Unless the women or girls on the Facebook page are underrage or were forced to take those photographs, I don't see how they've been victimized. The FestivalSluts page is one where people are asked to contribute their photographs. The majority of photographs that I've seen on the page are women who appear to be POSING for photographs.
On this we agree.
We have the right as Americans to comment and express ourselves. Unless something was being said directly to these women to infringe upon their personal rights or to oppress them in a way that could be demonstrated and proven...I fail to see how they can claim victimization or where there is a "shame" factor involved. And if there is any element of shame, does that not fall on the individual woman? You can't really be shamed unless you are ASHAMED of your actions, can you?
Yes. I find the very definition of ****-shaming to be one where the women who is being targeted is considered as someone with the agency to ask for it, or that she must feel ashamed of her actions. For reference:
Put in the most simple terms, ****-shaming happens when a person publicly or privately [insults] a woman because she expressed her sexuality in a way that does not conform with patriarchal expectations for women (Kat, ****-Shaming vs. Rape Jokes). It is enabled by the idea that a woman who carries the stigma of being a **** ie. an out-of-control, trampy female is not worth knowing or caring about (Tanenbaum, p. 240).
Source:FAQ: What is ****-shaming? | Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog
I felt the blog link above captured the essence of ****-shaming adequately, and where i believe is being accepted here (which I stand against).
How are you defining safe place?
I thought I was clear. Where a woman can have as much respect as a man for expressing sexual behavior and language.
If you are defining safe place as a place free from harassment, physical, emotional and sexual abuse, defamation of character, opression and infringment of personal rights...I agree with you.
If you're defining safe place as a place where women are free from opposing opinions and possibly offensive viewpoints, even hurtful comments from others...I can't agree with you. This is an integral piece of American freedom, regardless as to how ugly freedom of speech may come packaged.
Again, I seek equality. I do not see males being ****-shamed in this manner, so I don't think it's unreasonable to expect women to be treated the same.
I'm sorry, Mystic. No person is entitled to unconditional acceptance and adoration. I think some feminists set their expectations entirely too high.
That isn't what I said, though. Read it again. I stated that women should she treated with as much respect as men.
Unconventional behavior does not have to be acceptable to other people and if it offends or disrespects others, others do not have to reciprocate respect simply BECAUSE she happens to be a woman.
Well, I appreciate unconventional behavior. I guess that's the difference between me and them. I also reserve the right to call them names too. It's only fair, right? Free speech and all.
You're wrong. I'm not validating ****-shaming. I'm simply stating that not every comment made is a misogynist comment and I don't hold sympathy for every woman who is labeled a "****" nor do I view every label a misogynist statement.
Intention, circumstance and context does need to be considered.
What would qualify as ****-shaming then if not this FB site?
Then, you don't feel that these people are entitled to their freedom of speech because you find their opinions disagreeable.
LOL so far from the truth. I'm just calling them out for misogynistic attitudes. How do you feel about the "sl#ts get cut" comment? Hate speech or not?
I don't disagree that the concept of the website is deplorable. However, it takes more than one person to contribute. Are women contributing? YES, they are.
Shared responsibility. But, you'll deny this.
Deny? You give far too much credibility in the argument of bearing responsibility for an attack. You said before you were demeaned....did you bring it on yourself? I don't think so, and I would defend against any notion that you deserved the treatment you received.
No I'm not denying....I just disagree with you. I don't see any shared responsibility either in your argument. It seems the onus is on the women themselves and none on the people making the comments. Perhaps you can clarify how those making the comments are responsible?
How is anyone getting attacked, Heather? How is this any different than comments below a YouTube video or on a vlog? People say deplorable things all of the time about people from all walks of life.
Any illegal activity should be addressed.
Outside that, what are we looking at?
Perpetuating ****-shaming is what I'm looking at. You're free to look at it however you want. I'd like to educate people on what **** shaming looks like and how it's harmful to society and how its harmful to the seeking of equality.
I guess if people want to be free to be misogynistic douchbags, they can. But I am free to call them out on it.