• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists and God

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Sure we can discuss, but not when everyone gets their backs up and not with sarcasm. One poster said I owe an apology to everyone. I don't owe anything to anyone.

Its seems to me everyone gets angry when, their beliefs are put into question. Discuss it in a mature fashion, without the sarcasm and attack on character and I am happy to debate. Like adults, not children.

1869299_a96476631c.jpg

You don't seem to have a good grasp on what's been going on here. You made some ignorant and outlandish claims about atheism. People rightly called you out on the claims after you asked for opinions. You showed that you can't handle criticism because you are pretty well set in your ignorant assumptions. You can question beliefs all you want. You can ask why we are atheists, and you'll get good, intelligent answers, but when you say stuff like "For some reason atheists are in a war to remove God from society...They are misguided by today’s society and the world around them." and generally just making condescending claims about atheists, you don't invite constructive criticism.

If you had started a thread by asking "Why are you an atheist? Why don't you see God in the world around you?" and/or other similar questions, you would have gotten a much better response than saying "Atheists are dumb, they can't even see God in the world, and they're being led astray by the devil, but they don't even know it". And worst of all you're now misusing Calvin and Hobbes strips. That's sacrilege.
 

gerobbins

What's your point?
Really? Stalin killed people for failing to be atheists? I'm not familiar with those incidents. Tell us more.

Do you understand the difference between "happened to be an atheist," and "an action committed on behalf of atheism?" For example, Jeffrey Dahmer was a mass murderer and a Christian, but he didn't commit murder on behalf of Christianity. People like Pope Innocent III did that. See the difference?


Do you deny that Stalin oppressed the Church in the Soviet Union? Do deny that Stalin had millions of his citizens killed? (Many of them Christians and/Jews?
Do you deny that anyone that would threaten him would be arrested?
Come on now.
Religion was not a freedom in Soviet Russia.
Do you deny that Stalin did not oppress the church in Russia?

Do I deny that many atrocities were committed in the name of religion? No I don’t.
So, on that same note how come you can’t admit that atrocities were committed under a regime that was purely atheist?

You see this is why; I am tired of this thread. You all get your nighttimes in a knot whenever anyone says anything about atheism in a negative fashion.

What I said prior to this is the Majority (99.9%) of Atheists are good people.

Just as the Majority of Christians (or any other religious denomination) are good people as well.

Look at the Salvation Army for example, can you deny they are not good people? They are selfless and do not pass judgment on anyone. They are first to help out in a crisis and turn away no one.

It’s the extremists that give religion a bad name. Just as there are extremists in the Atheist circle as well, that gives it a bad name.

http://www.alternet.org/belief/143674/are_the_%22new_atheists%22_as_bad_as_christian_fundamentalists

(I did not write the above, I am only trying to make a point)

As far as my beliefs go, yes I believe in God. So what? How does my belief affect your life?

Can, I prove with an absolute doubt that the universe was created? In my opinion the universe is something so spectacular and complex that it had to be created. Do I understand the complexities? Not on a bet. But I don’t believe it just happened.

As for who created God? As far as my belief goes, God always was and will be.
Can I explain it? No. But then again no one can explain how the universe just happened for those who deny it being created.

I am not a fundamentalist, far from it. I don’t deny the existence of the dinosaurs; I don’t believe the earth is only 6000 years old. I do believe evolution is part of God’s design.

As far the Bible goes, it’s the fundamentalists that distort what it is saying and their interpitation of it. Christ’s teachings in the Bible taught us to basically love one another that’s it in a nutshell.



 

gerobbins

What's your point?
You don't seem to have a good grasp on what's been going on here. You made some ignorant and outlandish claims about atheism. People rightly called you out on the claims after you asked for opinions. You showed that you can't handle criticism because you are pretty well set in your ignorant assumptions. You can question beliefs all you want. You can ask why we are atheists, and you'll get good, intelligent answers, but when you say stuff like "For some reason atheists are in a war to remove God from society...They are misguided by today’s society and the world around them." and generally just making condescending claims about atheists, you don't invite constructive criticism.

If you had started a thread by asking "Why are you an atheist? Why don't you see God in the world around you?" and/or other similar questions, you would have gotten a much better response than saying "Atheists are dumb, they can't even see God in the world, and they're being led astray by the devil, but they don't even know it". And worst of all you're now misusing Calvin and Hobbes strips. That's sacrilege.


