Magic Man
Reaper of Conversation
I'd expect Affleck to be every bit as good as Chris Evans.
But unlike you, I intend this as an insult to Affleck.
Evans did a great job with Cap.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'd expect Affleck to be every bit as good as Chris Evans.
But unlike you, I intend this as an insult to Affleck.
I think people tend to underestimate Affleck's work in the industry. It could be because he IS seen as a pretty-boy type and that's an indicator that he has to continue to prove himself with his ability. But Hollywoodland, Gone Baby Gone, Argo, The Town, and his work on Good Will Hunting shows he has done more work in fluff, action, and dramatic film work than what is being considered.
He wasn't a great Batman. He was an amazing Bruce Wayne.
But none of that is about his acting. He is a good director, and has done some good work. He's not even a horrible actor like Keanu Reeves. But he hasn't shown any special acting talent, and his usual persona is not right at all for Batman.
Anyone know why Bale didn't sign up for this one?
It isn't clear what you mean.He received high praise for his acting in Hollywoodland, which was about George Reeves (Superman) of all people.
He received high praise for his acting in Hollywoodland, which was about George Reeves (Superman) of all people.
The Oscar didn't fully redeem him.I saw something on Twitter not too long ago that made me giggle. It said something like "Get jeers for Daredevil. Work your *** off for 10 years to get back in the public's good graces. Win an Oscar. Get cast as Batman and BANG! you're back to Gigli again."
LOL
Interesting. I haven't seen high praise for it. I've seen people say he did OK with it, though.
The Oscar didn't fully redeem him.
The movie was slightly above adequate, & hardly one of the greats, eg, Pee Wee's Big Adventure.
Gigli.
Had to IMDB that one.
It has an incredibly low 2.4 rating.
Although it did score 0.1 higher than Pia Zadora's "The Lonely Lady".
These Batman movies were indeed some of the most critically acclaimed superhero movies ever. The genre is not one that is typically well-received by more critical viewers, but these Batman movies, along with the first Iron Man movie, kind of established what a modern superhero movie is like. It either has to be serious and complex (Batman), or it has to sort of make fun of itself and be well acted (Marvel's approach, with some of their better ones).You may want to rethink that policy (at least for the Batman trilogy; I didn't realize that Nolan's Superman movie came out yet). None of the batman movies, including the first one of this trilogy, made much of a splash in philosophical, psychological, theological, and social science literature. One expects, especially with the tragic shootings and Ledger's death, greater impact but not necessarily due to more sophisticated plots, narratives, etc.
So it is not particularly surprising to find journals like Journal of Religion & Popular Culture or Perspectives in Psychiatric Care (among many others) to feature articles about one or more of the movies. I have to say, however, that I wouldn't have expected to find articles like "Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: the dark knight or the joker in viral infections?" in a peer-reviewed journal like Immunological Reviews. Nor would one expect the Journal of Internal Medicine to publish, in the letters to the editor section, a paper like "The dark knight of syncope: the urologist!"
And then there's the academic volumes, from Batman & Philosophy: The Dark Knight of the Soul to chapter 2 ("The Best Batman Story: The Dark Knight Returns") of Beautiful Things in Popular Culture.
It's not often one finds everyone from theologians to psychiatrists writing papers in journals about film characters or films.
Kevin Smith once said that if he made a Superman movie (and he did write a script for one once), he would have picked Affleck for Superman. -_-`Because most of what I have seen Affleck in are Kevin Smith movies, I can only laugh thinking of Bartleby playing Batman.
He said he felt they already completed it with the trilogy and he wants to move on. He did say, however, that he would maybe consider it if Nolan asked him to.Anyone know why Bale didn't sign up for this one?
It's like enjoying raw oysters, for some it's great, & for others our gag reflex prevents downing'm.Evans did a great job with Cap.
It's like enjoying raw oysters, for some it's great, & for others our gag reflex prevents downing'm.
One of my problems is I just didn't find him a compelling character. It could be the writing though.
For me, the first great super hero movie was Darkman. (Superman was just too Wonder Bread.)
The mythology, the plot, the score, the great over the top acting. So I want my super heroes &
villains to inspire me.