Yeah no, I don't buy into the whole "Christians are the villains of history" narrative. When judging medieval history, it's really important to note the social context utterly alien to our own. The Inquisition has been absurdly exaggerated, the Crusades happened in a context where two thirds of the Christian world had been annexed by Muslim hordes, and the the colonisation of the new world had little to do with religion. It was about glorious empire.
Exaggerated? So how many innocents actually were slaughtered by the Church?
Are you that desperate to spill you self-righteous bile that you're going to assert the world wars as religious? This is naught but rhetoric. Neither world war had much at all to do with religion, and tribal war is par the course in Africa. You seem to be under the impression when ever something bad happens it must be the consequence of the religious beliefs of the involved parties.
The "Christian" churches on both sides of these world wars urged their adherents to support the war effort, is that not so? And in Rwanda, did not priests and nuns, and their parishioners, share in slaughtering innocent men, women, and children?
An apostate of course, being anyone who doesn't accept the rhetoric and propaganda of a heretical fringe American sect founded in the late nineteenth century. Kinda ironic that such a group throws around the word apostate so lightly; they kind of have to considering that much if not all of their teaching has no basis but the ramblings of self-appointed experts about what the Bible "really" says.
I'm sorry, but it's beyond ludicrous.
