Slavery was a normal course of affairs back then. It was until the late 1800s.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Slavery was a normal course of affairs back then. It was until the late 1800s.
If the Bible is supposed to be the eternal unalterable word of God, then why would it care about what mere humans thought as "normal?"Slavery was a normal course of affairs back then. It was until the late 1800s.
If the Bible is supposed to be the eternal unalterable word of God, then why would it care about what mere humans thought as "normal?"
I mean I often see Christians say the Bible is against gay sex and that's that no matter what is considered normal by society. But if that is the case why would the Bible make an exception for slavery just because it was popular and mainstream at one point? Isn't the idea of God's law that it is above man's law, therefore it would never be subject to mankinds flaws?
Is it a work in progress or eternal?
I am asking. The 10 Commandments are part of Mosaic Law. Are Christians not responsible to follow the 10 Commandments?And you disagree?
Why did Paul just not say, hey God does not approve of slavery? Seems a lot easier and far more loving. And it takes a stand on morality. Was he just a coward?You do not understand the basic teaching of Christ. We are commanded to love others, even our enemies. We are not commanded to kill our masters to be free of them if we are slaves. We are commanded by Christ to pray for those who spitefully use us or do evil to us.
Therefore Paul did not teach slaves to cause turmoil but rather to serve their masters and pray for them in hopes of turning them to Christ.
We are commanded to suffer for doing right rather than do evil to others, including our enemies.
I am asking. The 10 Commandments are part of Mosaic Law. Are Christians not responsible to follow the 10 Commandments?
Why did Paul just not say, hey God does not approve of slavery? Seems a lot easier and far more loving. And it takes a stand on morality. Was he just a coward?
Also banning secular gay marriage, denying rights to strangers who's lives do not affect you, is being kind? Loving? Showing Christ's compassion? That's a good way to turn them away from Christ if you ask me.
Are they the slaves in this equation? Supposed to be treated as lesser and just do nothing?
So God does not care about slavery? Does not consider it a sin? Even freely allowing it when he could have been clear to His followers that it was not acceptable.Paul was led by the Holy Spirit in what he said and did. When he spoke from his own mind and not the Spirit he said so.
I will not judge either the Holy Spirit or the Apostle Paul.
Sin is simply not acceptable to God. You can twist your words around anyway you like, you cannot change this simple fact. Homosexuality, adultery and fornication are all sin and are not acceptable in God's sight, no matter the circumstances.
A person cannot serve sin and please Holy God at the same time. It simply is not possible. It is a good thing we can be saved by faith, then.
So God does not care about slavery? Does not consider it a sin? Even freely allowing it when he could have been clear to His followers that it was not acceptable.
But the private lives of gay people are sinful? Did He just find slavery amusing to watch? Is God a nosy busybody more concerned about the sex lives of humans than He is about people actively forcing others to be slaves? That's some messed up prioties!
You basically answered "just coz." That's not an answer that's deflection. I'm asking about the implications, trying to apply critical thinking to the justifications used by both sides. You are free to not question your God, but I like questioning things.If you continue to ignore my answers, why then do you question me?
Question somebody else, then.
We are commanded by Christ to pray for those who spitefully use us or do evil to us.
Therefore Paul did not teach slaves to cause turmoil but rather to serve their masters and pray for them in hopes of turning them to Christ.
If you continue to ignore my answers, why then do you question me?
Question somebody else, then.
Your answers are non-sequiturs and cherry-picking at its finest.
So the slaves should pray for their freedom because slavery is evil. This causes a problem if the masters already profess to be Christian. Is it ok to be Christian and own slaves?
I wonder.....I am asking. The 10 Commandments are part of Mosaic Law. Are Christians not responsible to follow the 10 Commandments?
Fine, so you've determined that my answers are unsatisfactory.
So ask someone else.
Good question. You've read Matthew 5, what do you think? Stop asking me questions if you don't like my answers. I'm not going to sugarcoat anything for you.
I think, at that point, outlawing slavery would have blown their little minds.I wonder.....
If the 10 Commandments address banned acts ranging from the minor
(cursing) to the major (killing), why not ban enslavement of others?
If they are indeed the word of God, this appears to be his tacit approval of slavery.
No more so than prohibiting the consumption of bacon cheeseburgersI think, at that point, outlawing slavery would have blown their little minds.
Considering that bacon cheeseburgers didn't exist and slavery surely did, I don't think that is a fair comparison.No more so than prohibiting the consumption of bacon cheeseburgers
while coveting me neighbor's wife to pi$$ off me parents.