KWED
Scratching head, scratching knee
Take a closer look:
Or are you still hearing nonsense.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Take a closer look:
Or are you still hearing nonsense.
The problem is that your god seems to think that anyone who does not submit to Islam therefore "wishes evil" against Islam.The problem is, if G-d teaches us [in scripture etc.] to never engage in war, those that wish evil against us will have no difficulty in their plight.
Not good translators? Are you actually making stuff up? At that time Islam was full of highly educated people in all fields. It's known that they picked up from Greek works and expanded on them.
Many classical works, including those of Aristotle, were transmitted from Greek to Syriac, then to Arabic, then to Latin in the Middle Ages. Aristotle's zoology remained dominant in its field for two thousand years.[v
scholars such as Al-Kindi[3] translated Indian, Assyrian, Sasanian (Persian) and Greek knowledge, including the works of Aristotle, into Arabic. These translations supported advances by scientists across the Islamic world.[4]
Medieval Islamic scientific achievements encompassed a wide range of subject areas, especially mathematics, astronomy, and medicine.[4] Other subjects of scientific inquiry included physics, alchemy and chemistry, ophthalmology, and geography and cartography.[6]
The Islamic Golden Age (roughly between 786 and 1258) spanned the period of the Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258), with stable political structures and flourishing trade. Major religious and cultural works of the Islamic empire were translated into Arabic and occasionally Persian. Islamic culture inherited Greek, Indic, Assyrian and Persian influences.
Science in the medieval Islamic world - Wikipedia
You need to talk with a learned person about that, but to my understanding, Muslims should not attack those who don't attack them. Muslims should also not break treaties unless the other party breaks them.There is a passage in the Quran that says to attack non-believers and some that say live and let live. So neither side would be completely correct or incorrect if trying to make a policy about peace or war.
The Quran says to "fight the disbelievers until all religion is for Allah" (8:38)You need to talk with a learned person about that, but to my understanding, Muslims should not attack those who don't attack them.
Muhammad ended the treaty of Hudaybiyyah and invaded Mecca, even after the Meccans had sent an emissary to Muhammad to plead for peace and to maintain the treaty.Muslims should also not break treaties unless the other party breaks them.
It's not my strong subject .. no...you have already admitted that you don't know about Islamic history.
And there lies one of your biggest problems. You are not interested in truth or facts, only reassurance.It's not my strong subject .. no.
..but I would believe what a Muslim tells me over an atheist,
any day of the week.
So just to be clear... if you are in a lecture about Middle Eastern history and a world renowned professor (who is also an atheist) in the subject explains the historical issues around the conquest of Mecca - if the person sitting next to you (who is a Muslim but with no qualifications in Middle Eastern history) says "that's rubbish", you will believe him and reject the professor's lecture?It's not my strong subject .. no.
..but I would believe what a Muslim tells me over an atheist,
any day of the week.
Also notice you ignored my argument refuting your claim that the Quran only permits fighting in self-defence.It's not my strong subject .. no.
..but I would believe what a Muslim tells me over an atheist,
any day of the week.
Well, you would say that.You are not interested in truth or facts, only reassurance.
No, you said it!...Well, you would say that.
I don't need to show it. The bad elements are apparent to anyone reading the Quran with an open mind. I am merely explaining to you why your confirmation bias driven narrative is flawed.You have an agenda of showing Islam in a bad light.
And yet here you are, day after day, making your arguments and claims.I'd rather read the Qur'an than respond to silly arguments from anonymous 'trolls'
You are not asking about Islam as per OP.BTW, don't think you understand what "troll" means.
Oh behave!You are not asking about Islam as per OP.
..hence you are trolling
I have not claimed to be an "expert". I have merely presented evidence and rational argument on the basis of the study that I have done - that you seem to be going to great lengths to avoid addressing.while claiming to be an 'expert'
The Bhagavad Gita is an entire philosophical discussion on the nature of war, framed as a discussion between Krishna and a prince.
All this stuff about God teaching stuff is pure speculation. As is a correct understanding of an afterlife. Just as Krishna didn't really speak wisdom to Arjuna no scripture is divine words from anything except people.
Political systems can lead to war but so can religions. Religions will war between each other as well as groups with different interpretations of scripture. There is a passage in the Quran that says to attack non-believers and some that say live and let live. So neither side would be completely correct or incorrect if trying to make a policy about peace or war.
KWED said: ↑
You are not interested in truth or facts, only reassurance.
Well, you would say that.
You have an agenda of showing Islam in a bad light.
Your last three posts have attacked KWED rather than addressing what he has posted, while also making the astonishing admission you don't care about truth facts or sound reasoning, you'd "believe a Muslim over an atheist any day of the week."You are not asking about Islam as per OP.
..hence you are trolling while claiming to be an 'expert'
I'm talking about the Bible
and the Quran doesn't contain ANY GREEK TRANSLATIONS.
am not talking about ordinary knowledge. In Islam, you are to gain knowledge from anywhere. Arabs were extremely knowledgeable and expanded the knowledge we use today and many benefits from it til this day. Like the number 0 and algebra....without that...don't think much of the world would be like it is today. But I'm not comparing knowledge from Arab to Greek or vice versa.
Talkin about the Bible...why do you have to go so far?
'Fraid so.I showed you god as the husband, I also showed you the wife, and the children.
It is a repeat of what I've been saying and showing the whole time in this thread.
Thy wife shall be as a fruitful vine by the sides of thine house: thy children like olive plants round about thy table. Psalm 128:3
The fruitful vine is the grape/wine
The olive plants is the olive/oil
Level1 - Level2 - Level3
Corn - Oil - Wine
Are you having issues with comprehending that?
Ironically, all those points require you to cherry-pick passages and ignore contradictory ones. It also requires you to accept one particular scholarly interpretation of a passage and ignore others.you cannot just pick things out of the Quran and say it means that.
1. Islam urges Muslims to show kindness to parents even if they are non-Muslims.
2. Islam advises Muslims to treat neighbors kindly even if they are not Muslim.
3. Islam encourages Muslims to ensure justice and show kindness to non-Muslims who are not fighting Muslims.
4. Islam prohibits killing non-Muslims living under Muslim rule.
5. Islam prohibits wronging a mu‘ahid, (non-Muslim living in a Muslim land)detracting from his rights, or burdening him with more work.
6. Islam prohibits committing transgression and commands justice.