Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It’s clear God did not sanction Lot giving his daughters to those evil men, otherwise the angels wouldn’t have intervened. When and if you admit that you can clarify the other scripture and will answer that, if not then that’s it.
I have to admit it is most comical watching you chase your tail.
Sorry, but that is a false dichotomy. As you know the angels would have been S.O.L. if the crowd had iron wheels. Then Lot's action might have been necessary.
Or you unwilling to admit what that you said that God sanctioned Lot giving his daughters to be raped. If not then you agree with me that God did not sanction Lot. Which is it? Did God sanction that act as righteous or not? Simple to answer
Approved of would have been a better choice in words. Since Lot was considered to be "righteous" it is reasonable to conclude that God approved of Lot's actions.
Wrong to assume that because someone is righteous in God’s sight that everything they do is approved of God. Not a scriptural principle or view that God has.
Women as property is supported by scripture. You could treat Hebrew women far differently from how you could treat Hebrew men. The rules of slavery supposedly from your God demonstrates this. A Hebrew man could sell his daughter into slavery. At times sex slavery and there was no end to it. He could not sell his sons into slavery. Verse after verse shows that a woman was considered to be property. If a man owns slaves he could give a slave "wife" to a Hebrew male slave. Male Hebrew slaves were the equivalent of indentured servants. But when his term was done the "wife", and any of their children still belonged to the master. If he wanted to stay with his wife and kids he had to volunteer for lifelong slavery. That tells us that even though women were treated as property that there were some decent Hebrews even in those days. And there were fellow Hebrews willing to take advantage of the rules of their God.
You won’t answer, lol I hear you, I never said, oh maybe I did, let me blame someone.
#1217
That was not an answer to his post. The question is was Lot considered righteous. And the Bible supports that not only was he considered to be righteous, but that act itself would have been seen as righteous by God.
This is a false statement and premise, will explain one more time and then that’s it.
How is it false? You do not just get to claim that something is false, you must be able to demonstrate that it is false.
Multiple times and if you still can’t get it then moving on, if you can’t see that you won’t see anything after that and we’re done then, thank-you very much.
No, at best you only cherry picked verses from the Bible. That "proof" was refuted when other supplied verses that said the opposite. It is all but impossible to "prove" anything with the Bible since it is a smorgasbord of being on both sides of almost everything:
Smorgasborg
I understand that you’re confused about the Bible and don’t understand it. Without the Spirit you can’t.
Your lack of the Spirit is not why you are confused.
ROTFLMAO