It's not so much a matter of disliking the people who oppose Trump as much as disliking their tactics and methods. If someone is incapable of actually putting forth a well-reasoned argument and does nothing but act like a complete smart-a** (such as the individual I was addressing in the post that you quoted), then one really has to wonder.
I've seen this as a constant pattern among those who jump on the anti-Trump bandwagon. I'm not saying this about you, but there are so many who come across as parrots and political hacks. It doesn't take too long before they start resorting to ridicule, condescension, and verbal abuse - and then they wonder why people don't take them seriously or believe anything they say.
As far as which horrid decisions have been made, we can examine that on a case-by-case basis. For example, on tariffs, they're not exactly unprecedented in American history. We've had plenty of times in our history when tariffs were a fact of life (perhaps even the majority of this country's existence). It didn't mean it was the end of America. Some people exaggerate way too much and think the roof will fall in. Do you consider that to be a reasoned approach to the issues facing this country?
It's also a matter of principles over personalities. Truth be told, a lot of people oppose Trump for no other reason than they dislike his personality. They think he's offensive and rude. Somehow, he offends and upsets the sensibilities of "polite society," and this is what people attack the most. But I would also question whether that's a reasoned approach as well.
This is what I'm observing in all of this, in that people are taking more of a surface-level approach to the whole debate. If you think that I'm wrong about that, then by all means, please try to show me where.
