettes, at women who entered the work force and attained positions of power, at women who convinced their religious organizations to begin ordaining women, and women who got on the pill for the purpose of preventing a pregnancy. Women who walk around with condoms in their purses. Women who decided to wear bikinis. Women who decided to march for the E.R.A.

I'm not focusing on the feelings of women, but the perpetuation of the attitude that women deserve the disparaging comments by bringing it on themselves. I'm not telling people that they should never be allowed to speak against feminism, but instead I'm challenging the motivation as to what aspects of feminism they feel so justified in offering. And when it comes to women taking their tops off or breastfeeding in class in front of students, I'm not telling people to never speak their minds, but I'm challenging what is motivating the hostile reactions to women who are living their lives as freely as they believe men do.

Herein lies the problem with the perpetuation of ****-shaming. Feministic movements cannot control that the term "****" will continue to be deemed negative within parts of our culture. There's nothing that women can do to change that.

Stop right there....why do you think there is nothing women can do? Where is the acceptance of the status quo coming from?

We can blame men for being misogynists for calling us sluts, but, what happens when we label ourselves "****"? How does that impact our efforts towards equality? And what messages does this give society, when we, as women, represent and live the stereotypes that we resent men and others for imposing upon us?

I go past resentment. I speak up and tell men and other women who practice ****-shaming against others that they're speaking from a position of intolerance. I don't sit back and whine about being helpless. I challenge their positions. I back it up with parallels to other issues of equality - whether it's women, blacks, queers, indigenous people, etc.

Also, as I'd stated before, I wear the term "whore" like a badge of honor rather than to let such a term carry its power over me. But I also challenge people perceptions of what "whore" means to them, and what they believe society should expect from "whores". Freedom? Social exile? Or targets of assault?

Education is important. Misogyny is a beast that we all need to fight together. But, I do believe as a feminist that women need to acknowledge that there are women who wear stereotypes like costumes and it hurts forward progress.

Like the power-hungry ***** CEO. The backward-thinking submissive wife. The virginal girl-next-door. The man-hating dyke who never shaves and wears a butch haircut. There are plenty of stereotypes that exist in feminism and that exist as cultural targets of harassment. Instead of telling women that they're only hurting progress of feminism just because they actually dress or act the stereotype that hurts us, why not fight for their freedom to choose and to change their minds whenever they wish?

I'm not insinuating in any way a restriction of expression for the fear of what others might say about us. To the contrary. We can't be sluts unless we self identify and project as sluts. Part of "**** shaming" lies in how women view themselves and project their own individuality and sexuality and I won't give men or other women for that matter but so much credit for good reason. Women themselves helped to create this "****". Women need to bring this "****" down, if she's an oppressive force to our forward progress.

I agree that women are the biggest contributor to ****-shaming. But where we part ways is the distinction of responsibility. I don't think "sluts" are responsible, but those who target women who they think act like "sluts."

I'd described before that I head to a local dairy Mennonite farm to pick up local dairy. But I head directly from the dance studio to pick up our milk. I am in a major rush every trip, because I go from the studio ALL the way out in the middle of nowhere to pick it up, so my change to wear something "appropriate" in the eyes of the Mennonite farmers is not a choice I'm willing to make. I go in my dance clothes, which is typically a camisole tank top and yoga pants. The farmers conduct business, but the reactions they give when they see me dressed the way that I do is one of alarm.

If they were to make disparaging comments about the manner of dress (which I assume is one where I'm dressed like a "whore" for showing too much skin and displaying too much of my figure), I wouldn't find it warranted. They may be free to speak, but I'm free to tell them they're speaking from a position of intolerance. I'm a dancer and a choreographer and a business owner, so I'm busy, and I'm just living my life. Think what you want about me, but let's just keep it simple and realize I'm buying your dairy products.

I also had the studio located for a year in a building owned and operated by a very outspoken Christian who had a fitness studio that is Christian-focused. They didn't proselytize, but they certainly created a lot of attention when they would go into a Tim Tebow position to pray before each group workout. It's unconventional, but undeserving of ridicule. I've defended THEIR actions as well and have told some of my friends to back off.

On that note...I need to get to the studio. Got a full day on Saturday with classes and rehearsals. If it's any worth, Dawny, I've enjoyed this conversation with you so far. I respect people who hold radically different positions than me and who challenge me on my positions. Especially when the same people are open to my challenges to their positions. I look forward to more conversations between us in the future (hopefully later on).
 
Top