Oh lighten up.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Do you deny that Stalin oppressed the Church in the Soviet Union? Do deny that Stalin had millions of his citizens killed? (Many of them Christians and/Jews?
Do you deny that anyone that would threaten him would be arrested?
Come on now.
Religion was not a freedom in Soviet Russia.
Do you deny that Stalin did not oppress the church in Russia?
Stalin oppressed anyone he considered a political enemy. This included churches, but it also included secular humanists.

Stalin didn't give a rat's hind quarters about whether people believed in God. But he did recognize that religious denominations and certain groups of religious people (among many others) held political influence and could potentially undermine Stalin's own power.

Stalin's oppression came from the fact that he was a megalomanical psychopath only worried about his own interests. It didn't come from having some sort of hate on for God.

Look at the Salvation Army for example, can you deny they are not good people? They are selfless and do not pass judgment on anyone. They are first to help out in a crisis and turn away no one.
They target people in need for proselytization. I suppose they meet a need, but their tactics leave a lot to be desired. Personally, I rank them higher than those payday loan places, but not much higher.

The Salvation Army takes advantage of people's vulnerability to sell to them. I strongly dislike these kind of tactics.

It’s the extremists that give religion a bad name. Just as there are extremists in the Atheist circle as well, that gives it a bad name.
No, it's not just the extremists. Mainstream religion has quite a bit to answer for.

Edit: and I'm not talking about the Crusades or other things that happened centuries ago. I mean right now.

As far as my beliefs go, yes I believe in God. So what? How does my belief affect your life?
Well, that depends: what actions have you taken on the basis of your belief?

And do you claim a tax deductions for your tithes?
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Do you deny that Stalin oppressed the Church in the Soviet Union? Do deny that Stalin had millions of his citizens killed? (Many of them Christians and/Jews?
Do you deny that anyone that would threaten him would be arrested?
Come on now.
Religion was not a freedom in Soviet Russia.
Do you deny that Stalin did not oppress the church in Russia?
Nobody denied any of those things. What we're denying is that they were a direct (or even indirect) result of Stalin's atheism.

Do I deny that many atrocities were committed in the name of religion? No I don’t.
So, on that same note how come you can’t admit that atrocities were committed under a regime that was purely atheist?
Sure there were, but they were not committed because of atheism. Nobody has ever used atheism as a justification or motive to commit any kind of atrocity.


You see this is why; I am tired of this thread. You all get your nighttimes in a knot whenever anyone says anything about atheism in a negative fashion.
No, we're getting our "nighttimes in a knot" because you made a series of ignorant assumptions and refuse to respond to their refutations.


What I said prior to this is the Majority (99.9%) of Atheists are good people.

Just as the Majority of Christians (or any other religious denomination) are good people as well.
And...?

Look at the Salvation Army for example, can you deny they are not good people? They are selfless and do not pass judgment on anyone. They are first to help out in a crisis and turn away no one.
Where has anybody here, atheist or otherwise, suggested that all Christians are bad people, or that Christianity has not been used as a motivation for countless acts of generosity or kindness?

It’s the extremists that give religion a bad name. Just as there are extremists in the Atheist circle as well, that gives it a bad name.
Except that there is no atheist doctrine that tells people to go out and kill or harm others in the name of their belief (or lack of belief). There are, on the other hand, passages in many religious texts that tell their followers to do exactly that. The fact that such passages exist - and the fact that people still exist who follow those passages - shows a fundamental problem with religious reasoning that has to be addressed. You cannot just shrug your shoulders and say "they're extremists, so they don't count". They read the same Bible as you do, and they hold the same degree of faith in it as you do, they just choose to take certain passages which demand them to carry out atrocities as more important than you do.

Do you not see that such an attitude being created, as well as motivated and encouraged, by your belief structure shows that there is something fundamentally wrong with that perspective?

http://www.alternet.org/belief/143674/are_the_%22new_atheists%22_as_bad_as_christian_fundamentalists

(I did not write the above, I am only trying to make a point)
You're hardly going to make a point with an ill-informed and pompous article apparently written by someone who hasn't actually read anything on the people they're talking about.

As far as my beliefs go, yes I believe in God. So what? How does my belief affect your life?
Not one bit. Where did we say it did?

