So,
not believing something is
a belief?
Seriously, if you can't see why that's wrong, I can only assume you don't understand the English language.
Except for those that agree with me.
Who are...?
Are you truly that naive that you can't realize anything processed and perceived as true is a belief?
I do not believe X. Hence, I hold no belief with regards to X.
Now, where exactly is belief coming into that position?
I think this is your way of expressing your inability to comprehend something that doesn't agree with you.
No, that's exactly what
you're doing. Hence why the vast majority of atheists - and the Oxford English dictionary - do not agree with you.
Atheism is only necessarily a lack of belief,
Let's repeat that.
Atheism is only necessarily a lack of belief,
Congratulations, you got it!
in which necessity dictates that one who views in such a way, beliefs that it is, in such a way.
And what "way" do atheists believe it is? If an atheist
lacks a belief then they do not
believe in any particular way about God, unless that atheist is of a
particular position on God that is that they
believe a God does not exist. Even if this is the case, they still
lack a belief that there is one and come under the broader definition of atheist. Hence, being an atheist says nothing about what a person believes, only that they
lack a particular belief, and atheism in and of itself is
therefore not a belief.
Good lord, Orias, when will this finally sink in? Just admit that you're wrong already.