Curious George
Veteran Member
YesExactly. It's a very strange phenomenon. I wonder, is it possible that anyone can maintain both propositions as true simultaneous in a normal brain?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
YesExactly. It's a very strange phenomenon. I wonder, is it possible that anyone can maintain both propositions as true simultaneous in a normal brain?
I thought 80ism was a belief that stonewash was cool.How could there be a term "atheist" when there was no term "theist"? None of those terms simply didn't exist yet.Seriously? No. For deism we have adeism.
I doubt it.
Provide sources.
Since "atheist" came first, "Theism" could therefore only mean one thing
You're the one playing at avoiding answering to the contradiction.Yes it is. Do you notice that the word "atheism" is included in the expression "strong atheism"?The expression "strong atheism" consists of two words, the word "strong" and the word "atheism". The word atheism means "absence of belief in the existence of gods" and the word "strong" indicates that not only is there an "absence of belief in the existence of gods" but there's in addition a presence of belief that gods don't exist. Do you have any real interest in understanding this or are you just playing?
For someone who spend so much time quoting the dictionary, you probably should be able to work this one out yourself. Now, where can we find out about the history of word usage?
1678 R. Cudworth True Intellect. Syst. Universe Pref. sig. ***2, Nor indeed out of a meer Partiall Regard to that Cause of Theism neither, which we were engaged in.
1709 Ld. Shaftesbury Moralists i. ii. 28, I consider..that to be a settled Christian, it is necessary to be first of all a good Theist. For Theism can only be oppos'd to Polytheism, or Atheism.
a1774 A. Tucker Light of Nature (1834) II. 323 We find the introduction of theism, that is, the doctrine of an intelligent Agent, the Author of nature,..claimed for Pythagoras.
1841 M. Elphinstone Hist. India I. ii. iv. 163 The theism inculcated by the Védas..has been supplanted by a system of gross polytheism and idolatry.
1877 R. Flint Theism i. 18 Theism is the doctrine that the universe owes its existence, and continuance..to the reason and will of a self-existent Being... It is the doctrine that nature has a Creator and Preserver.
1888 F. L. Patton Syllabus Lect. Theism 1 (Funk) Theism may be considered religiously [as embracing] polytheism, pantheism, monotheism (theism par excellence).
http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/200296
There's no contradiction and I wrote a clear and concise and perfectly understandable explanation. Since it was just a waste of time I won't answer any more of your posts for the time being just so you know...You're the one playing at avoiding answering to the contradiction.
So roughly 100 years NOT 2000 as you erroneously claimed
We know the word atheist was used in other languages long before that. Can you find the word theist being used?
I doubt the ancients had no such use for a word describing generic belief in gods.
Anyway it still predates theist so the point still stands
They don't believe in gods.All atheists have an absence of belief in the existence of gods.
Toasters can't be theists even when they grow up.
My predictive powers are amazing!Rhetoric.
Babies can't be theists when they die in infancy. So is the atheism of babies state-dependent upon their growing up? Are they in a sort of quantum state of atheism and not-capable of atheism until they reach the threshold of cognitive capacity? Is this whole defense of labeling babies absurd? At least I can answer the last question with a resounding yes.Toasters can't be theists even when they grow up.
Yes, you've expressed your credulity several times.That's the problem, you refer to a credible term as specious.
Really? Atheos was used to describe those who denied the gods millennia before the advent of the word Theism, before the English language even existed.I doubt it.
Provide sources.
Is this whole defense of labeling babies absurd?
Atheos was used to describe those who denied the gods millennia before the advent of the word Theism, before the English language even existed.
For someone who spend so much time quoting the dictionary, you probably should be able to work this one out yourself. Now, where can we find out about the history of word usage?
1678 R. Cudworth True Intellect. Syst. Universe Pref. sig. ***2, Nor indeed out of a meer Partiall Regard to that Cause of Theism neither, which we were engaged in.
1709 Ld. Shaftesbury Moralists i. ii. 28, I consider..that to be a settled Christian, it is necessary to be first of all a good Theist. For Theism can only be oppos'd to Polytheism, or Atheism.
a1774 A. Tucker Light of Nature (1834) II. 323 We find the introduction of theism, that is, the doctrine of an intelligent Agent, the Author of nature,..claimed for Pythagoras.
1841 M. Elphinstone Hist. India I. ii. iv. 163 The theism inculcated by the Védas..has been supplanted by a system of gross polytheism and idolatry.
1877 R. Flint Theism i. 18 Theism is the doctrine that the universe owes its existence, and continuance..to the reason and will of a self-existent Being... It is the doctrine that nature has a Creator and Preserver.
1888 F. L. Patton Syllabus Lect. Theism 1 (Funk) Theism may be considered religiously [as embracing] polytheism, pantheism, monotheism (theism par excellence).
http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/200296
What about when it meant deism?
What about dead people? Are they atheists or theists?Curious position. If a boxer is a theist and is knocked out he stops being a theist until he regains consciousness again? If a boxer is not a theist and is knocked out he stops being not a theist until he regains consciousness again?
We know the word atheist was used in other languages long before that. Can you find the word theist being used?
I doubt the ancients had much use for a word describing generic belief in gods.
Anyway it still predates theist so the point still stands
What about dead people? Are they atheists or theists?
If they are in heaven or hell they're probably theists. If not who knows....What about dead people? Are they atheists or theists?
If they are in heaven or hell they're probably theists. If not who knows....
What do you have against dead people?Neither. They're in the same category as rocks. They lack belief, but they lack the concept of lack, too.