• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Apostates of Islam

Gharib

I want Khilafah back
Ack! I've just changed it.
You were offline a moment ago, so I thought I'd edit it. :D

then ask again what you want.

Actually, I think it's insulting to Allah to even claim you are following what he says, when ahadith are the word of man, and the Qur'an is the word of God.

and the word of god, clearly states that we must accept the final messenger of god, having said that, god is pleased with the words comming from this man that he tells us to follow. ( i can't find hat verse at the moment, i hate it when i can't find the verses when i need them)

I understand what you are trying to say, that you want to be a good Muslim. But is killing someone for disagreeing with you really being a good follower of Allah?

it is not about dissagreement, it is about protecting people. if an apostate of any religion speaks out, then so many people will get derailed from finding the right path. now imagine if all apostates spoke about their former religion, everyone would become an atheist. so wat about religion?

That's not even a valid excuse for killing someone because of freedom of thought, though.

but then neither is killing someone who hutrs other people a valid excuse. if we go into that, then no one should be harmed.

Deadly virus =/= leaving Islam.

deadly virus = deadly etternal afterlife. i know that deadly virus =/= leaving islam.

I can understand how you see this, but this is an extremely unfair thing. What if X religion believed the same, and killed Xers who became Muslims? Would you consider that acceptable because that's their religion?

yes i would, if one X left his religion and the X religion did nothing about it, then the X religion woul just be a toy for everyone to play with for a while and discard it.

Simple thing: leave it to God to decide. God is the only one in charge, after all. :)

but if god tells us to carry out something then we would be opposing god, if we leave it for him.

I understand what you mean here, but the sentence is explicitly "there is no compulsion in religion". There is no need to delve into "deeper meanings". It's there because it's there. It's simple enough to understand, otherwise it's twisting the word of Allah to fit the evil hearts of men.

first of all what does compulsion mean? i don't think i understand this word very well, i was looking it up before, but never got a clear answer.

If any hadith are against the Qur'an, then they are false. This is what every sheikh has said to me.

yes that is correct

I understand why you say that Muhammad cannot tell lies or sin, but:

  1. how do you know Muhammad said it, and not someone who lied?

what are we speaking about here?

  1. how do you know Muhammad cannot lie?
the prophets of Allah (swt) never sined, so since they never sined we can say that they never lied, a sin is equal to a lie.
  1. where is it that Muhammad cannot lie, and that hadith cannot be fabricated simply because of the chain of transmission
i do not know if there is any verse that says prophets do not sin, so i do not know from where i know that. maybe just logic.

the hadith cannot be fabricated if it does not conradict other hadiths or the quran and the sunnah.

I don't believe it's mentioned in the Qur'an anywhere, after all..

what is not mentioned in the quran?

Please note guys, I'm here to learn, and have a healthy debate, I'm not attacking Islam. :D

no worries.
 

Breathe

Hostis humani generis
then ask again what you want.
Ah, see my post. :)
and the word of god, clearly states that we must accept the final messenger of god, having said that, god is pleased with the words comming from this man that he tells us to follow. ( i can't find hat verse at the moment, i hate it when i can't find the verses when i need them)
Me too. :D


it is not about dissagreement, it is about protecting people. if an apostate of any religion speaks out, then so many people will get derailed from finding the right path. now imagine if all apostates spoke about their former religion, everyone would become an atheist. so wat about religion?
I think you don't put enough hope in humanity.
And what, pray tell, is wrong with atheism. Why do you think religion is that unbelievable that they have to keep people in with violence?

but then neither is killing someone who hutrs other people a valid excuse. if we go into that, then no one should be harmed.
Completely different.

1. We don't know for certain Islam is true. Buddhism, Hinduism, Mormonism, hey, even Asatru or Wicca could be the "only true path". You may believe you have proof for it, but that proof is not enough to convert the whole world, thus, you don't have proof, but faith.
2. God can punish people without human need. God is great, after all. ;)

deadly virus = deadly etternal afterlife. i know that deadly virus =/= leaving islam.
I understand the comparison, but I disagree. What if there is no such thing as hell? I find such an idea insulting to God, and killing someone who leaves Islam because they "might" tell other people about their faith is insulting to God.

yes i would, if one X left his religion and the X religion did nothing about it, then the X religion woul just be a toy for everyone to play with for a while and discard it.
Not everyone leaves a religion or "plays" in a religion. In fact, almost nobody "plays" in a religion. People should be free to decide, after all, God has given free will. Some faiths do not "work out" for people because they have disagreements with them. So you'd be more than happy for Muslims to be killed because they left X to become Muslim?

