Gharib
I want Khilafah back
So ProudMuslim called you a nonmuslim then, did he?
what? can you please tell me whats going on.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So ProudMuslim called you a nonmuslim then, did he?
You mean Abdul Rahman?eselam said:ok so whats the story with this guy, what has happened? could you do a breif summary?
Yet you didn't show me the "posts" that supported your claims. If anything you realized you were wrong so to save your face you said this:
You see Ymir I never defended the action of Muslims did i? You keep going in circle.
There is no story here, i was stating MY opinion which is derived from Islam, from Qur'anic verses. You might say other Muslims also say their opinion derive from Islam so which one to believe, right? Read the Qur'an Ymir. I know you are an athiest but read the Qur'an and decide for yourself if you are really interested in knowing the answer.
The issue here is not how some Muslims twist the definition of treason, the issue here is if killing of an apostate is Islamic or not? If Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) killed apostate? if the war with the apostates after the death of the Prophet (PBUH) was justified?
Well how does pen and words equate physical force? In Qur'an it states clearly when war is justified, and that when we are met with physical force.
And you just wasted your time summoning useless information. How is that relevant to my point?
Is the topic here how many Muslims agree with me or what is the Islamic teaching? It is not down to opinions, it is down to what is written in Qur'an. I challenge anyone to find me one verse that support the killing of an apostate.
9:73-74 O Prophet, strive [j-h-d] hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be adamant and stern with them . . . they did utter the words of unbelief. Thus, they were guilty of unbelief after they professed Islam . . . If even now they repent of their misbehavior, it will be good for their own selves, but if they do not repent, Allah will chastise them with a painful chastisement in this world and the Hereafter . . . . (Maududi, vol. 2, p. 213)
You are missing the point here, when you have strong faith in something you will not find anything else difficult. Ahmed Dedat example was to show that Muslims are not afraid to debate publicly their faiths with other profound religious figures.
Disinformation? Yup the usual replies again Mr. Ridgeon opinion on Mr. Dedat is of no value to me. Let facts talk and the fact is Mr. Dedat was a subject expert matter and managed convery Islamic message to people of other faiths. This cannot be said about many others including Muslim scholars. He was one of a kind.
Majority? Have you met the majority of Muslims? Now if you have said "saldy it is not a view expressed by many Muslims" i would've agreed but inserting "majority" make your post irrationale.
This is not my try, it is YOURS. You tried to twist this into Islam being the government and if they rejected Islam it means they betrayed the government. That was your logic. Well i just showed you the flaw in your logic because non-Muslim is a non-Muslim in other words ALL non-Muslims reject the "government". Beside, and i know you will keep dodging this fact, if we are supposed to kill apostate why isn't written in Qur'an, pure and simple?
I dont take lectures on Sharia Law from a non-Muslim, let alone an athiest. You and other athiests in the forum need to understand and grasp this information.
I have answered that question over and over, but it seems you find it hard to understand or maybe you just want me to join the anti-Islam propoganda and repeat the "behead the apostates is compliant with Sharia Law"!
Maybe if you answer the following question you will be able to understand the different between an apostate and a traitor. So hww do you know one is a terrorist or simply an extremist? and who decides?
Tell him everything you want and know about it, gnostic, but he himself has stated he wont open his mind to you. In his own words:
Whoops, my sincerest apologies. Were not a bad bunch to be a part of . Nonetheless, Ill duly note peoples claimed genders next before assigning them with a sex!Yes but it must say "in her own words....", i am a she not a he.
What about this,is it a good translation?
I have highlighted this sentence: Allah will punish them with a grievous penalty in this life and in the Hereafter: They shall have none on earth to protect or help them.
Here it states punishment in this life and the next
Whoops, my sincerest apologies. Were not a bad bunch to be a part of . Nonetheless, Ill duly note peoples claimed genders next before assigning them with a sex!
Apostasy in Islam - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is this innacurate then?
The four major Sunni Madh'hab (schools of Islamic jurisprudence) and theShi'aJafari madhab agree that a sane adult male apostate must be executed
Wael Hallaq states the death penalty was a new element added later and "reflects a later reality and does not stand in accord with the deeds of the Prophet."[2] Montazeri believes that it is probable that the punishment was prescribed by Muhammad during early Islam - due to political conspiracies against Islam and Muslims, and not only because of changing the belief or expressing it. Montazeri defines different types of apostasy. He does not hold that a reversion of belief because of investigation and research is punishable by death, but prescribes capital punishment for a desertion of Islam out of malice and enmity towards the Muslim community.
Did you read the content of the link you have posted?
It explains the controversy about apostasy in Islam in the eyes of scholars.
If your question was pointed at me personally, then i choose this excerpt from the above link to explain my position:
[/u][/u]
Yes but it says Allāhu Akbar Examples of God's worldly punishhments: disease, natural disaster, famine, displacement, poverty, etc.
That seems to be another bizarre thing that I’ve seen muslims do a lot. They seem to act as though somehow disproving Christianity will magically make Islâm the truth.
You links don't go anywhere, Kai.
I went through a QA phase once. I realise now mostly because it made things easier, and didnt leave me having to explain embarrassing stories of Muhammad in the SAHIH (deemed correct) ahadith collections, like him fondling his wife while she was on her period, having sex with a nineyearold, having companions that stoned a monkey to death for fornication, convincing people to drink camel urine, likening playing chess to dipping your hands in swine blood, etc.Muslim. specifically, Quran-alone. it's an emerging movement within Islam, and it's a sola-scriptura approach to the faith. it has connections ideologically to liberal Islam, progressive Islam, and similar movements.
Quranic Islam encourages Muslims to read and interpret scripture for themselves, and to determine for themselves what is cultural, and what is necessary for faith. for example, no where in the Quran does it say that a Muslim woman should or must cover her hair / wear hijab. so a Quranic Muslim woman may chose (if she is able) to not wear a headscarf if she understands this practice to be cultural and unnecesary rather than religiously mandated, or she may chose to wear the hijab as well.
no where in the Quran does it say that a Muslim woman should or must cover her hair / wear hijab. so a Quranic Muslim woman may chose (if she is able) to not wear a headscarf if she understands this practice to be cultural and unnecesary rather than religiously mandated, or she may chose to wear the hijab as well.
And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband's fathers, their sons, their husbands' sons, their brothers or their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their women, or the slaves whom their right hands possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex; and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments. And O ye Believers! turn ye all together towards God, that ye may attain Bliss.