Can, I prove with an absolute doubt that the universe was created? In my opinion the universe is something so spectacular and complex that it had to be created. Do I understand the complexities? Not on a bet. But I don’t believe it just happened.
That's a false dichotomy. Also, argument from ignorance.

As for who created God? As far as my belief goes, God always was and will be.
Circular reasoning.

Can I explain it? No. But then again no one can explain how the universe just happened for those who deny it being created.
We have an entire field of science devoted to it as well as a comprehensive and well-evidenced theory. Did you even bother looking?

I am not a fundamentalist, far from it. I don’t deny the existence of the dinosaurs; I don’t believe the earth is only 6000 years old. I do believe evolution is part of God’s design.
You don't get brownie points for accepting reality.

As far the Bible goes, it’s the fundamentalists that distort what it is saying and their interpitation of it. Christ’s teachings in the Bible taught us to basically love one another that’s it in a nutshell.
And what about the passages that justify things such as slavery, genocide, torture, stoning, honour killing and homophobia? Do those passages just "not count"? Did the people who chose to believe in those passages just "not get the point"?
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Do I deny that many atrocities were committed in the name of religion? No I don’t.
So, on that same note how come you can’t admit that atrocities were committed under a regime that was purely atheist?

Do you not see the differences in the way you phrased it? "Atrocities in the name of religion" vs. "atrocities committed under a regime that was purely atheist", not "atrocities committed in the name of atheism". The big difference is that the religious atrocities were many times specifically in the name of religion, while the ones under the atheist regimes weren't in the name of atheism.

You see this is why; I am tired of this thread. You all get your nighttimes in a knot whenever anyone says anything about atheism in a negative fashion.

Nope, just when you make ridiculous, false claims.

Can, I prove with an absolute doubt that the universe was created? In my opinion the universe is something so spectacular and complex that it had to be created. Do I understand the complexities? Not on a bet. But I don’t believe it just happened.

OK, so if the universe is too complex and spectacular to not have been created, what created god? Wouldn't the creator have to be just as spectacular and complex to have created all this? That would mean he, too, would need a creator, and then that one needs a creator, and so on. The problem here is that you use an argument for why the universe had to have been created that doesn't work. The complexity of the universe is not evidence of its creation.

As for who created God? As far as my belief goes, God always was and will be.
Can I explain it? No. But then again no one can explain how the universe just happened for those who deny it being created.

OK, so why is it, in your opinion, that God can be eternal but the universe can't? This is a double standard. If God can be eternal, so can the universe. If the universe can be eternal, your arguments for God here fail.
 

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
Do you deny that Stalin oppressed the Church in the Soviet Union? Do deny that Stalin had millions of his citizens killed? (Many of them Christians and/Jews?
Do you deny that anyone that would threaten him would be arrested?
Come on now.
Religion was not a freedom in Soviet Russia.
Do you deny that Stalin did not oppress the church in Russia?
O.K., this post inspired me to do some research into the actions of Comrade Stalin, and I am now ready to revise my opinion. It appears that Stalin did in fact take action to repress the activities of the church, in an effort to promulgate atheism. So I'll buy that.

He also imprisoned some people for practicing or advocating their religion.

He also killed a lot of people, but I don't think for the most part he did that to advance atheism, but rather to advance Marxism as he saw it, and most importantly, Stalinism.
Do I deny that many atrocities were committed in the name of religion? No I don’t.
So, on that same note how come you can’t admit that atrocities were committed under a regime that was purely atheist?
Do you see the difference between "in the name of religion" and "a regime that was atheist?" That's my

As far as my beliefs go, yes I believe in God. So what? How does my belief affect your life?
Hey, I didn't start the thread. Didn't you start the thread to complain about atheism? Yes, I don't believe in God, so what? How does my lack of belief affect your life?
Can, I prove with an absolute doubt that the universe was created? In my opinion the universe is something so spectacular and complex that it had to be created. Do I understand the complexities? Not on a bet. But I don’t believe it just happened.

As for who created God? As far as my belief goes, God always was and will be.
Can I explain it? No. But then again no one can explain how the universe just happened for those who deny it being created.
My best guess is that the universe never happened, but is eternal.
 

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
Nobody denied any of those things. What we're denying is that they were a direct (or even indirect) result of Stalin's atheism.
I now believe that some of them were, and were done specifically to advance atheism and repress religion.

At a minimum, Marxist Atheism appears to be dangerous.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
I now believe that some of them were, and were done specifically to advance atheism and repress religion.