but if god tells us to carry out something then we would be opposing god, if we leave it for him.
I know, and this is what killing someone who leaves Islam is. :)

first of all what does compulsion mean? i don't think i understand this word very well, i was looking it up before, but never got a clear answer.
Compulsion = forcefulness.
In Islam, it is forbidden to force someone into the faith. Within this same sentence, it's easy to understand it's forbidden to keep someone in it against their will.

yes that is correct

what are we speaking about here?
the prophets of Allah (swt) never sined, so since they never sined we can say that they never lied, a sin is equal to a lie. i do not know if there is any verse that says prophets do not sin, so i do not know from where i know that. maybe just logic.

the hadith cannot be fabricated if it does not conradict other hadiths or the quran and the sunnah.
Thus we can work out, this hadith is fabricated, because of the verse in the Qur'an where there is no compulsion in religion, and considering that free will exists in Islam, killing someone for leaving Islam should be considered both an act of shirk and in fact, also a version apostasy - ignoring the words of God and taking them into one's own hands, instead of trusting in God.

what is not mentioned in the quran?
no worries.
That Muhammad never sinned or made a mistake. I've heard that some verses of the Qur'an recall Allah forgiving Muhammad's mistakes, though I can't recall if this is true or not. Please find out for me? :)
 

Gharib

I want Khilafah back
Ah, see my post. :)

will do.

I think you don't put enough hope in humanity.
And what, pray tell, is wrong with atheism. Why do you think religion is that unbelievable that they have to keep people in with violence?

no one is forced into religion.

Completely different.

but it isn't

1. We don't know for certain Islam is true. Buddhism, Hinduism, Mormonism, hey, even Asatru or Wicca could be the "only true path". You may believe you have proof for it, but that proof is not enough to convert the whole world, thus, you don't have proof, but faith.

the whole world is not meant to be muslim, Allah says; Allah does not guide the wicked" and the best example for that is Abu Lahab and his wife, the uncle of Muhammed (saws) after whom a chapter of the quran is dedicated, saying that he will die as a non muslim, 10 years prior to his death. an if god did not close his heart, he could have dissproved islam with the following simple words " i am a muslim, or la ilah ha ilallah" then islam would have not been here today if he had said that when the chapter was revealed.

2. God can punish people without human need. God is great, after all. ;)

but god is the master, so the slave ussualy does some work for master if the master tells him to. god could also not have chosen a prophet and just send the book down to us from the sky, he is great right?

I understand the comparison, but I disagree. What if there is no such thing as hell?

well what if there is?

I find such an idea insulting to God, and killing someone who leaves Islam because they "might" tell other people about their faith is insulting to God.

well insulting god infront of ohers is much more insulting to god.
how do you know that god is insulted by such an idea anyway?


Not everyone leaves a religion or "plays" in a religion. In fact, almost nobody "plays" in a religion. People should be free to decide, after all, God has given free will.

yeah and he has aslo given us a brain to think and study and analyse, so if someone wanted to know islam they can study it and live amongs the muslims, but they do not need to declare the shahada and then to try islam and change their mind after the 30 day expiry period, that stuff does not work in religion, religion is not a game, life is not a game.

Some faiths do not "work out" for people because they have disagreements with them.

so if there are dissagreements or contradictions then clearly that religion is not true. and in islam there are no contradictions.

So you'd be more than happy for Muslims to be killed because they left X to become Muslim?

i would not be happy about it, but thats the religion they chose.

I know, and this is what killing someone who leaves Islam is. :)

i don't what you are reffering to here, i will read my statement to which you have responded to.

Compulsion = forcefulness.
In Islam, it is forbidden to force someone into the faith. Within this same sentence, it's easy to understand it's forbidden to keep someone in it against their will.

yes you are right, that is not allowed in islam. so before i come to a conclussion about the meaning of the verse, i have to do my research on it.

Thus we can work out, this hadith is fabricated, because of the verse in the Qur'an where there is no compulsion in religion, and considering that free will exists in Islam, killing someone for leaving Islam should be considered both an act of shirk and in fact, also a version apostasy - ignoring the words of God and taking them into one's own hands, instead of trusting in God.

what if the hadith is real and only applies to hypocrites (people who anounce they are muslims only to defame islam and then become an apostate), how do you know that it is not reffering to these people only but all the apostates?


That Muhammad never sinned or made a mistake. I've heard that some verses of the Qur'an recall Allah forgiving Muhammad's mistakes, though I can't recall if this is true or not. Please find out for me? :)

no actually Allah (swt) tells him not to make unallowed that wich Allah has made allowed or why do you not do something that Allah (swt) has given permission to be done. it's something like that, but Muhammed (saws) is never mentioned in the quran or the hadith as amking any mistake.

i do not know what it is about exactly but it i sort of like that, but my wording isn't as in the quran, thats just how i remember it.
 

