Curious George
Veteran Member
Correct.So nothing about gun control laws at all?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Correct.So nothing about gun control laws at all?
No, this is not an agreement. There is no right. Just your head in the sand over tye reality of guns.Rightttttt....
Nothing escapes you Shadow. Keep chugging down that single track.No, this is not an agreement. There is no right. Just your head in the sand over tye reality of guns.
Nope. Just using the same stupid logic used for guns.
Trans people are killing now, so it must be the Trans treatments, so requiring licensing and background checks are the solution to stop trans people from killing.
Stupid logic dosent work does it?
Nope.You'd place faith in thugs in blue who handcuff children,
or hide outside while a perp is inside the school still shooting?
Oh.Your "lunch lady" could be vetted & trained to defend the school
& occupants. She already works there for pay, she's already on site
if there's trouble, she's not trained to see all civilians as a threat,
she's not inculcated to believe she's better than civilians, she's
emotionally connected to the students, & she isn't trained to
have an itchy trigger finger.
Nope.BTW, have something against either ladies or cafeteria workers?
I'm just looking at the unpredictable effects of acquiring hormone therapy. Dangerous as a gun. Drives people homicidal-y wild!To be fair, this is a false equivalency. One is a weapon and one is a person. A true comparison would be a weapon with a weapon - like comparing how much destruction could be done between a kitchen knife and an assault rifle
If you wanted to bring trans people into it, we could compare mass shootings between trans and non trans people
I'm just looking at the unpredictable effects of acquiring hormone therapy. Dangerous as a gun. Drives people wild!
Understand it's soley tongue in cheek to creatively demonstrate how regulation isn't an answer to a problem.
I don’t know that I would oppose or support such laws and regulations. I think that individual regulation on firearms need to be reviewed and scrutinized.He did say it was "just the start".
I'll add secure storage laws, red flag laws, & improve
regulation of how one grants others access to one's guns..
Most will get it. Some won't.Eh... maybe, but using false equivalencies will make people dismiss your points since they will just take it as a weak argument, even if it is done satirically
Maybe, just maybe if the relevant parts of America changed their attitude to difference and accepted it rather than marginalising it this wouldn't be such a problem
Perhaps that would be a reasonable compromise. Allow only muskets, blunderbusses, flintlock pistols, etc. from that era. 2A would remain intact.Colonial days the best you can get is a muzzle loader. You really can't go on a shooting spree with something that requires a lengthy reload after one shot.
There's no maybe to it. He's being an inflammatory jerk.Eh... maybe, but using false equivalencies will make people dismiss your points since they will just take it as a weak argument, even if it is done satirically
You are the one using a dumb argument and trying to pretend it has a shred of merit despite the fact guns are the number one killer of children in America and trans people rarely are violent.Nothing escapes you Shadow. Keep chugging down that single track.
Remember that time honored adage?You are the one using a dumb argument and trying to pretend it has a shred of merit despite the fact guns are the number one killer of children in America and trans people rarely are violent.
It's just as dumb as everyone wanting to blame mental illness and use that as a scapgoat for gun violence.
When I talk about mental health, I am using an umbrella term for things that would include PTSD AND CPTSD, poor coping skills, deficits in interpersonal functioning, deficits in emotional regulation, impulsivity, addiction, neuroticism, and high emotional reactivity. None of these things are in and of themselves to blame or determinants of violence, but they are things that can be addressed to reduce violence overall and improve the lives of even those who struggle with these issues and will never act out aggressively towards self or others.It's just as dumb as everyone wanting to blame mental illness and use that as a scapgoat for gun violence.
My proposals don't rely on "good guys with guns".So ALERRT did a study on mass or attempted mass shootings from 2000 to 2021 and how they ended and this is what they found
Of 433 mass shooting scenerios, 22 were stopped by good guys with guns. This doesn't seem to be a reliable way to stop a growing problem, imo...
ANALYSIS: Who Stops a ‘Bad Guy With a Gun’?
The lengthy police response to a school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, and the death of an armed security guard as part of an attack on a Buffalo su...www.allsides.com
Remember that time honored adage?
"Guns don't kill people. People kill people".
If it ain't a gun, it will be something else.
My proposals don't rely on "good guys with guns".
Is the source of murderous intent ease of access to guns?Why are we continuing to go after the symptom instead of trying to treat the actual source of the problem?