At a minimum, Marxist Atheism appears to be dangerous.

I would say "Stalinism" rather than "Marxist Atheism". Even if he did what he did to promote atheism, it's no different than someone committing horrible acts to promote their favorite sports team. I don't think saying that Marxist atheism is dangerous is accurate.
 

gerobbins

What's your point?
O.K., this post inspired me to do some research into the actions of Comrade Stalin, and I am now ready to revise my opinion. It appears that Stalin did in fact take action to repress the activities of the church, in an effort to promulgate atheism. So I'll buy that.

He also imprisoned some people for practicing or advocating their religion.

He also killed a lot of people, but I don't think for the most part he did that to advance atheism, but rather to advance Marxism as he saw it, and most importantly, Stalinism.
Do you see the difference between "in the name of religion" and "a regime that was atheist?" That's my

Hey, I didn't start the thread. Didn't you start the thread to complain about atheism? Yes, I don't believe in God, so what? How does my lack of belief affect your life? My best guess is that the universe never happened, but is eternal.


Ok, my complaint: People like Madalyn Murray O'Hair who is on the extreme side of athiesm. She is to Atheism to someone like Ian Paisley is to Christianity.
And if you don't know who he is, look him up. The man is truly out there.
It was activist such as she was, that gives me cause to complain.

Personally, I could care less if someone is an atheist or not, but don't go taking away my rights because I am not.

Yes, I can understand your point of view in such matters but I should have the freedom to believe just as you should have the freedom not to.

As for Stalin, I was just making a point. There are good Christians and bad and the same goes for Athiests.

I am not into typical mainstream beliefs either. You know how much flack I get because I support a gay couple who wants to get married? I ask them how a gay couple getting married affects their lives? And why do they even care?

Or the argurments I get in over the fact, that I understand evolution? And believe in the concept?
Being told, I can't believe if that is the case.

I even got into an a heated disscussion about the possiblity of life on Mars. Someone told me that that was the devil just trying to put that out.
Even arguements on how old the earth is.


So, I guess I am stuck in the middle, a disdain for me from the Believers and the non-believers. So be it. I am happy just they way I am. An an opinionated loud mouth who speaks his mind.











 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
I now believe that some of them were, and were done specifically to advance atheism and repress religion.

At a minimum, Marxist Atheism appears to be dangerous.

But such a position is not a direct result of atheism any more than somebody killing to promote a painting is a direct result of the painting. Nor is it even an indirect result of atheism, because his interpretation of atheism is still entirely unrelated to his activities which were largely inspired by political motives.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
So, I guess I am stuck in the middle, a disdain for me from the Believers and the non-believers. So be it. I am happy just they way I am. An an opinionated loud mouth who speaks his mind.

There is no disdain for you from the non-believers. The only disdain is for your use of false and ignorant assumptions and claims about atheists. I don't care what you believe; just don't start a thread with ridiculous claims about atheists and expect not to get a negative response. If you think you're a loud-mouth who speaks his mind, why would you get so bent out of shape when someone calls you out for being a loud-mouth?
 

gerobbins

What's your point?
There is no disdain for you from the non-believers. The only disdain is for your use of false and ignorant assumptions and claims about atheists. I don't care what you believe; just don't start a thread with ridiculous claims about atheists and expect not to get a negative response. If you think you're a loud-mouth who speaks his mind, why would you get so bent out of shape when someone calls you out for being a loud-mouth?

Because I am a loud mouth. You know I once thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken..

foghorn.jpg
 
Last edited:

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Ok, my complaint: People like Madalyn Murray O'Hair who is on the extreme side of athiesm. She is to Atheism to someone like Ian Paisley is to Christianity.
And if you don't know who he is, look him up. The man is truly out there.
It was activist such as she was, that gives me cause to complain.

Ian Paisley:

(to Pope John Paul II) I denounce you, Anti-Christ! I refuse you as Christ's enemy and Antichrist with all your false doctrine.

The gun is not out of Irish politics.

(on the death of Pope John XXIII) This Romish man of sin is now in Hell!


Madalyn Murray O'Hair:

An Atheist believes that a hospital should be built instead of a church. An atheist believes that deed must be done instead of prayer said. An atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death. He wants disease conquered, poverty vanished, war eliminated.

Religion has caused more misery to all of mankind in every stage of human history than any other single idea.