Gharib

I want Khilafah back
odion

what exactly are we speaking of now?

that islam does not kill apostates or that islam does and you want me to prove why? i don't know how to do that because i believe apostates are not killed, thats from my own reasoning though, and i am wrong in declaring that, so i will be neutral on the issue from now on.

you can ask anything you want if you wish.
 

keithnurse

Active Member
Response: Why is the death penalty wrong for apostates? If someone tries to take away your life or does something to you which makes it difficult for you to live are you wrong for defending yourself from such threat even if it means death to the person?
If a person leaves Islam that does not harm your life one bit, it also does NOT interfere with you practicing your religion. I am NOT saying that you are misunderstanding Islam. By defending the death penalty for people who leave Islam you are CORRECTLY understanding Islam. AND that means Islam ITSELF is wrong about this issue. Every individual person on earth should have the absolute right to change from any religion to any other religion for any reason he sees fit without any threats to his life or without loosing his job or family or home. If you are interested in what an Islamic scholar has to say about this go to:
www.islamqa.com/en/ref/811
www.islamqa.com/enref/14231
 

Alla Prima

Well-Known Member
the prophets of Allah (swt) never sined, so since they never sined we can say that they never lied, a sin is equal to a lie.

That killing someone who criticizes Islam is not a sin yet lieing IS reveals the perversion of Islam. It's a shame Muslims cannot see this.
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
If a person leaves Islam that does not harm your life one bit, it also does NOT interfere with you practicing your religion. I am NOT saying that you are misunderstanding Islam. By defending the death penalty for people who leave Islam you are CORRECTLY understanding Islam. AND that means Islam ITSELF is wrong about this issue. Every individual person on earth should have the absolute right to change from any religion to any other religion for any reason he sees fit without any threats to his life or without loosing his job or family or home. If you are interested in what an Islamic scholar has to say about this go to:
www.islamqa.com/en/ref/811
www.islamqa.com/enref/14231

Response: You haven't answered the question. The question is why is the death penalty wrong for someone who aims to cause death to you? If someone tries to kill a person and the person has to kill them in self defense, is this wrong?
 

Breathe

Hostis humani generis
odion

what exactly are we speaking of now?
I forgot... :D

that islam does not kill apostates or that islam does and you want me to prove why? i don't know how to do that because i believe apostates are not killed, thats from my own reasoning though, and i am wrong in declaring that, so i will be neutral on the issue from now on.

you can ask anything you want if you wish.
Ah, that's it, I remember now.
Whether it was really the will of Muhammad, and ultimately Allah, to kill apostates, and the implications behind whether or not such actions are legitimate to the faith with regards to the Qur'anic concepts of free will and no compulsion in religion. :)
 

Breathe

Hostis humani generis
Response: You haven't answered the question. The question is why is the death penalty wrong for someone who aims to cause death to you? If someone tries to kill a person and the person has to kill them in self defense, is this wrong?
Because someone leaving Islam isn't trying to harm you. :)
 

keithnurse

Active Member
Response: You haven't answered the question. The question is why is the death penalty wrong for someone who aims to cause death to you? If someone tries to kill a person and the person has to kill them in self defense, is this wrong?
No, it is not wrong to kill someone in self defense. What does this have to do with death penalty for apostates from Islam? There is NO connection between killing someone in self defense and the death penalty for people who leave Islam. If a Muslim leaves Islam that is no threat to you at all.
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
(Quote Fatihah)You haven't answered the question. The question is why is the death penalty wrong for someone who aims to cause death to you? If someone tries to kill a person and the person has to kill them in self defense, is this wrong?"

Odion said:
Because someone leaving Islam isn't trying to harm you. :)[end quote]

Response: That does not answer the question.
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
No, it is not wrong to kill someone in self defense. What does this have to do with death penalty for apostates from Islam? There is NO connection between killing someone in self defense and the death penalty for people who leave Islam. If a Muslim leaves Islam that is no threat to you at all.

Response: Then you should have no difficulty in the death penalty for apostates. The ruling for apostasy is the same.
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
Your reason for why killing an apostate is legitimate to Islam by claiming aggression does not answer the question. :no::no::no::no::no:

Response: Of course not. It can only answer "the" question if it was said to answer "the" question. The statement is not an answer to "the" question, (whatever "the" question is) so your statement has no relevance.
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
If a Muslim leaves Islam that is no threat to you therefore it is NOT the same as someone threatening your life.

Response: I never claimed that a muslim leaving islam is a threat to me so your statement is untrue. But a person who leaves islam and tries to kill me and I kill him in sel-defense is the same as someone threatening my life.
 
Top