Did you actually read the link you posted?
Why yes I did,
an agnostic is someone who neither believes nor disbelieves there is a God
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Did you actually read the link you posted?
an agnostic is someone who neither believes nor disbelieves there is a God
To my understanding:
Agnostic atheist - Do not deny the possibility of a god.
I don't think atheist entertain the possibility, do they?
Most of them do. I think the idea of a deity is highly improbable, however, I'll change my mind the second sufficient evidence is presented. And I think you'll find that most atheist are the same way. Anything could be a possibility, but it's not about what's possible, it's about whats probable. And thats where the distinction lies.
Who wouldn't change their mind?
I don't understand why a distinction is even necessary?
Why yes I did,
Who wouldn't change their mind?
I don't understand why a distinction is even necessary?
Reverend Rick said:How about it, what is the difference between the two?
I don't see how these hybid beliefs play any part of this discussion other than to confuse.
A Theist believes in God.
An Atheist does not believe in God.
An Agnostic does not believe or disbelieve in God.
Actually if you think about it, an Agnostic has the most sound reasoning and is the most open minded of the three.
An Agnostic accepts that there is no proof either way, which honestly is the truth of the matter if you use reasoning and not probability in your thinking.
Well, in the very first paragraph it says that there are agnostic atheists and agnostic theists
Yes it does, but this thread is not about these hybid beliefs.
I don't see how these hybid beliefs play any part of this discussion other than to confuse.
A Theist believes in God.
An Atheist does not believe in God.
An Agnostic does not believe or disbelieve in God.
Actually if you think about it, an Agnostic has the most sound reasoning and is the most open minded of the three.
An Agnostic accepts that there is no proof either way, which honestly is the truth of the matter if you use reasoning and not probability in your thinking.
I follow your reasoning, but not all people think exactly like you do, therefore the need for the two different beliefs.Exactly - and no proof either way should logically result in an absence of belief in the existence of god, i.e., atheism ("weak" atheism for those who make that distinction).
Reverend Rick said:I don't see how these hybid beliefs play any part of this discussion other than to confuse.
A Theist believes in God.
An Atheist does not believe in God.
An Agnostic does not believe or disbelieve in God.
Actually if you think about it, an Agnostic has the most sound reasoning and is the most open minded of the three.
agnostic-definition.com said:Famous Agnostics: Then and Now
Theres a rapid increase in the number of agnostics today who believe that there is no absolute answer for unsolvable issues like the existence or non-existence of God. Among these skeptics are famous agnostics like the person who coined the word agnostic, Thomas Henry Huxley. He described his agnostic point of view about the mortality of man and the existence of a spiritual entity as unsolvable and has no absolute answers. He neither affirmed nor denied that the spiritual existence can be presented with solid evidence. And with his coined term agnostic, the belief began to be popular and densely examined by religious scholars and philosophers. Among the famous agnostics is Robert G. Ingersoll, an Illinois lawyer and politician and referred to as the Great Agnostic. He blatantly questioned if there is a supernatural power and if man is immortal. He was quoted saying that he did not deny it; he just doesnt know and he does not believe.
Another famous agnostic is Bertrand Russell, a philosopher who declared his belief that there are no profound answers about omnipresence and other deities. He challenged the readers of his book to stand on their own feet and look earnestly at the world without fear of expressing ones thoughts to question things regarding their spiritual faith.
Listed below are some of the famous agnostics categorized in their respective fields.
Science and Technology
Writers and Authors
- Albert Einstein
- Charles Darwin
- Marie Curie
- Carl Sagan
- Sir David Attenborough
- Francis Crick
- Stephen Jay Gould
- Milton Friedman
- Emile Durkheim
- Ludwig von Mises
- Paul Nurse
- Sherwin B. Nuland
- George Olah
- Peter Schuster
- Steve Wozniak
Philosophy
- Jorge Luis Borges
- Henry Cadbury
- Mark Twain
- Frederick James Furvinall
- Charles Templeton
- Matt Greoning
- Dan Savage
- H.L. Mencken
- Margaret Atwood
- Martin Amis
- Tony Kushner
- Piers Anthony
- Ibn Warraq
- A.J Jacobs
- Umberto Eco
Business
- Protagoras
- Fred Edwords
- Karl R. Popper
- Michael Schmidt- Salomon
- Anthony Kenny
- James Hall
Politics and Law
- Warren Buffett
- Bill Gates
- Ted Turner
Media Arts and Entertainment
- Michelle Bachelet
- Winston Churchill
- Clement Attlee
- Helen Clark
- John Key
- Wim Kok
- Clarence Darrow
- Willem Drees
- Heinz Fischer
- Carlos Gaviria Diaz
- Bob Hawke
- Esther Ouwehand
- Bruno Kreisky
- Ricardo Lagos
- Mariette Hamer
- Boris van der Ham
- Jan Marijnissen
- George Lincoln Rokwell
- Gough Whitlam
- Joop den Uyl
- Jose Luis Rodrigue Zapatero
- Gerrit Zalm
- Jawaharlal Nehru
These are only a few of thefamous agnostics that are well known.
- Tom Bergeron
- Larry King
- Dave Matthews
- Carrie Fisher
- Richard Dreyfuss
- Bob Hoskins
- Roman Polanski
- Sean Penn
- Brad Pitt
- Antonio Banderas
- Keanu Reeves
- Monica Belluci
- Susie Bright
- James Taylor
- Uma Thurman
- Rob Steiger
- Zac Efron
- Matt Stone
I follow your reasoning, but not all people think exactly like you do, therefore the need for the two different beliefs.
If everyone followed your logic, there would be no need for Agnosticism
How about it, what is the difference between the two?
I don't know how you come up with these statements as characterizing agnosticism, but to firmly concluded that "god is unknown or unknowable" would presuppose there is such an entity, and agnostics don't do this. In main they simply say "I don't know if there's a god or not."Reverend Rick said:To me, an agnostic by definition has an open mind.
What is inherently open minded about having firmly concluded that "god" is unknown or unknowable?
Please allow me to use your logic on something different however.If everyone followed my logic there'd be no need for atheism, theism, or agnosticism, but the world can't be perfect.
Please allow me to use your logic on something different however.
We are outside away from any communication devices. No radio, TV, weather channel app on our phone.
The sky is clear and the wind is calm.
I say, I believe it is going to rain tonight we should start bringing in the lawn furniture so it will not be all wet.
You say to me, "Do you have any reason or proof it will rain?"
I say, No proof, I just feel it in my bones it will rain.
The situation now is there is no proof or disproof it will rain so you decide to leave the furniture out based on your logic by default.
The Agnostic says, your both ignorant, sit down and have another beer and quit worrying about a bunch of stuff we have no control over.
Right, sitting down and having another beer also involves leaving the furniture out.