The relationships that people have - that are sexual, psychological, emotional - these relationships are not open to supervision by parents, schools, churches, or government. Nobody has any right to intervene at all in any kind of relationship like that.

Yes, they might as well be the same person. :rolleyes:

Madalyn Murray O'Hair is the atheist equivalent of the local minister who people generally think of as inoffensive and a little boring. People only get bothered by what she says because it's directed at them.

Your average Sunday sermon at a liberal Christian church is many times more inflammatory than anything that any of the atheist boogeymen (or women) have ever been quoted saying. It's just that we as a society have been trained to be tolerant of messages criticizing lack of faith and intolerant of messages that criticize faith.

Personally, I could care less if someone is an atheist or not, but don't go taking away my rights because I am not. Yes, I can understand your point of view in such matters but I should have the freedom to believe just as you should have the freedom not to.

Who's taking away your rights, exactly?

As for Stalin, I was just making a point. There are good Christians and bad and the same goes for Athiests.

It's a poor point, IMO.

Atheism only describes what a person doesn't believe. It says nothing about what the person does believe. I probably share more of my beliefs in common with you than I do with Stalin.

You can't tar all atheists with the same brush any more than you can tar all theists with the same brush.

Now... in the case of Christianity, I think that there are definitely ways in which the conduct of past Christians is relevant.

For instance, throughout history, Christians have frequently used the Bible to support slavery. I assume you don't (you don't, right?), so if you say that your faith and actions are guided by the Bible, how do you know that you're right and they're wrong? What's the correct interpretation? And if either interpretation works, then what does it even mean to be guided by the Bible?

I am not into typical mainstream beliefs either. You know how much flack I get because I support a gay couple who wants to get married? I ask them how a gay couple getting married affects their lives? And why do they even care?

Or the argurments I get in over the fact, that I understand evolution? And believe in the concept?
Being told, I can't believe if that is the case.

I even got into an a heated disscussion about the possiblity of life on Mars. Someone told me that that was the devil just trying to put that out.
Even arguements on how old the earth is.


So, I guess I am stuck in the middle, a disdain for me from the Believers and the non-believers. So be it. I am happy just they way I am. An an opinionated loud mouth who speaks his mind.
So you don't want us to respond to you here?

It sounds like you're having issues with the company you keep, but that's hardly our responsibility.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Yea, I am interested However, I have tried and you have tried and it gets up back to the same place.

If you consider what you've done "trying", sure. I haven't seen you put forth much effort, though. If you're really interested, why don't you go ahead and respond to the constructive comments we've made about your claims?
 

gerobbins

What's your point?
[/color]
Ian Paisley:








Madalyn Murray O'Hair:







Yes, they might as well be the same person. :rolleyes:

Madalyn Murray O'Hair is the atheist equivalent of the local minister who people generally think of as inoffensive and a little boring. People only get bothered by what she says because it's directed at them.

Your average Sunday sermon at a liberal Christian church is many times more inflammatory than anything that any of the atheist boogeymen (or women) have ever been quoted saying. It's just that we as a society have been trained to be tolerant of messages criticizing lack of faith and intolerant of messages that criticize faith.


Who's taking away your rights, exactly?

[/color]
It's a poor point, IMO.

Atheism only describes what a person doesn't believe. It says nothing about what the person does believe. I probably share more of my beliefs in common with you than I do with Stalin.

You can't tar all atheists with the same brush any more than you can tar all theists with the same brush.

Now... in the case of Christianity, I think that there are definitely ways in which the conduct of past Christians is relevant.

For instance, throughout history, Christians have frequently used the Bible to support slavery. I assume you don't (you don't, right?), so if you say that your faith and actions are guided by the Bible, how do you know that you're right and they're wrong? What's the correct interpretation? And if either interpretation works, then what does it even mean to be guided by the Bible?


So you don't want us to respond to you here?

It sounds like you're having issues with the company you keep, but that's hardly our responsibility.


Your responsbibilty? I never said that.
I get the same flack on the atheist side as well, so I guess your in the same company I keep as well eh?

And since when was the last time in this century that slavery was supported by modern christians?
Please don't tell me that slavery was only a concept adhered to by Christians way back when. I mean really.


My point with Madalyn Murray O'Hair is she was to one extreme and you can't deny that fact. It was her way or no way. Just as with Paisley is,its his way or no way.
 
Top