Enough for what?So... ignorance of gods isn't enough, but we don't have to consider any of the gods a person is ignorant of.
What do you want it to satisfy?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Enough for what?So... ignorance of gods isn't enough, but we don't have to consider any of the gods a person is ignorant of.
Precisely.Except that disbelieving in gods wouldn't be like disbelieving in Sasquatch; it would be like disbelieving in cryptozoological creatures generally.
So how does one go about rejecting all cryptozoological creatures?Precisely.
Unless you have an alternative?
One doesn't.So how does one go about rejecting all cryptozoological creatures?
@9-10ths_PenguinEnough for what?
What do you want it to satisfy?
You said "the disbeliever is ignorant and could not be." You then went on to brush off the fact that your disbelievers in gods are ignorant of most gods.Enough for what?
What do you want it to satisfy?
belief is a decisionThat would require belief, not a decision.
see my previous postWhat a load of ****.
Bob has been introduced as not knowing there is a choice.
Nice try though.
Bob will wake up ....too lateBob is a human being with a mind void of unnecessary knowledge and an identity title. . because Bob is that simple and likely would have no need to argue fruitless unknown concepts that other human beings have a necessity to self identify with in fruitless complexity over the Internet.
Bob is wise.
Even taking for granted that you are correct about that... the matter of belief is not related to that.Bob will wake up ....too late
you did read my previous post?Even taking for granted that you are correct about that... the matter of belief is not related to that.
The disbeliever is not ignorant and could not be, and the ignorant person is not disbelieving and could not be. To lump them as one concept is contradictory.
Please explain the relevance.You said "the disbeliever is ignorant and could not be." You then went on to brush off the fact that your disbelievers in gods are ignorant of most gods.
have you considered....Moses meeting God?One doesn't.
One rejects only the concepts of characters that they have encountered in their remembered lifetime.
It could never be.belief is a decision
And if it's you who "told you that"?we stand from the dust......the angelic will be there....
and they will ask....
what do you believe?
and your response will make all the difference
they might also ask.....
Who told you that!?...............and why did you believe it!?
that response could be dealt with....harshly
And?have you considered....Moses meeting God?
God as a concept?....only a concept?
I was asking you....And?
I've not considered Moses at all.I was asking you....
care to put your soul at risk?
or perhaps you expect to go only as far as your grave?
your lack of consideration cannot stand well to someone who has consideredI've not considered Moses at all.
Edit: I'm an atheist.
You're contradicting yourself, that's all.Please explain the relevance.
Only in that you've misquoted me.You're contradicting yourself, that's all.